Kwon Osung, Park Duk-Woo
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Cardiovascular Research Institute for Intractable Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
JACC Asia. 2022 Feb 15;2(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.005. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Because guidelines and recommendations in response to multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of new therapies undergo rapid changes, antithrombotic therapies for patients after acute coronary syndrome, or percutaneous coronary intervention, are becoming more complex in daily clinical practice. The proportion of Asian populations enrolled in landmark RCTs is substantially low, which limits the direct application of trial findings into clinical practice in Asian countries. Moreover, compared with Caucasian patients, East Asian patients are considered to have a different ischemia/bleeding propensity in response to antithrombotic therapy, known as the "East Asian paradox" (ie, more bleeding events but fewer thromboembolic events). Coincident with consecutive RCTs in Western populations to optimize antithrombotic strategies, several such studies have now been conducted in East Asian cohorts. Herein, we provide a comprehensive summary of the key RCTs in this regard and propose future directions and perspectives for optimal antithrombotic therapies in East Asian patients.
由于针对新疗法的多项随机临床试验(RCT)所制定的指南和建议变化迅速,在日常临床实践中,急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的抗血栓治疗正变得愈发复杂。参与标志性RCT的亚洲人群比例极低,这限制了试验结果在亚洲国家临床实践中的直接应用。此外,与白种人患者相比,东亚患者在接受抗血栓治疗时被认为具有不同的缺血/出血倾向,即所谓的“东亚悖论”(即出血事件更多但血栓栓塞事件更少)。在西方人群中相继开展优化抗血栓策略的RCT的同时,目前也在东亚人群中进行了多项此类研究。在此,我们全面总结了这方面的关键RCT,并提出东亚患者最佳抗血栓治疗的未来方向和前景。