Wei Zhao, Jang Hyungseok, Bydder Graeme M, Yang Wenhui, Ma Ya-Jun
Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Institute of Electrical Engineering Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Jun;85(6):3290-3298. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28655. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
To describe a new method for accurate T measurement of cortical bone that fits the data sets of both 3D UTE actual flip angle imaging (UTE-AFI) and UTE with a single TR (UTE-STR) simultaneously (UTE-AFI-STR).
To make both the constant values and longitudinal mapping functions in the signal equations for UTE-AFI and UTE-STR identical, the same RF pulses and flip angles were used. Therefore, there were three unknowns in the three equations. This was sufficient to fit the data. Numerical simulation as well as ex vivo and in vivo cortical bone studies were performed to validate the T measurement accuracy with the UTE-AFI-STR method. The original UTE-AFI variable TR (VTR) (ie, combined UTE-AFI and UTE with VTR) and simultaneous fitting (sf) of UTE-AFI and UTE-VTR (sf-UTE-AFI-VTR) methods were performed for comparison.
The numerical simulation study showed that the UTE-AFI-STR method provided accurate value of T when the SNR of the UTE-STR image was higher than 40. The ex vivo study showed that the UTE-AFI-STR method measured the T of cortical bone accurately, with difference ratios ranging from -5.0% to 0.4%. The in vivo study showed a mean T of 246 ms with the UTE-AFI-STR method, and mean difference ratios of 2.4% and 5.0%, respectively, compared with the other two methods.
The 3D UTE-AFI-STR method provides accurate mapping of the T of cortical bone with improved time efficiency compared with the UTE-AFI-VTR/sf-UTE-AFI-VTR methods.
描述一种用于精确测量皮质骨T值的新方法,该方法能同时拟合三维UTE实际翻转角成像(UTE-AFI)和单TR的UTE(UTE-STR)的数据集(UTE-AFI-STR)。
为使UTE-AFI和UTE-STR信号方程中的常数和纵向映射函数相同,采用了相同的射频脉冲和翻转角。因此,三个方程中有三个未知数。这足以拟合数据。进行了数值模拟以及离体和体内皮质骨研究,以验证UTE-AFI-STR方法测量T值的准确性。采用原始的UTE-AFI可变TR(VTR)(即UTE-AFI与VTR相结合)以及UTE-AFI和UTE-VTR的同时拟合(sf)(sf-UTE-AFI-VTR)方法进行比较。
数值模拟研究表明,当UTE-STR图像的信噪比高于40时,UTE-AFI-STR方法能提供准确的T值。离体研究表明,UTE-AFI-STR方法能准确测量皮质骨的T值,差异率在-5.0%至0.4%之间。体内研究表明,UTE-AFI-STR方法测得的平均T值为246毫秒,与其他两种方法相比,平均差异率分别为2.4%和5.0%。
与UTE-AFI-VTR/sf-UTE-AFI-VTR方法相比,三维UTE-AFI-STR方法能更准确地绘制皮质骨的T值图谱,且时间效率更高。