Gangwar Vinay, Goel Navneet, Dua Apoorv, Dhankhar Vaneet, Mathur Mrigank, Rajpal Karan, Kumar Pramod, Verma Gyanendra
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 30;16(3):e57235. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57235. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Background Plate osteosynthesis is the gold standard treatment for the management of humeral shaft fractures. In the present study, we performed plate osteosynthesis on the anteromedial and anterolateral surfaces using the anterolateral approach to compare the functional outcomes. Aims and objectives To study and compare the functional outcome, time to achieve union and associated complications of anteromedial and anterolateral plating in humerus shaft fracture by anterolateral approach. Methods This prospective, randomised control study was performed at Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, New Delhi, India. This study had 46 patients in total, who were divided into two equal groups at random. All of the fractures in group A were treated using a limited contact dynamic compression plate (LCDCP) on the anterolateral surface using an anterolateral approach, while all of the fractures in group B were corrected using an anteromedial surface using an anterolateral approach using LCDCP. All the patients were followed for six months at regular intervals. At each follow-up, patients were assessed radiologically with X-rays and clinically by Rodriguez-Merchan criteria (RM criteria). Results and conclusions The union was achieved in the majority of the cases of the anteromedial plating group within 12 weeks (78.3%) with a mean union time of 11.7±1.5 weeks than the anterolateral group (56.5%) with a mean union time of 12.3±1.8 weeks. Based on functional assessment according to RM criteria, the excellent outcome was achieved in 69.6% and 65.2% of the anterolateral and anteromedial plating groups, respectively. There was no case of non-union and radial nerve palsy in anteromedial plating cases whereas in anterolateral cases one patient did not achieve union and two (8.7%) had radial nerve injury, which recovered completely by the end of the study. An anterolateral approach with anteromedial surface plating on the flat medial aspect of the humerus is a good technique for fixing humeral fractures.
背景 钢板内固定是肱骨干骨折治疗的金标准。在本研究中,我们采用前外侧入路在肱骨的前内侧和前外侧表面进行钢板内固定,以比较功能结果。
目的 研究并比较采用前外侧入路对肱骨干骨折进行前内侧和前外侧钢板固定的功能结果、达到骨愈合的时间及相关并发症。
方法 这项前瞻性随机对照研究在印度新德里的巴巴·萨希布·安贝德卡尔医学院及医院进行。本研究共有46例患者,随机分为两组。A组所有骨折均采用前外侧入路在前外侧表面使用有限接触动力加压钢板(LCDCP)治疗,而B组所有骨折均采用前外侧入路在前内侧表面使用LCDCP进行矫正。所有患者均定期随访6个月。每次随访时,通过X线进行影像学评估,并根据罗德里格斯 - 梅尔坎标准(RM标准)进行临床评估。
结果与结论 前内侧钢板固定组大多数病例在12周内实现骨愈合(78.3%),平均愈合时间为11.7±1.5周,而前外侧组为56.5%,平均愈合时间为12.3±1.8周。根据RM标准进行功能评估,前外侧和前内侧钢板固定组分别有69.6%和65.2%的患者获得了优异的结果。前内侧钢板固定病例中没有骨不连和桡神经麻痹的情况,而在前外侧病例中,有1例患者未实现骨愈合,2例(8.7%)出现桡神经损伤,在研究结束时完全恢复。在肱骨平坦的内侧表面采用前外侧入路进行前内侧钢板固定是一种固定肱骨干骨折的良好技术。