• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性研究抗抑郁药物治疗伴有抑郁障碍的精神科患者:治疗充分性和结果。

Prospective study of antidepressant treatment of psychiatric patients with depressive disorders: treatment adequacy and outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 22, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 28;23(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05390-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-023-05390-8
PMID:38017416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10683284/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite numerous national depression care guidelines (DCGs), suboptimal antidepressant treatment may occur. We examined DCG concordance and depression treatment outcomes in psychiatric settings.

METHODS

We evaluated treatment received and outcomes of 128 psychiatric out- and inpatients participating in the PEGAD (Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacogenetics of Antidepressant Treatment for Depressive Disorders) study at baseline, two weeks, and eight weeks using interviews and questionnaires. Inclusion criteria were ICD-10 diagnosis of a depressive disorder, a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 symptom (PHQ-9) score ≥ 10, and a new antidepressant prescribed. The primary outcome of the study was within-individual change in PHQ-9 scores.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients had predominately recurrent (83%) and in 19% treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The median preceding duration of the current episode was 6.5 months. At eight weeks, 85% of the patients (n = 107) used a DCG-concordant antidepressant dose. However, due to the scarcity of antidepressant combinations and augmentations, fewer TRD than non-TRD patients (25% vs. 84%, p < 0.005) received adequate antidepressant treatment. Additionally, one-third of the patients received inadequate follow-up. Overall, only 53% received treatment compatible with DCG recommendations for adequate pharmacotherapy and follow-up. The mean decline in PHQ-9 scores (-3.8 ± SD 5.7) was significant (p < 0.0005). Nearly 40% of the patients reached a subthreshold level of depression (PHQ-9 < 10), predicted by a lower baseline PHQ-9 score, recurrent depression, and female sex. However, 45% experienced no significant clinical improvement (PHQ-9 score reduction < 20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that inadequate treatment continues to occur in psychiatric care settings, particularly for TRD patients.

摘要

背景

尽管有许多国家的抑郁护理指南(DCGs),但抗抑郁药的治疗可能并不理想。我们研究了精神科环境中 DCG 的一致性和抑郁治疗结果。

方法

我们使用访谈和问卷评估了参加 PEGAD(抗抑郁治疗对抑郁障碍的药物流行病学和药物遗传学)研究的 128 名精神科门诊和住院患者在基线、两周和八周时的治疗情况和治疗结果。研究的主要结果是个体内 PHQ-9 评分的变化。

结果

在基线时,患者主要患有复发性(83%)和 19%的治疗抵抗性抑郁(TRD)。当前发作的中位数前期持续时间为 6.5 个月。八周时,85%的患者(n=107)使用了与 DCG 一致的抗抑郁药剂量。然而,由于抗抑郁药联合用药和增效剂的稀缺,接受足够抗抑郁治疗的 TRD 患者少于非 TRD 患者(25%对 84%,p<0.005)。此外,三分之一的患者接受了不足的随访。总体而言,只有 53%的患者接受了与 DCG 建议的充分药物治疗和随访相符的治疗。PHQ-9 评分的平均下降(-3.8±5.7)有统计学意义(p<0.0005)。近 40%的患者达到了抑郁的亚阈值水平(PHQ-9<10),这与基线 PHQ-9 评分较低、复发性抑郁和女性性别有关。然而,45%的患者没有明显的临床改善(PHQ-9 评分下降<20%)。

结论

我们的发现表明,在精神科护理环境中,治疗不足的情况仍然存在,特别是对于 TRD 患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e3c/10683284/01a0fb2e2d93/12888_2023_5390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e3c/10683284/6df1b29a8a92/12888_2023_5390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e3c/10683284/01a0fb2e2d93/12888_2023_5390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e3c/10683284/6df1b29a8a92/12888_2023_5390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e3c/10683284/01a0fb2e2d93/12888_2023_5390_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prospective study of antidepressant treatment of psychiatric patients with depressive disorders: treatment adequacy and outcomes.前瞻性研究抗抑郁药物治疗伴有抑郁障碍的精神科患者:治疗充分性和结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 28;23(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05390-8.
2
Association of Treatment-Resistant Depression With Patient Outcomes and Health Care Resource Utilization in a Population-Wide Study.在一项基于人群的研究中,治疗抵抗性抑郁症与患者结局和医疗资源利用的关系。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 1;80(2):167-175. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.3860.
3
Meaningful Change in Depression Symptoms Assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Among Patients with Treatment Resistant Depression in Two, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Trials of Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant.在两项使用 Esketamine 鼻喷雾剂联合新型口服抗抑郁药的随机、双盲、活性对照试验中,对于治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者,使用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)和蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评估抑郁症状的有意义变化。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 15;281:767-775. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.066. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
4
A clinical approach to treatment resistance in depressed patients: What to do when the usual treatments don't work well enough?针对抑郁患者治疗抵抗的临床方法:当常规治疗效果不够好时该怎么办?
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;22(7):483-494. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2020.1851052. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
Susceptibility to Treatment-Resistant Depression Within Families.家族内治疗抵抗性抑郁症的易感性。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 1;81(7):663-672. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0378.
6
How well do clinical and demographic characteristics predict Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores among patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder in a real-world setting?在真实环境中,临床和人口统计学特征能在多大程度上预测治疗抵抗性重度抑郁症患者的患者健康问卷-9 评分?
Brain Behav. 2021 Feb;11(2):e02000. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2000. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
7
A randomised controlled trial of Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy for treatment resistant depression: the Halifax Depression Study.强化短期动力心理治疗难治性抑郁症的随机对照试验:哈利法克斯抑郁症研究
J Affect Disord. 2017 May;214:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.035. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
Current treatments used in clinical practice for major depressive disorder and treatment resistant depression in England: A retrospective database study.当前在英格兰用于治疗重度抑郁症和治疗抵抗性抑郁症的临床实践中的治疗方法:一项回顾性数据库研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jul;139:172-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.026. Epub 2021 May 22.
9
An episode level evaluation of the treatment journey of patients with major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression.对伴有或不伴有抗药性的重度抑郁症患者治疗历程的片段式评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0220763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220763. eCollection 2019.
10
Epidemiology of treatment resistant depression among major depressive disorder patients in Israel.以色列重度抑郁症患者中治疗抵抗性抑郁症的流行病学。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 11;22(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04184-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes in Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于测量的护理以改善重度抑郁症的抗抑郁治疗效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2529427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29427.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmentation and combination treatments for early-stage treatment-resistant depression.系统评价和荟萃分析早期治疗抵抗性抑郁症的增效和联合治疗。
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Mar;37(3):268-278. doi: 10.1177/02698811221104058. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
2
Courses of treatment and risk factors for treatment-resistant depression in Finnish primary and special healthcare: A nationwide cohort study.芬兰初级和专科保健中的治疗过程和治疗抵抗性抑郁症的风险因素:一项全国性队列研究。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 1;308:236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
3
Combining Antidepressants vs Antidepressant Monotherapy for Treatment of Patients With Acute Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
联合抗抑郁药与抗抑郁药单药治疗急性抑郁症患者的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):300-312. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.4313.
4
Augmentation strategies for treatment resistant major depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.治疗抵抗性重度抑郁症的增强策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Apr 1;302:385-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.134. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Serotonin-Dopamine Activity Modulators in Major Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.辅助性 5-羟色胺-多巴胺活性调节剂治疗重性抑郁障碍的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jun;62(6):721-732. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2022. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
6
Remission and Treatment Augmentation of Depression in the United States.美国抑郁症的缓解与治疗强化
J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 2;82(6):21m13988. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21m13988.
7
The effectiveness of enhanced evidence-based care for depressive disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.强化基于证据的抑郁症护理的效果:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 16;11(1):531. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01638-7.
8
The Efficacy of Measurement-Based Care for Depressive Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.基于测量的抑郁症治疗效果的研究:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 28;82(5):21r14034. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21r14034.
9
Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Treatments for Major Depression: Antidepressants plus Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs. Esketamine vs. Lithium.抗抑郁药联合第二代抗精神病药与 Esketamine 及锂盐治疗重性抑郁症的疗效和耐受性比较。
J Psychopharmacol. 2021 Aug;35(8):890-900. doi: 10.1177/02698811211013579. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
10
Treatment-resistant depression and risk of all-cause mortality and suicidality in Danish patients with major depression.丹麦重度抑郁症患者中难治性抑郁症与全因死亡率及自杀倾向风险
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Mar;135:197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Jan 19.