• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互动听力中沟通失误的认知处理:听众犹豫不决和认知努力的评估

Cognitive Processing of Miscommunication in Interactive Listening: An Evaluation of Listener Indecision and Cognitive Effort.

作者信息

Roche Jennifer M, Zgonnikov Arkady, Morett Laura M

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Kent State University, OH.

Department of Cognitive Robotics, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jan 14;64(1):159-175. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00128. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00128
PMID:33400552
Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the social and cognitive underpinnings of miscommunication during an interactive listening task. Method An eye and computer mouse-tracking visual-world paradigm was used to investigate how a listener's cognitive effort (local and global) and decision-making processes were affected by a speaker's use of ambiguity that led to a miscommunication. Results Experiments 1 and 2 found that an environmental cue that made a miscommunication more or less salient impacted listener language processing effort (eye-tracking). Experiment 2 also indicated that listeners may develop different processing heuristics dependent upon the speaker's use of ambiguity that led to a miscommunication, exerting a significant impact on cognition and decision making. We also found that perspective-taking effort and decision-making complexity metrics (computer mouse tracking) predict language processing effort, indicating that instances of miscommunication produced cognitive consequences of indecision, thinking, and cognitive pull. Conclusion Together, these results indicate that listeners behave both reciprocally and adaptively when miscommunications occur, but the way they respond is largely dependent upon the type of ambiguity and how often it is produced by the speaker.

摘要

目的 本研究的目的是评估交互式听力任务中沟通失误的社会和认知基础。方法 使用眼动和电脑鼠标追踪的视觉世界范式来研究说话者使用导致沟通失误的歧义时,听者的认知努力(局部和全局)及决策过程是如何受到影响的。结果 实验1和实验2发现,使沟通失误或多或少显著的环境线索会影响听者的语言处理努力(眼动追踪)。实验2还表明,听者可能会根据说话者使用导致沟通失误的歧义而形成不同的处理启发式方法,这对认知和决策产生重大影响。我们还发现,换位思考努力和决策复杂性指标(电脑鼠标追踪)可预测语言处理努力,这表明沟通失误的情况会产生犹豫不决、思考和认知牵引等认知后果。结论 这些结果共同表明,当出现沟通失误时,听者的行为既有相互性又有适应性,但他们的反应方式很大程度上取决于歧义的类型以及说话者产生歧义的频率。

相似文献

1
Cognitive Processing of Miscommunication in Interactive Listening: An Evaluation of Listener Indecision and Cognitive Effort.互动听力中沟通失误的认知处理:听众犹豫不决和认知努力的评估
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jan 14;64(1):159-175. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00128. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Evaluating Speaker-Listener Cognitive Effort in Speech Communication Through Brain-to-Brain Synchrony: A Pilot Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Investigation.通过脑-脑同步评估言语交流中的说话者-倾听者认知努力:一项初步的功能性近红外光谱研究。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 May 7;67(5):1339-1359. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00476. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
Expectations about the source of a speaker's accent affect accent adaptation.说话者口音来源的期望会影响口音适应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 May;145(5):3218. doi: 10.1121/1.5108831.
4
Cognitive Load and Listening Effort: Concepts and Age-Related Considerations.认知负荷与听力努力:概念及与年龄相关的考量
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:77S-84S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000304.
5
Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.母语和非母语听者在英语语音感知中因噪声、混响和说话者外国口音而产生的听力努力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Apr 15;62(4):1068-1081. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0423.
6
The effect of an aphasia ID card on the processing of language produced by a speaker with nonfluent aphasia.失语症身份证对非流畅性失语症患者语言产生过程的影响。
J Commun Disord. 2022 Nov-Dec;100:106268. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106268. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
7
Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.说话人面部的动态信息是否有助于语义语音处理?ERP 证据。
Cortex. 2018 Jul;104:12-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.031. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
8
The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.在测量听力努力的双任务范式中改变次要任务的效果。
Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):611-22. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055.
9
How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.助听设备、背景噪声和视觉线索如何影响客观听力努力程度。
Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):e52-64. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827f0431.
10
Effects of Disfluency in Online Interpretation of Deception.网络欺骗解读中不流畅性的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41 Suppl 6:1434-1456. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12378. Epub 2016 Jun 1.