• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心电图心率作为急性酒精相关性胰腺炎合并酒精戒断综合征严重程度的预测指标

Electrocardiogram Heart Rate as a Predictor of Severity in Acute Alcohol-Related Pancreatitis With Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.

作者信息

Viswanathan Stalin, Jain Dheeraj, Vinayagamoorthi R, Gayathri Murugesan S

机构信息

General Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, IND.

General Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Pondicherry, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Nov 28;12(11):e11737. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11737.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.11737
PMID:33403169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7773298/
Abstract

Background The severity of acute alcohol-related pancreatitis (AAP) with alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) has not been studied. Electrocardiogram (ECG) has not been used as a predictor of severity in patients with AWS and acute pancreatitis. Objectives The study aimed to determine whether the ECG heart rate (HR) could predict the severity of AAP; secondarily, whether AWS influenced the severity of AAP based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP). Methods Demographics, comorbid illnesses, AWS, biochemistry, ECG, arterial blood gases, and CT findings were noted in patients with AAP. The severity of pancreatitis was scored into mild, moderate, and severe based on CT. BISAP, APACHE II, and ECG heart rate-APACHE (E-APACHE) were compared in patients with and without AWS. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to find the best predictor of severity. Results Among 138 patients (M=128), 94 had AWS. ECG changes (≥1) were seen in 50%. Patients with AWS were younger, had consumed alcohol for a shorter duration, had higher systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), APACHE II, and E-APACHE II scores. APACHE II and E-APACHE II correlated significantly with severity grading, HR, alcohol duration, and AWS. HR was the best predictor of severe pancreatitis; E-APACHE was the best predictor for moderately severe pancreatitis. Conclusions Mostly, AAP appears to be mild; >2/3 have AWS. ECG findings were seen in 50%. HR has not been previously studied in patients with both AAP and AWS and is an easy and inexpensive test to predict the severity of pancreatitis in this cohort.

摘要

背景

急性酒精相关性胰腺炎(AAP)合并酒精戒断综合征(AWS)的严重程度尚未得到研究。心电图(ECG)尚未被用作AWS和急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的预测指标。目的:本研究旨在确定心电图心率(HR)是否能预测AAP的严重程度;其次,基于急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)Ⅱ和急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数(BISAP),探讨AWS是否会影响AAP的严重程度。方法:记录AAP患者的人口统计学资料、合并疾病、AWS、生化指标、心电图、动脉血气分析和CT检查结果。根据CT将胰腺炎的严重程度分为轻度、中度和重度。比较有或无AWS患者的BISAP、APACHEⅡ和心电图心率-APACHE(E-APACHE)。采用受试者工作特征曲线寻找最佳严重程度预测指标。结果:138例患者(男性128例)中,94例有AWS。50%的患者出现心电图改变(≥1项)。有AWS的患者更年轻,饮酒时间更短,全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、APACHEⅡ和E-APACHEⅡ评分更高。APACHEⅡ和E-APACHEⅡ与严重程度分级、心率、饮酒时间和AWS显著相关。心率是重症胰腺炎的最佳预测指标;E-APACHE是中度重症胰腺炎的最佳预测指标。结论:大多数情况下,AAP似乎为轻症;超过2/3的患者有AWS。50%的患者有心电图表现。此前尚未对同时患有AAP和AWS的患者进行心率研究,心率是预测该队列胰腺炎严重程度的一种简便且廉价的检查方法。

相似文献

1
Electrocardiogram Heart Rate as a Predictor of Severity in Acute Alcohol-Related Pancreatitis With Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.心电图心率作为急性酒精相关性胰腺炎合并酒精戒断综合征严重程度的预测指标
Cureus. 2020 Nov 28;12(11):e11737. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11737.
2
Comparison of the BISAP scores for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients according to the latest Atlanta classification.根据最新亚特兰大分类法比较BISAP评分对中国急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的预测价值
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Sep;21(9):689-694. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.118. Epub 2014 May 22.
3
Clinical usefulness of scoring systems to predict severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis with pre and post-test probability assessment.评分系统对预测重症急性胰腺炎的临床实用性:系统评价和荟萃分析,包括前后测试概率评估。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Nov;11(9):825-836. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12464. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
4
Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index, and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis Score in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II、改良计算机断层扫描严重程度指数以及急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度方面的比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;24(2):99-103. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23343.
5
Evaluation of the BISAP scoring system in prognostication of acute pancreatitis - A prospective observational study.BISAP 评分系统对急性胰腺炎预后评估的价值 - 一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
6
[The role of four criteria in assessment of the severity and prognosis of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis].[四项标准在高脂血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后评估中的作用]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 1;55(9):695-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2016.09.008.
7
A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson's score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 revised Atlanta Classification.基于2012年修订的亚特兰大分类法,比较急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、床边指数用于预测急性胰腺炎严重程度(BISAP)、兰森评分(Ranson's score)和改良CTSI。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018 May;6(2):127-131. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gox029. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
8
Procalcitonin and BISAP score versus C-reactive protein and APACHE II score in early assessment of severity and outcome of acute pancreatitis.降钙素原和BISAP评分与C反应蛋白及APACHE II评分在急性胰腺炎严重程度和预后早期评估中的比较
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2012 May;69(5):425-31.
9
Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis.比较 BISAP、Ranson's、APACHE-II 和 CTSI 评分在预测急性胰腺炎器官衰竭、并发症和死亡率中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):435-41; quiz 442. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.622. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
10
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Observational Study.不同评分系统在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究
Cureus. 2020 Feb 10;12(2):e6943. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6943.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishment and Validation of an Early Predictive Model for Severe Acute Pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎早期预测模型的建立与验证
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Jun 4;17:3551-3561. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S457199. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Observational Study.不同评分系统在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究
Cureus. 2020 Feb 10;12(2):e6943. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6943.
2
2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis.2019 WSES 急性胰腺炎严重程度分级与管理指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Jun 13;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0247-0. eCollection 2019.
3
Acute management of pancreatitis: the key to best outcomes.胰腺炎的急性处理:获得最佳结果的关键。
Postgrad Med J. 2019 Jun;95(1124):328-333. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136034. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Clinical Profile and Outcome of Acute Pancreatitis: A Hospital-Based Prospective Observational Study in Subhimalayan State.急性胰腺炎的临床特征与预后:一项基于喜马拉雅山地区某邦医院的前瞻性观察研究
J Assoc Physicians India. 2018 Mar;66(3):22-4.
5
Acute pancreatitis: recent advances through randomised trials.急性胰腺炎:随机试验的最新进展。
Gut. 2017 Nov;66(11):2024-2032. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313595. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
QT interval and drug therapy.QT间期与药物治疗。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 22;353:i2732. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2732.
7
A study of the clinical profile of acute pancreatitis and its correlation with severity indices.急性胰腺炎临床特征及其与严重程度指标的相关性研究。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2015 Oct;9(4):410-7.
8
QT interval changes and reversibility of QT dispersion in patients with acute pancreatitis.
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;25 Suppl 1:59-62. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2014.4960.
9
Role of heart rate variability in predicting the severity of severe acute pancreatitis.心率变异性在预测重症急性胰腺炎严重程度中的作用。
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Oct;59(10):2557-64. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3192-5. Epub 2014 May 13.
10
Acute pancreatitis complicated by acute myocardial infarction - a rare association.急性胰腺炎并发急性心肌梗死——一种罕见的关联。
Indian Heart J. 2013 Jul-Aug;65(4):474-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jul 8.