• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬性内窥镜的质量控制:ScopeControl®与外科医生评估之间的比较研究

Quality control of rigid endoscopes: a comparative study between ScopeControl® and surgeons' evaluation.

作者信息

Courault Pierre, Emery Stéphane, Boudour Sofia, Rochefort Françoise, Ruffion Alain, Dussart Claude, Corvaisier Stéphane

机构信息

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Stérilisation Centrale, 1060 rue Nicéphore Niepce, 69800, Saint-Priest, France.

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Service d'urologie, 165 chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310, Pierre-Bénite, France.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6770-6776. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08181-4. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-08181-4
PMID:33398575
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In central sterile services departments (CSSD), the functionality of rigid endoscopes, which are complex and fragile reusable devices, is usually controlled visually and is considered a complex and subjective task. ScopeControl® was developed to provide an automated quality control of rigid endoscopes by measuring the value of six parameters: viewing angle (VA), field of view (FV), color correctness (CC), light transmission (LT), fibers transmission (FT), and focus (FC). The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of ScopeControl® to pre-emptively identify endoscope defects before the surgeon considers them as defective.

METHODS

The same endoscope was evaluated by surgeons during surgery using a scoring scale as well as the CSSD staff using the ScopeControl® during reprocessing. The ScopeControl® categorized the endoscope into 3 groups: "passed," "in danger," and "failed." Correlations between the surgeon's evaluation and results of the ScopeControl® were calculated.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-six controls were carried out concerning 51 different endoscopes. According to the surgeon's evaluation, 78.9% and 80.7% of controls were considered as satisfactory for image and brightness quality, respectively. Results obtained using ScopeControl® found that 13.3% of controls were considered as "passed," 31.3% "in danger," and 55.4% "failed," with poor correlation with the surgeons' evaluation. LT and FT parameters represented 95.2% of the reasons for failures. The ability of the ScopeControl® to detect endoscope defects earlier than surgeons was validated by tracking the results of endoscopes used and controlled several times.

CONCLUSION

The ScopeControl® achieved an objective and consistent quality control of endoscopes and showed poor correlation with the surgeon's opinion. In practice, the ScopeControl® could avoid the use of defective endoscopes in the surgery unit and thus improve the quality of the surgical procedure.

摘要

背景

在中央消毒供应室(CSSD),硬质内镜是复杂且易碎的可重复使用设备,其功能通常通过目视检查来控制,这被认为是一项复杂且主观的任务。ScopeControl® 的开发目的是通过测量六个参数的值来对硬质内镜进行自动化质量控制,这六个参数分别为视角(VA)、视野(FV)、颜色正确性(CC)、光传输(LT)、纤维传输(FT)和焦点(FC)。本研究的目的是评估 ScopeControl® 在外科医生将内镜视为有缺陷之前预先识别内镜缺陷的能力。

方法

同一条内镜在手术期间由外科医生使用评分量表进行评估,同时在再处理期间由CSSD工作人员使用ScopeControl® 进行评估。ScopeControl® 将内镜分为三组:“通过”、“有风险”和“失败”。计算外科医生的评估结果与ScopeControl® 的结果之间的相关性。

结果

对51条不同的内镜进行了166次检查。根据外科医生的评估,分别有78.9%和80.7%的检查在图像和亮度质量方面被认为是令人满意的。使用ScopeControl® 获得的结果发现,13.3%的检查被认为“通过”,31.3%“有风险”,55.4%“失败”,与外科医生的评估相关性较差。LT和FT参数占失败原因的95.2%。通过跟踪多次使用和检查的内镜结果,验证了ScopeControl® 比外科医生更早检测到内镜缺陷的能力。

结论

ScopeControl® 实现了对内镜的客观且一致的质量控制,并且与外科医生的意见相关性较差。在实际操作中,ScopeControl® 可以避免在手术科室使用有缺陷的内镜,从而提高手术质量。

相似文献

1
Quality control of rigid endoscopes: a comparative study between ScopeControl® and surgeons' evaluation.硬性内窥镜的质量控制:ScopeControl®与外科医生评估之间的比较研究
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6770-6776. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08181-4. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
Evaluation of the ScopeControl endoscope test system in six hospitals in The Netherlands.荷兰六家医院对ScopeControl内窥镜测试系统的评估。
Phys Med. 2015 Mar;31(2):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
3
Automated objective routine examination of optical quality of rigid endoscopes in a clinical setting.在临床环境中自动客观地检查硬性内窥镜的光学质量。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059579. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
4
A robotic flexible endoscope with shared autonomy: a study of mockup cholecystectomy.一种具有共享自主性的机器人柔性内窥镜:模拟胆囊切除术研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2730-2741. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07241-8. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
A new variable-view rigid endoscope evaluated in advanced gynecologic laparoscopy: a pilot study.一种新的可变视角刚性内窥镜在高级妇科腹腔镜检查中的评估:一项初步研究。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3260-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1702-5. Epub 2011 May 2.
6
Inconsistencies in endoscope-reprocessing and infection-control guidelines: the importance of endoscope drying.内窥镜再处理与感染控制指南中的不一致之处:内窥镜干燥的重要性。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2147-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00712.x.
7
[FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPY IN THE HANDS OF THE SURGEON - THE ISRAELI SURGEON'S POINT OF VIEW].[外科医生手中的软性内镜——以色列外科医生的观点]
Harefuah. 2019 Apr;158(4):248-252.
8
Rigid endoscopes--ensuring quality before use and after repair.
AORN J. 2004 Jul;80(1):103-9. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)60848-x.
9
Light intensity distribution in images from rigid endoscopes used in minimal access sinus surgery.微创鼻窦手术中使用的硬性内窥镜图像中的光强分布。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov 23;6(6):1283-1288. doi: 10.1002/lio2.703. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Evaluation of a novel multi-articulated endoscope: proof of concept through a virtual simulation.新型多关节内窥镜的评估:通过虚拟模拟进行概念验证。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Jul;12(7):1123-1130. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1599-0. Epub 2017 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-Center Evaluation of Optical Degradation Patterns in Rigid Endoscopes: A Data-Driven Approach.
Med Devices (Auckl). 2025 Oct 9;18:507-518. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S550187. eCollection 2025.