Suppr超能文献

接受标准剂量普拉格雷与剂量递减策略治疗的东亚急性冠脉综合征患者的药效学特征和出血事件发生率:一项随机 A-MATCH 试验。

Pharmacodynamic Profile and Prevalence of Bleeding Episode in East Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated with Prasugrel Standard-Dose versus De-escalation Strategy: A Randomized A-MATCH Trial.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, South Korea.

Institute of the Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2021 Oct;121(10):1376-1386. doi: 10.1055/a-1346-3300. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

Abstract

Compared with Caucasian patients, East Asian patients have the unique risk-benefit trade-off and different responsiveness to antithrombotic regimens. The aim of this study was to compare pharmacodynamic profile in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) treated with prasugrel standard-dose versus a de-escalation strategy. Before discharge, ACS patients with age <75 years or weight ≥60 kg ( = 255) were randomly assigned to the standard-dose (10-mg group) or de-escalation strategy (5-mg group or platelet function test [PFT]-guided group). After 1 month, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay-based platelet reactivity (P2Y12 reaction unit [PRU]) and bleeding episodes were evaluated. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with the therapeutic window (85 ≤ PRU ≤ 208). The 250 patients completed 1-month treatment. The percentage of patients within the therapeutic window was significantly lower in the 10-mg group ( = 85) compared with the 5-mg ( = 83) and PFT-guided groups ( = 82) (35.3 vs. 67.5 vs. 65.9%) (odds ratio [OR]: 3.80 and 3.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.01-7.21 and 1.87-6.69, respectively). Compared with the 10-mg group, the bleeding rate was tended to be lower with de-escalation strategies (35.3 vs. 24.1% vs. 23.2%) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58 and 0.55; 95% CI: 0.30-1.14 and 0.28-1.09, respectively). "PRU < 127" was the optimal cut-off for predicting 1-month bleeding events (area under the curve: 0.616; 95% CI: 0.543-0.689;  = 0.005), which criteria was significantly associated with early discontinuation of prasugrel treatment (HR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.28-3.03;  = 0.001). In conclusion, compared with the standard-dose prasugrel, the prasugrel de-escalation strategy in East Asian patients presented with ACS showed a higher chance within the therapeutic window and a lower tendency toward bleeding episodes. REGISTRATION:  URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier:NCT01951001.

摘要

与高加索患者相比,东亚患者具有独特的风险效益权衡,并且对抗栓方案的反应不同。本研究旨在比较东亚急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者接受普拉格雷标准剂量与降低剂量策略治疗的药效学特征。在出院前,年龄<75 岁或体重≥60kg 的 ACS 患者(n=255)被随机分配至标准剂量(10mg 组)或降低剂量策略组(5mg 组或血小板功能试验[PFT]指导组)。在 1 个月后,评估VerifyNow P2Y12 检测的血小板反应性(P2Y12 反应单位[PRU])和出血事件。主要终点是治疗窗内(85≤PRU≤208)患者的比例。250 例患者完成了 1 个月的治疗。与 10mg 组(n=85)相比,5mg 组(n=83)和 PFT 指导组(n=82)中治疗窗内的患者比例明显更高(分别为 67.5%、82.0%和 82.0%)(比值比[OR]:3.80 和 3.54;95%置信区间[CI]:2.01-7.21 和 1.87-6.69)。与 10mg 组相比,降低剂量策略的出血发生率有降低的趋势(分别为 35.3%、24.1%和 23.2%)(风险比[HR]:0.58 和 0.55;95%CI:0.30-1.14 和 0.28-1.09)。“PRU<127”是预测 1 个月出血事件的最佳截断值(曲线下面积:0.616;95%CI:0.543-0.689; = 0.005),该标准与普拉格雷治疗的早期停药显著相关(HR:2.00;95%CI:1.28-3.03; = 0.001)。总之,与标准剂量普拉格雷相比,东亚 ACS 患者的普拉格雷降低剂量策略具有更高的治疗窗内机会和更低的出血倾向。注册:URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01951001。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验