Grande-Ratti María Florencia, Esteban Jorge Ariel, Mongelos Damazo, Díaz Mario Hernán, Giunta Diego Hernán, Martínez Bernardo Julio
Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Central de Emergencias de Adultos, Argentina.
Rev Med Chil. 2020 May;148(5):602-610. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872020000500602.
Undertriage or the underestimation of the urgency of the condition of a person arriving in an emergency department (ED) represents a measure of quality care.
To estimate the prevalence of undertriage in a high complexity hospital of Argentina; to describe characteristics and mortality of these patients.
All consultations admitted to the ED during 2014 were analyzed. Those assigned to a lower level of admission risk (classified as Emergency Severity Index -ESI- 3 to 5) but required hospitalization in intensive care units (ICU) as the first hospitalization place were considered as an undertriage. A random sample of correctly categorized admissions (ESI 1 or 2), who were subsequently hospitalized in the ICU, was selected as a comparison group.
The global undertriage prevalence was 0.30% (316/104,832). Among patients admitted to the ICU, the prevalence was 21% (316/1,461; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 19-24). The 316 patients whose severity was underestimated had a median age of 73 years, and admitted between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. in a greater proportion. Overall hospital mortality was 8.9% (95% CI 6.78-11.38), and all deaths occurred after the patient was transferred from the emergency room. There were no differences in mortality between patients with correct triage or undertriage (11 and 7% respectively, p = 0.09). No differences were observed either in the total number of critical interventions during care in the first 24 hours. Significant differences were observed in requirements for mechanical ventilation (11 and 4% respectively, p = 0.01), orotracheal intubation (10 and 5% respectively p = 0.01) and non-invasive ventilation (8 and 4% respectively, p = 0.05).
Undertriage rate in this series was low, but it can be improved.
分诊不足或对进入急诊科患者病情紧急程度的低估是衡量医疗质量的一个指标。
评估阿根廷一家高复杂性医院分诊不足的发生率;描述这些患者的特征和死亡率。
对2014年期间急诊科收治的所有会诊病例进行分析。那些被分配到较低入院风险级别(分类为急诊严重程度指数-ESI-3至5)但需要在重症监护病房(ICU)作为首次住院地点的患者被视为分诊不足。随机抽取随后在ICU住院的分类正确的入院患者(ESI 1或2)作为对照组。
总体分诊不足发生率为0.30%(316/104,832)。在入住ICU的患者中,发生率为21%(316/1,461;95%置信区间(CI)19 - 24)。316例病情被低估的患者中位年龄为73岁,且更多在上午7点至晚上9点之间入院。总体医院死亡率为8.9%(95% CI 6.78 - 11.38),所有死亡均发生在患者从急诊室转出后。正确分诊或分诊不足的患者之间死亡率无差异(分别为11%和7%,p = 0.09)。在最初24小时的护理期间,关键干预总数也无差异。在机械通气需求(分别为11%和4%,p = 0.01)、经口气管插管(分别为10%和5%,p = 0.01)和无创通气(分别为8%和4%,p = 0.05)方面观察到显著差异。
本系列中的分诊不足率较低,但仍可改善。