• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊科检测重症儿童的安全性。

Safety of the Manchester Triage System to Detect Critically Ill Children at the Emergency Department.

作者信息

Zachariasse Joany M, Kuiper Jan Willem, de Hoog Matthijs, Moll Henriëtte A, van Veen Mirjam

机构信息

Department of General Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;177:232-237.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.068. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.068
PMID:27480197
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of the Manchester Triage System in pediatric emergency care for children who require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).

STUDY DESIGN

Between 2006 and 2013, 50 062 consecutive emergency department visits of children younger than the age of 16 years were included. We determined the percentage of undertriage, defined as the proportion of children admitted to ICU triaged as low urgent according to the Manchester Triage System, and diagnostic performance measures, including sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic OR. Characteristics of undertriaged patients were compared with correctly triaged patients. In a logistic regression model, risk factors for undertriage were determined.

RESULTS

In total, 238 (28.7%) of the 830 children admitted to ICU during the study period were undertriaged. Sensitivity of high Manchester Triage System urgency levels to detect ICU admission was 71% (95% CI 68%-74%) and specificity 85% (95% CI 85%-85%). Severity of illness was lower in undertriaged children than correctly triaged children admitted to ICU. Risk factors for undertriage were age <3 months, medical presenting problem, comorbidity, referral by a medical specialist or emergency medical services, and presentation during the evening or night shift.

CONCLUSION

The Manchester Triage System misclassifies a substantial number of children who require ICU admission. Modifications targeted at young children and children with a comorbid condition could possibly improve safety of the Manchester Triage System in pediatric emergency care.

摘要

目的

评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在需要入住重症监护病房(ICU)的儿科急诊护理中的安全性。

研究设计

纳入2006年至2013年间16岁以下儿童连续50062次急诊就诊情况。我们确定了分诊不足的百分比,分诊不足定义为根据曼彻斯特分诊系统被分诊为低紧急程度但入住ICU的儿童比例,以及诊断性能指标,包括敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比。将分诊不足患者的特征与正确分诊患者进行比较。在逻辑回归模型中确定分诊不足的危险因素。

结果

在研究期间入住ICU的830名儿童中,共有238名(28.7%)被分诊不足。曼彻斯特分诊系统高紧急程度水平检测ICU入住的敏感性为71%(95%CI 68%-74%),特异性为85%(95%CI 85%-85%)。分诊不足的儿童比入住ICU的正确分诊儿童病情严重程度更低。分诊不足的危险因素包括年龄小于3个月、就诊的医疗问题、合并症、由医学专家或紧急医疗服务机构转诊以及在晚班或夜班就诊。

结论

曼彻斯特分诊系统将大量需要入住ICU的儿童分类错误。针对幼儿和患有合并症的儿童进行改进可能会提高曼彻斯特分诊系统在儿科急诊护理中的安全性。

相似文献

1
Safety of the Manchester Triage System to Detect Critically Ill Children at the Emergency Department.曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊科检测重症儿童的安全性。
J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;177:232-237.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.068. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
2
Recognizing critically ill children with a modified pediatric early warning score at the emergency department, a feasibility study.在急诊科使用改良儿科早期预警评分识别危重症患儿的可行性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;178(2):229-234. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3285-9. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
3
Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care: prospective observational study.儿科急诊护理中的曼彻斯特分诊系统:前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ. 2008 Sep 22;337:a1501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1501.
4
Identifying 'at-risk' critically ill patients who present to the emergency department and require intensive care unit admission: A retrospective observational cohort study.识别到急诊就诊并需要入住重症监护病房的“高危”危重症患者:一项回顾性观察性队列研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2021 May;34(3):195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
5
Comparison of an informally structured triage system, the emergency severity index, and the manchester triage system to distinguish patient priority in the emergency department.比较一种非结构化的分诊系统、紧急严重指数和曼彻斯特分诊系统,以区分急诊科患者的优先顺序。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):822-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01122.x.
6
Predictors of critical care admission in emergency department patients triaged as low to moderate urgency.分诊为低至中度紧急程度的急诊科患者重症监护入院的预测因素。
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Apr;65(4):818-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04938.x. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
7
Undertriage in the Manchester triage system: an assessment of severity and options for improvement.曼彻斯特分诊系统中的分诊不足:严重程度评估和改进选择。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Jul;96(7):653-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.206797. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
8
Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study.荷兰综合急诊科患者群体中曼彻斯特分诊系统的可靠性和有效性:一项模拟研究的结果
Emerg Med J. 2008 Jul;25(7):431-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.055228.
9
Predicting admission and mortality with the Emergency Severity Index and the Manchester Triage System: a retrospective observational study.使用急诊严重程度指数和曼彻斯特分诊系统预测入院情况和死亡率:一项回顾性观察研究。
Emerg Med J. 2009 Jul;26(7):506-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.063768.
10
Undertriage of patients requiring direct admission to intensive care from the emergency department for medical conditions: impact on prognosis and associated factors.急诊科需要直接收入重症监护病房的患者分诊不足:对预后的影响和相关因素。
Emergencias. 2021 Oct;33(5):361-367.

引用本文的文献

1
Aspects of triage for infants: a narrative review.婴儿分诊的各个方面:一篇叙述性综述。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Apr 12;184(5):294. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06127-3.
2
Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index in US Emergency Departments for the Rate of Mistriage.评估美国急诊部的紧急严重程度指数在分诊错误率方面的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233404. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3404.
3
Improving the safety of the Manchester triage system for children with congenital heart disease.提高先天性心脏病儿童曼彻斯特分诊系统的安全性。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Nov;181(11):3831-3838. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04594-6. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
4
Practice variation across five European paediatric emergency departments: a prospective observational study.五个欧洲儿科急诊部的实践差异:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 31;12(3):e053382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053382.
5
Improving the prioritization of children at the emergency department: Updating the Manchester Triage System using vital signs.提高急诊科儿童的优先等级:使用生命体征更新曼彻斯特分诊系统。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 9;16(2):e0246324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246324. eCollection 2021.
6
The performance of the EMS triage (RETTS-p) and the agreement between the field assessment and final hospital diagnosis: a prospective observational study among children < 16 years.急诊医疗服务分诊(RETTS-p)的表现以及现场评估与医院最终诊断之间的一致性:一项针对16岁以下儿童的前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Dec 16;19(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1857-0.
7
Diversity in the emergency care for febrile children in Europe: a questionnaire study.欧洲发热儿童急诊护理的多样性:一项问卷调查研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Jun 27;3(1):e000456. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000456. eCollection 2019.
8
Association between hypotension and serious illness in the emergency department: an observational study.在急诊科,低血压与严重疾病之间的关联:一项观察性研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Jun;105(6):545-551. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316231. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
9
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes for Children During Emergency Department Triage.基于机器学习的急诊科分诊中儿童临床结局预测。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186937. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6937.
10
VALIDATION OF SCREENING SYSTEMS IN PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY.儿科急诊筛查系统的验证
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2018 Oct-Dec;36(4):386-387. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;4;00018.