• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于确定消费者可穿戴心率设备有效性的建议:INTERLIVE 网络的专家声明和清单。

Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network.

机构信息

Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;55(14):767-779. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103148. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2020-103148
PMID:33397674
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8273688/
Abstract

Assessing vital signs such as heart rate (HR) by wearable devices in a lifestyle-related environment provides widespread opportunities for public health related research and applications. Commonly, consumer wearable devices assessing HR are based on photoplethysmography (PPG), where HR is determined by absorption and reflection of emitted light by the blood. However, methodological differences and shortcomings in the validation process hamper the comparability of the validity of various wearable devices assessing HR. Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being: Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The consortium was founded in 2019 and strives towards developing best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables assessing HR by PPG. The recommendations were developed through the following multi-stage process: (1) a systematic literature review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, (2) an unstructured review of the wider literature pertaining to factors that may introduce bias during the validation of these devices and (3) evidence-informed expert opinions of the INTERLIVE Network. A total of 44 articles were deemed eligible and retrieved through our systematic literature review. Based on these studies, a wider literature review and our evidence-informed expert opinions, we propose a validation framework with standardised recommendations using six domains: considerations for the target population, criterion measure, index measure, testing conditions, data processing and the statistical analysis. As such, this paper presents recommendations to standardise the validity testing and reporting of PPG-based HR wearables used by consumers. Moreover, checklists are provided to guide the validation protocol development and reporting. This will ensure that manufacturers, consumers, healthcare providers and researchers use wearables safely and to its full potential.

摘要

在与生活方式相关的环境中,使用可穿戴设备评估心率(HR)等生命体征为公共卫生相关的研究和应用提供了广泛的机会。通常,评估 HR 的消费者可穿戴设备基于光体积描记法(PPG),其中 HR 通过血液对发射光的吸收和反射来确定。然而,方法学上的差异和验证过程中的缺陷阻碍了评估 HR 的各种可穿戴设备的有效性的可比性。迈向智能健康与福祉:身体活动评估网络(INTERLIVE)是六个大学和一个工业伙伴的联合欧洲倡议。该联盟成立于 2019 年,致力于为评估消费者可穿戴设备和智能手机的有效性制定最佳实践建议。本专家声明提出了一种用于通过 PPG 评估 HR 的消费者可穿戴设备的最佳实践验证协议。该建议是通过以下多阶段过程制定的:(1)基于系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的系统文献综述,(2)对可能在这些设备验证过程中引入偏差的更广泛文献的非结构化综述,以及(3)INTERLIVE 网络的循证专家意见。通过我们的系统文献综述,共确定了 44 篇符合条件的文章并进行了检索。基于这些研究,通过更广泛的文献综述和我们循证的专家意见,我们提出了一个具有标准化建议的验证框架,使用六个领域:目标人群的考虑因素、标准测量、指标测量、测试条件、数据处理和统计分析。因此,本文提出了建议,以标准化消费者使用的基于 PPG 的 HR 可穿戴设备的有效性测试和报告。此外,还提供了检查表,以指导验证协议的制定和报告。这将确保制造商、消费者、医疗保健提供者和研究人员安全地使用可穿戴设备并充分发挥其潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc32/8273688/fcc7f947b132/bjsports-2020-103148f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc32/8273688/fcc7f947b132/bjsports-2020-103148f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc32/8273688/fcc7f947b132/bjsports-2020-103148f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network.关于确定消费者可穿戴心率设备有效性的建议:INTERLIVE 网络的专家声明和清单。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;55(14):767-779. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103148. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network.推荐用于确定消费者可穿戴设备和智能手机计步有效性的标准:INTERLIVE 网络的专家声明和清单。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;55(14):780-793. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103147. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
3
Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network.用于估计能量消耗的消费可穿戴设备和智能手机有效性的确定建议:INTERLIVE 网络的专家声明和清单。
Sports Med. 2022 Aug;52(8):1817-1832. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01665-4. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
Validity of Estimating the Maximal Oxygen Consumption by Consumer Wearables: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Expert Statement of the INTERLIVE Network.消费者可穿戴设备估算最大耗氧量的有效性:INTERLIVE 网络的系统评价和荟萃分析及专家声明。
Sports Med. 2022 Jul;52(7):1577-1597. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01639-y. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
5
The Impact of Wearable Technologies in Health Research: Scoping Review.可穿戴技术在健康研究中的影响:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 25;10(1):e34384. doi: 10.2196/34384.
6
Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study.消费者可穿戴心率测量在 24 小时内的准确性:个体内验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 11;7(3):e10828. doi: 10.2196/10828.
7
Validity of Wrist-Worn photoplethysmography devices to measure heart rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腕部光体积描记法设备测量心率的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Sep;38(17):2021-2034. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1767348. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
8
Evaluating the Validity and Utility of Wearable Technology for Continuously Monitoring Patients in a Hospital Setting: Systematic Review.评估可穿戴技术在医院环境中连续监测患者的有效性和实用性:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 18;9(8):e17411. doi: 10.2196/17411.
9
Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables.在研究中使用健身追踪器和智能手表测量身体活动:消费者腕戴式可穿戴设备分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 22;20(3):e110. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9157.
10
Finite State Machine Framework for Instantaneous Heart Rate Validation Using Wearable Photoplethysmography During Intensive Exercise.利用可穿戴光电容积脉搏波在剧烈运动期间进行即时心率验证的有限状态机框架。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019 Jul;23(4):1595-1606. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2018.2871177. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Activity Type Effects Signal Quality in Electrocardiogram Devices.活动类型对心电图设备中信号质量的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;25(16):5186. doi: 10.3390/s25165186.
2
Beyond FITT: addressing density in understanding the dose-response relationships of physical activity with health-an example based on brain health.超越FITT原则:在理解身体活动与健康的剂量反应关系中考虑强度——以脑健康为例
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05858-3.
3
Biostrap Kairos Wristband Versus Electrocardiography for Resting Heart Rate Variability Assessment.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for wrist-worn consumer wearable assessment of heart rate in biobehavioral research.生物行为研究中腕戴式消费级可穿戴设备心率评估指南。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jun 26;3:90. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0297-4. eCollection 2020.
2
Apple Watch detecting coronary ischaemia during chest pain episodes or an apple a day may keep myocardial infarction away.苹果手表在胸痛发作期间检测冠状动脉缺血,或者每天一个苹果可能预防心肌梗死。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jun 14;41(23):2224. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa290.
3
Accuracy of Optical Heart Rate Sensing Technology in Wearable Fitness Trackers for Young and Older Adults: Validation and Comparison Study.
用于静息心率变异性评估的Biostrap Kairos腕带与心电图的比较
Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 17;25(10):3165. doi: 10.3390/s25103165.
4
Validation of an Open-Source Smartwatch for Continuous Monitoring of Physical Activity and Heart Rate in Adults.一款用于成年人身体活动和心率连续监测的开源智能手表的验证
Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 6;25(9):2926. doi: 10.3390/s25092926.
5
Stress in action wearables database: A database of noninvasive wearable monitors with systematic technical, reliability, validity, and usability information.行动压力可穿戴设备数据库:一个包含无创可穿戴监测器以及系统的技术、可靠性、有效性和可用性信息的数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 May 13;57(6):171. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02685-4.
6
Validity of Hera Leto consumer earbuds for heart rate monitoring during stationary cycling.赫拉·勒托消费者耳塞在固定自行车运动期间用于心率监测的有效性。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 7;15(1):15944. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00559-5.
7
Wrist-Worn and Arm-Worn Wearables for Monitoring Heart Rate During Sedentary and Light-to-Vigorous Physical Activities: Device Validation Study.用于在久坐及轻度至剧烈体育活动期间监测心率的腕戴式和臂戴式可穿戴设备:设备验证研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Mar 21;9:e67110. doi: 10.2196/67110.
8
Validity and Inter-Device Reliability of the OTBeat Burn Monitor to Estimate Heart Rate During Exercise.OTBeat烧伤监测仪在运动期间估计心率的有效性和设备间可靠性。
Sports (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;13(2):49. doi: 10.3390/sports13020049.
9
Validity of heart rate measurements in wrist-based monitors across skin tones during exercise.运动期间基于手腕的监测器所测心率在不同肤色人群中的有效性。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 10;20(2):e0318724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318724. eCollection 2025.
10
Using Free-Living Heart Rate Data as an Objective Method to Assess Physical Activity: A Scoping Review and Recommendations by the INTERLIVE-Network Targeting Consumer Wearables.利用自由生活心率数据作为评估身体活动的客观方法:INTERLIVE网络针对消费者可穿戴设备的范围审查与建议
Sports Med. 2025 Feb;55(2):275-300. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02159-1. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
可穿戴健身追踪器中光学心率感应技术在年轻和老年成年人中的准确性:验证和比较研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 28;8(4):e14707. doi: 10.2196/14707.
4
Comparing apples and oranges or different types of citrus fruits? Using wearable versus stationary devices to analyze psychophysiological data.将苹果和橙子或不同类型的柑橘类水果进行比较?使用可穿戴设备与固定式设备来分析心理生理数据。
Psychophysiology. 2020 May;57(5):e13551. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13551. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Accuracy of Vital Signs Measurements by a Smartwatch and a Portable Health Device: Validation Study.智能手表和平板健康设备测量生命体征的准确性:验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 12;8(2):e16811. doi: 10.2196/16811.
6
Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors.探究可穿戴式光学心率传感器不准确的原因。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 10;3:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0226-6. eCollection 2020.
7
Use of a Smart Watch for Early Detection of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Validation Study.使用智能手表早期检测阵发性心房颤动:验证研究
JMIR Cardio. 2020 Jan 22;4(1):e14857. doi: 10.2196/14857.
8
Photoplethysmography based atrial fibrillation detection: a review.基于光电容积脉搏波描记术的心房颤动检测:综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jan 10;3:3. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0207-9. eCollection 2020.
9
Increasing and Evolving Role of Smart Devices in Modern Medicine.智能设备在现代医学中日益增长且不断演变的作用。
Eur Cardiol. 2019 Dec 18;14(3):181-186. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.02. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
Comprehensive Review on Current and Future Regulatory Requirements on Wearable Sensors in Preclinical and Clinical Testing.可穿戴传感器在临床前和临床试验中的当前及未来监管要求综述
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Nov 8;7:313. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00313. eCollection 2019.