Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK.
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Tulsa, OK.
Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):E95-E100.
The use of opioids for the treatment of pain is a risk versus benefit analysis and metabolic disease is an often overlooked variable in the equation and may lead to increased risk of comorbidities of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease and diabetes.
Our objective was to identify and describe abnormalities among the comprehensive metabolic and lipid panels of individuals taking prescription opioids.
We performed a cross-sectional study of the laboratory values with 3 cycles (2011-2016) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in March 2020.
NHANES sampling is conducted using a multistaged, stratified, cluster sampling technique to create a representative sample of the United States.
We excluded patients with histories of cancer and under the age of 25 years. Our final sample size was 11,061 (n = 162,547,635), with 797 reportedly using a prescription opioid in the past 30 days-a weighted percent representing 22.95% of the US population. Our analyses identified mean differences in biomarkers between individuals taking prescription opioids and the US population.
Laboratory values from the comprehensive metabolic panel were all within reference ranges for both groups, with only bilirubin levels being statistically lower in the group currently taking prescription opioids. Values from the lipid panel of both the opioid using and comparison groups were above reference range for total cholesterol and fasting glucose. The opioid using group was also higher than the reference range for triglycerides (mean [M] = 165.4, standard deviation [SD] = 14.2) and insulin (M = 15.5, SD = 2.2), whereas the comparison group was not. The oral glucose measure was within normal ranges for both groups; however, the opioid using group was 13.7 points higher than the comparison group (M = 122.3, SD = 1.8; M = 108.6, SD = 4.0; P < 0.01).
While our study uses a large sample for a robust generalizable analysis it is a correlation study and a longitudinal cohort would provide better evidence linking potential disease states to prescription opioid use.
Although all Americans should be alarmed at the lipid levels reported in this study, specific combinations of heightened lipid laboratory values among prescription opioid users accelerate the trajectories toward comorbidities-heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes-leading to diminished quality of life. Therefore pain management and comprehensive drug recovery programs should include nutritional counseling and physical activity as part of their overall treatment plan.
使用阿片类药物治疗疼痛是一种风险与收益的分析,而代谢疾病是方程式中经常被忽视的一个变量,它可能导致心血管和脑血管疾病以及糖尿病等合并症的风险增加。
我们的目的是确定并描述服用处方类阿片药物人群的综合代谢和血脂检测结果中的异常情况。
我们对 2020 年 3 月进行的三次(2011-2016 年)国家健康和营养调查(NHANES)的实验室值进行了横断面研究。
NHANES 采用多阶段、分层、聚类抽样技术进行抽样,以创建美国的代表性样本。
我们排除了有癌症病史和年龄在 25 岁以下的患者。我们的最终样本量为 11061 人(n=162547635 人),其中 797 人报告在过去 30 天内使用过处方类阿片药物,这一比例代表了美国人口的 22.95%。我们的分析确定了服用处方类阿片药物的个体与美国人群之间生物标志物的平均差异。
两组的综合代谢指标的实验室值均在参考范围内,只有胆红素水平在目前服用处方类阿片药物的组中统计学上较低。使用类阿片药物组和对照组的血脂指标均高于总胆固醇和空腹血糖的参考范围。使用类阿片药物组的甘油三酯(均值[M]=165.4,标准差[SD]=14.2)和胰岛素(M=15.5,SD=2.2)水平也高于参考范围,而对照组则没有。口服葡萄糖检测值在两组均处于正常范围内;然而,使用类阿片药物组比对照组高 13.7 分(M=122.3,SD=1.8;M=108.6,SD=4.0;P<0.01)。
虽然我们的研究使用了大量的样本进行稳健的可推广分析,但它是一项相关性研究,纵向队列研究将提供更好的证据,将潜在疾病状态与处方类阿片药物的使用联系起来。
尽管所有美国人都应该对这项研究中报告的血脂水平感到震惊,但处方类阿片药物使用者的特定血脂实验室值升高组合会加速合并症(心脏病、脑血管病和糖尿病)的发生,从而降低生活质量。因此,疼痛管理和综合药物康复计划应将营养咨询和体育活动纳入其整体治疗计划。