McEvoy Natalie, Avsar Pinar, Patton Declan, Curley Gerard, Kearney Cathal J, Moore Zena
School of Nursing & Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland.
School of Nursing & Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland; Skin Wounds and Trauma (SWaT) Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland.
J Tissue Viability. 2021 May;30(2):168-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
The incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs) remain high, despite the wealth of knowledge on appropriate prevention strategies currently available.
The primary objective of this systematic review was to examine the economic impact of pressure ulcers (PU) among adult intensive care patients. A systematic review was undertaken, and the following databases were searched; Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was used to formulate the review. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC)-list. Data were extracted using a pre-designed extraction tool, and a narrative analysis was undertaken.
Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Five reported costs associated with the prevention of pressure ulcers and three explored costs of treatment strategies. Four main PU prevention cost items were identified: support surfaces, dressing materials, staff costs, and costs associated with mobilisation. Seven main PU treatment cost items were reported: dressing materials, support surfaces, drugs, surgery, lab tests, imaging, additional stays and nursing care. The overall validities of the studies varied between 37 and 79%, meaning that there is potential for bias within all the included studies.
There was a significant difference in the cost of PU prevention and treatment strategies between studies. This is problematic as it becomes difficult to accurately evaluate costs from the existing literature, thereby inhibiting the usefulness of the data to inform practice. Given the methodological heterogeneity among studies, future studies in this area are needed and these should use specific methodological guidelines to generate high-quality health economic studies.
尽管目前已有大量关于适当预防策略的知识,但重症监护病房(ICU)中危重症患者压疮的发病率和患病率仍然很高。
本系统评价的主要目的是研究成年重症监护患者压疮的经济影响。进行了系统评价,并检索了以下数据库:医学期刊数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)和考克兰图书馆。采用系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南来制定本评价。使用健康经济标准共识(CHEC)清单进行质量评估。使用预先设计的提取工具提取数据,并进行叙述性分析。
七项研究符合纳入标准。五项研究报告了与预防压疮相关的成本,三项研究探讨了治疗策略的成本。确定了四项主要的压疮预防成本项目:支撑面、敷料材料、人员成本以及与活动相关的成本。报告了七项主要的压疮治疗成本项目:敷料材料、支撑面、药物、手术、实验室检查、影像学检查、额外住院时间和护理。这些研究的整体效度在37%至79%之间,这意味着所有纳入研究都存在偏倚的可能性。
不同研究之间压疮预防和治疗策略的成本存在显著差异。这存在问题,因为难以从现有文献中准确评估成本,从而限制了这些数据对实践的指导作用。鉴于各研究之间在方法学上存在异质性,该领域未来需要开展研究,且应使用特定的方法学指南来开展高质量的卫生经济学研究。