Division of Neurology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Epilepsia. 2021 Feb;62(2):472-480. doi: 10.1111/epi.16793. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a diagnosis of exclusion; the definition includes individuals with epilepsy who die suddenly without an identifiable toxicological or anatomical cause of death. Limited data suggest underidentification of SUDEP as the cause of death on death certificates. Here, we evaluate the autopsy-reported cause of death in a population-based cohort of SUDEP cases.
Case summaries of forensic autopsies conducted in Ontario, Canada between January 2014 and June 2016 were retrospectively screened using a language processing script for decedents with a history of epilepsy or seizures. After manual review for potential SUDEP cases, two neurologists independently examined the autopsy reports and classified deaths by Nashef criteria. Demographic characteristics and consideration by the forensic pathologist of the role of epilepsy, seizure, and SUDEP in death were summarized.
One hundred and eight Definite, 34 Definite Plus, and 22 Possible SUDEP cases were identified. Seventy-five percent of Definite/Definite Plus SUDEP cases identified by the neurologists were attributed to SUDEP, epilepsy, or seizure disorder in the autopsy report. There was a significant association between the proportion of cases listed in the autopsy report as SUDEP, epilepsy, or seizure disorder and neurologists' SUDEP classification (86% of Definite, 38% of Definite Plus, 0% of Possible). Age was significantly associated with SUDEP classification; Definite cases were younger than Definite Plus, which were younger than Possible SUDEP cases.
Most SUDEP cases identified by neurologists were classified concordantly by forensic pathologists in Ontario, Canada; however, concordance decreased with increased case complexity. Although the role of epilepsy/seizures was considered in most Definite/Definite Plus cases, this study highlights the need for autopsy report review of potential SUDEP cases in research studies and assessments of the public health burden of SUDEP. The relationship between age and SUDEP classification has important public health implications; SUDEP incidence may be underappreciated in older adults.
癫痫猝死(SUDEP)是一种排除性诊断;其定义包括因无法识别的毒理学或解剖学原因而突然死亡的癫痫患者。有限的数据表明,死亡证明对 SUDEP 的识别不足。在此,我们评估了一个基于人群的 SUDEP 病例队列的尸检报告死因。
使用语言处理脚本对 2014 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月期间在加拿大安大略省进行的法医尸检案例摘要进行了回顾性筛选,这些尸检案例摘要中包含有癫痫或癫痫发作病史的死者。在对潜在的 SUDEP 病例进行手动审查后,两名神经科医生独立检查了尸检报告,并根据 Nashef 标准对死亡进行了分类。总结了人口统计学特征以及法医病理学家对癫痫、癫痫发作和 SUDEP 在死亡中的作用的考虑。
确定了 108 例明确、34 例明确加和 22 例可能的 SUDEP 病例。神经科医生确定的明确/明确加和 SUDEP 病例中,有 75%在尸检报告中归因于 SUDEP、癫痫或癫痫发作障碍。尸检报告中列出的 SUDEP、癫痫或癫痫发作障碍的病例比例与神经科医生的 SUDEP 分类之间存在显著关联(明确 86%、明确加和 38%、可能 SUDEP 0%)。年龄与 SUDEP 分类显著相关;明确病例比明确加和病例年轻,而明确加和病例比可能的 SUDEP 病例年轻。
在加拿大安大略省,大多数被神经科医生确定的 SUDEP 病例得到了法医病理学家的一致分类;然而,随着病例复杂性的增加,一致性降低。尽管在大多数明确/明确加和病例中都考虑了癫痫/发作的作用,但本研究强调了在研究和评估 SUDEP 的公共卫生负担时需要对潜在的 SUDEP 病例进行尸检报告审查。年龄与 SUDEP 分类之间的关系具有重要的公共卫生意义;老年人的 SUDEP 发病率可能被低估。