• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 10 年完全仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形与多发性非鹿角形肾结石的结局。

Evaluating outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn vs multiple non-staghorn renal stones: a 10-year study.

机构信息

Urology Research Center, Razi Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2021 Aug;39(8):3071-3077. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03563-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-020-03563-8
PMID:33403437
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL) for staghorn stones and multiple large non-staghorn stones.

METHODS

The records of 886 patients who underwent csPCNL from September 2009 to October 2019 were considered. Out of them, 201 cases met the eligibility criteria and they were divided into three groups: 63 cases of staghorn, 68 cases of multiple medium (20 mm < diameter ≤ 30 mm) non-staghorn and 70 cases of multiple large non-staghorn (> 30 mm) stones. Almost all outcomes and stone-related factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was not any significant difference regarding age, body mass index, history of urinary tract infection, transfusion rate, complication rate, pre and post-surgery serum creatinine, hemoglobin drop and total hospital stay between the three groups. Stone free rate was 98.5% in multiple medium group, 97.1% in multiple large group and 84.1% in staghorn group (P = 0.001). The operation duration was significantly shorter for the multiple medium group (P < 0.001) but it was not significantly different between the multiple large non-staghorn and staghorn group.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that almost all outcomes were not significantly different between the three groups (especially between staghorn and larger non-staghorn ones). These findings reveal that surgeons could choose csPCNL for treatment of staghorn stones and multiple large non-staghorn stones and consider staghorn stones as challenging as multiple large (especially diameter > 30 mm) non-staghorn stones.

摘要

目的

评估完全仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术(csPCNL)治疗鹿角结石和多发性大非鹿角结石的效果。

方法

回顾性分析 2009 年 9 月至 2019 年 10 月期间 886 例行 csPCNL 患者的临床资料。其中 201 例符合纳入标准,分为三组:63 例鹿角结石,68 例多发性中等大小(20mm<直径≤30mm)非鹿角结石,70 例多发性大非鹿角结石(直径>30mm)。分析几乎所有的结果和结石相关因素。

结果

三组间年龄、体重指数、尿路感染史、输血率、并发症发生率、术前和术后血清肌酐、血红蛋白下降和总住院时间无统计学差异。多发性中等大小组结石清除率为 98.5%,多发性大非鹿角结石组为 97.1%,鹿角结石组为 84.1%(P=0.001)。多发性中等大小组的手术时间明显缩短(P<0.001),但与鹿角结石组相比差异无统计学意义。

结论

结果表明,三组间几乎所有结果(尤其是鹿角结石和大非鹿角结石之间)无显著差异。这些发现表明,外科医生可以选择 csPCNL 治疗鹿角结石和多发性大非鹿角结石,并认为鹿角结石与大(尤其是直径>30mm)非鹿角结石一样具有挑战性。

相似文献

1
Evaluating outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn vs multiple non-staghorn renal stones: a 10-year study.评估 10 年完全仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形与多发性非鹿角形肾结石的结局。
World J Urol. 2021 Aug;39(8):3071-3077. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03563-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Is double-J stent mandatory in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for adult patients with staghorn renal stones?成人鹿角状肾结石患者完全仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术中是否需要双 J 支架?
BMC Urol. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01610-9.
3
Comparison of supine and prone positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of staghorn stones.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形结石的比较。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):603-608. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0977-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
4
Clinical comparison of lateral supine position mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and anatrophic nephrolithotomy in the treatment of complete staghorn renal calculi.侧卧位微创经皮肾取石术与后腹腔镜下离断性肾盂成形术治疗鹿角形肾结石的临床对比。
BMC Urol. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01555-z.
5
Single- versus Multiple-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Surgical Management of Staghorn Stones or Complex Caliceal Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.鹿角形结石或复杂性肾盏结石手术治疗中单通道与多通道经皮肾镜取石术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 17;2020:8817070. doi: 10.1155/2020/8817070. eCollection 2020.
6
A comparative study of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the galdakao-modified supine valdivia (GMSV) position and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex nephrolithiasis: a retrospective single-center study.经皮肾镜取石术与改良斜仰卧位下经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的对比研究:一项回顾性单中心研究
Urolithiasis. 2021 Apr;49(2):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01207-5. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
7
Comparison of mini endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery and multitract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy specifically for kidney staghorn stones: a single-centre experience.微通道经皮肾镜碎石术与多通道微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的比较:单中心经验。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01030-7.
8
Suctioning versus traditional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat renal staghorn calculi: A case-matched comparative study.超声引导经皮肾镜碎石取石术与传统微创经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石:一项病例匹配的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.032. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial.后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形结石的围手术期和长期结果:一项单中心随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1441-1447. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience.无侧卧位改良仰卧位下微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:单中心经验。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):585-589. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0966-1. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of postoperative SIRS risk factors in MetS patients undergoing PCNL.预测接受经皮肾镜取石术的代谢综合征患者术后全身炎症反应综合征的危险因素。
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jul 5;53(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01806-0.
2
Is double-J stent mandatory in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for adult patients with staghorn renal stones?成人鹿角状肾结石患者完全仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术中是否需要双 J 支架?
BMC Urol. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01610-9.
3
Correlation Between the Grade of Hydronephrosis with Surgical Outcomes After Ultrasound-guided Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Absence of Hydronephrosis a Risk Factor for Bleeding in Conventional Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.无肾积水是否为传统经皮肾镜取石术出血的危险因素。
Urol J. 2020 Jan 26;17(1):8-13. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4826.
2
The Analysis of Risk Factors for Hemorrhage Associated with Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.微创经皮肾镜取石术相关出血的危险因素分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jan 30;2019:8619460. doi: 10.1155/2019/8619460. eCollection 2019.
3
An Update on Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-analysis.
超声引导下仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术后肾积水程度与手术结果的相关性:一项回顾性观察研究
Medeni Med J. 2023 Jun 20;38(2):120-127. doi: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.85688.
4
Comparison of safety and efficacy of one shot dilation vs. gradual dilation technique in supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术中单次扩张与逐渐扩张技术的安全性和疗效比较。
World J Urol. 2023 Jun;41(6):1659-1666. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04393-0. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
5
Renal puncture access using a blunt needle: proposal of the blunt puncture concept.钝针经皮肾穿刺取石术:钝穿刺概念的提出。
World J Urol. 2022 Apr;40(4):1035-1041. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03927-8. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术的最新进展:一项荟萃分析
Urol J. 2016 Oct 10;13(5):2814-2822.
4
Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: pro.仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:优点
Urol J. 2011 Fall;8(4):257-64.