Lisinski Alexander, Hieronymus Fredrik, Eriksson Elias, Wallerstedt Susanna M
Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 May;143(5):434-443. doi: 10.1111/acps.13275. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
Since several recent meta-analyses report a dose-response relationship for the antidepressant effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), we investigated how these drugs are dosed in clinical practice.
Through linkage of nation- or region-wide registers, we describe SSRI doses in 50,365 individuals residing in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, with an incident diagnosis of depression and initiating SSRI treatment between 2007 and 2016. The primary question was to elucidate to what extent these individuals had been prescribed a daily dose that according to recent meta-analyses is required to elicit the maximum antidepressant effect, that is >20 mg citalopram, >10 mg escitalopram, >10 mg fluoxetine, >10 mg paroxetine or >50 mg sertraline.
In all, 21,049 (54%) out of 38,868 individuals <65 years of age, and 9,131 (79%) out of 11,497 individuals ≥65 years of age, never received an SSRI dose reported to exert maximum antidepressant effect. These prescribing practices were seen for citalopram, escitalopram and sertraline, but not for fluoxetine and paroxetine, and were frequent in both primary and secondary/tertiary care. Suggesting that doses here defined as maximum efficacy doses, when prescribed, are usually not intolerable, between 59% and 68% of individuals <65 years of age received such a dose also for the subsequent prescription, that is as frequently as in those prescribed a sub-maximum efficacy dose (52-69%).
Most patients being prescribed an SSRI to treat their depression never receive the dose that according to recent meta-analyses is most likely to effectively combat their condition. The lack of consensus regarding effective dosing of SSRIs may have contributed to this state of affairs.
由于最近的几项荟萃分析报告了选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)的抗抑郁作用存在剂量反应关系,我们调查了这些药物在临床实践中的给药方式。
通过全国或地区范围的登记系统进行关联,我们描述了居住在瑞典西约塔兰地区的50365名个体的SSRI剂量,这些个体在2007年至2016年间被确诊为抑郁症并开始接受SSRI治疗。主要问题是阐明这些个体中按照最近的荟萃分析需要达到最大抗抑郁效果的每日剂量(即>20毫克西酞普兰、>10毫克艾司西酞普兰、>10毫克氟西汀、>10毫克帕罗西汀或>50毫克舍曲林)的处方比例。
在38868名年龄<65岁的个体中,共有21049名(54%),在11497名年龄≥65岁的个体中,共有9131名(79%)从未接受过据报道能发挥最大抗抑郁效果的SSRI剂量。西酞普兰、艾司西酞普兰和舍曲林存在这些处方习惯,但氟西汀和帕罗西汀不存在,且在初级和二级/三级护理中都很常见。这表明这里定义为最大疗效剂量的剂量在处方时通常并非无法耐受,59%至68%的年龄<65岁的个体在后续处方中也接受了这样的剂量,与接受次最大疗效剂量的个体(52-69%)一样频繁。
大多数被处方使用SSRI治疗抑郁症的患者从未接受过根据最近的荟萃分析最有可能有效对抗其病情的剂量。关于SSRI有效给药缺乏共识可能导致了这种情况。