Rai S K, Sud A D, Kashid M, Gogoi B
Department of Orthopaedics, Indian Naval Hospital Ship Asvini, Mumbai, India.
Department of Orthopaedics, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.
Malays Orthop J. 2020 Nov;14(3):66-72. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2011.011.
Osteosynthesis by plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures as a gold standard for fracture fixation has been proven beyond doubt. However, during conventional anterolateral plating Radial nerve injury may occur which can be avoided by applying plate on the medial flat surface. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of application of plate on the flat medial surface of humerus rather than the conventional anterolateral surface.
This study was conducted between Oct 2010 to Dec 2015. One-hundred-fifty fracture shafts of the humerus were treated with the anteromedial plating through the anterolateral approach.
One-hundred-fifty patients with a fracture shaft of the humerus were treated with anteromedial plating. Twenty were female (mean ±SD,28 years±4.5) and 130 were male (mean ± SD, 38 years±5.6). One hundred and forty-eight out of 150 (98.6%) patients achieved union at 12 months. Two of three patients developed a superficial infection, both of which were treated successfully by antibiotics and one developed a deep infection, which was treated by wound debridement, prolonged antibiotics with the removal of the plate and subsequently by delayed plating and bone grafting.
In the present study, we applied plate on the anteromedial flat surface of humerus using the anterolateral approach. It is an easier and quicker fixation as compared to anterolateral plating because later involved much more dissection than a medial application of the plate and this application of plate on a medial flat surface, does not required Radial nerve exposure and palsy post-operatively. The significant improvement in elbow flexion without brachialis dissection is also a potential benefit of this approach. Based on our results, we recommend the application of an anteromedial plate for treatment of midshaft fractures humerus.
肱骨骨干骨折采用钢板固定进行骨接合术作为骨折固定的金标准已毋庸置疑。然而,在传统的前外侧钢板固定过程中可能会发生桡神经损伤,而通过在内侧平面应用钢板可避免这种情况。本研究的目的是评估在肱骨内侧平面而非传统的前外侧平面应用钢板的效果。
本研究于2010年10月至2015年12月进行。通过前外侧入路对150例肱骨干骨折采用前内侧钢板固定治疗。
150例肱骨干骨折患者接受了前内侧钢板固定治疗。其中女性20例(平均±标准差,28岁±4.5岁),男性130例(平均±标准差,38岁±5.6岁)。150例患者中有148例(98.6%)在12个月时实现骨折愈合。3例患者中有2例发生表浅感染,均通过抗生素成功治疗,1例发生深部感染,通过伤口清创、延长抗生素使用时间并取出钢板,随后进行延期钢板固定和骨移植治疗。
在本研究中,我们通过前外侧入路在肱骨前内侧平面应用钢板。与前外侧钢板固定相比,这是一种更简便、快速的固定方法,因为前者涉及的解剖操作比内侧应用钢板多得多,而且在这个内侧平面应用钢板不需要暴露桡神经,术后也不会出现神经麻痹。在不进行肱肌解剖的情况下,肘关节屈曲功能显著改善也是这种方法的一个潜在优势。基于我们的研究结果,我们推荐应用前内侧钢板治疗肱骨干中段骨折。