• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

声学呼吸音指数在巴西葡萄牙语中的验证。

Validation of the acoustic breathiness index to the Brazilian Portuguese language.

作者信息

Englert Marina, Barsties V Latoszek Ben, Maryn Youri, Behlau Mara

机构信息

Unifesp - "Universidade Federal de São Paulo" and CEV - "Centro de Estudos da Voz", São Paulo, Brazil.

Speech-Language Pathology, SRH University of Applied Health Sciences, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2022 Apr;47(1):56-62. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2020.1864467. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1080/14015439.2020.1864467
PMID:33404289
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the concurrent validity and the diagnostic accuracy of the Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) in Brazilian Portuguese.

METHODS

The counting numbers 1-20 and the vowel /a/ of 150 subjects were recorded (37 vocally healthy and 113 with dysphonia). The analyzed samples were the counting number 1-11 and 3 s of the sustained vowel. Nine voice specialists performed the perceptual judgment of the degree of breathiness. The Spearman Correlation and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to assess ABI's concurrent validity and diagnosis accuracy.

RESULTS

Results from five listeners were chosen for the study analyses due to moderate and substantial intra-rater reliability (Cohen's Kappa values = 0.520-0.772) and moderate inter-rater reliability (Fleiss Kappa = 0.353). The ABI presented a high concurrent validity ( = 0.746); 55.6% of the breathiness vocal deviation can be explained by the acoustic analysis ( = 0.556). The ROC curve presented good diagnostic accuracy (85.2%). At a threshold of 2.94, the sensitivity was 75.3% and the specificity was 93.4%.

CONCLUSION

The ABI is a valid tool for screening and patient's follow-up regarding breathy vocal qualities in the Brazilian Portuguese language.

摘要

目的

评估巴西葡萄牙语中声学呼吸音指数(ABI)的同时效度和诊断准确性。

方法

记录了150名受试者(37名嗓音健康者和113名发声障碍者)从1数到20以及元音/a/的发音。分析的样本是从1数到11的计数以及持续3秒的元音。九位嗓音专家对呼吸音程度进行了感知判断。使用斯皮尔曼相关性和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来评估ABI的同时效度和诊断准确性。

结果

由于评分者内信度适中且较高(科恩kappa值=0.520 - 0.772)以及评分者间信度适中(弗莱iss kappa = 0.353),选择了五位听众的结果进行研究分析。ABI呈现出较高的同时效度(= 0.746);55.6%的呼吸音嗓音偏差可以通过声学分析来解释(= 0.556)。ROC曲线呈现出良好的诊断准确性(85.2%)。在阈值为2.94时,敏感性为75.3%,特异性为93.4%。

结论

ABI是一种用于巴西葡萄牙语中呼吸音嗓音质量筛查和患者随访的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Validation of the acoustic breathiness index to the Brazilian Portuguese language.声学呼吸音指数在巴西葡萄牙语中的验证。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2022 Apr;47(1):56-62. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2020.1864467. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language.《嗓音声学质量指数量表(03.01 版)》的巴西葡萄牙语验证。
J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):160.e15-160.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
3
Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Acoustic Breathiness Index: Analysis With Different Speech Material in the Brazilian Portuguese.声学嗓音质量指数和声学呼吸音指数:巴西葡萄牙语不同语音材料的分析
J Voice. 2020 Sep;34(5):810.e11-810.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.验证韩国人群中的嗓音障碍指数 3.01 版和声扰指数。
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):660.e9-660.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
5
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German.德语版声学嗓音质量指数 03.01 版和声学粗糙声指数的验证。
J Voice. 2020 Jan;34(1):157.e17-157.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.026. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Spanish language.西班牙语版声学嗓音质量指数03.01版及声学呼吸音指数的验证
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018 May;127(5):317-326. doi: 10.1177/0003489418761096. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
7
Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments.探索声学测量和其他语音评估的有效性。
J Voice. 2024 May;38(3):567-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.12.014. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
The Impact of Languages and Cultural Backgrounds on Voice Quality Analyses.语言和文化背景对嗓音质量分析的影响。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022;74(2):141-152. doi: 10.1159/000518206. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
9
Auditory Perception of Roughness and Breathiness by Dysphonic Women.嗓音粗糙和气息声感知的研究:嗓音障碍女性的感知。
J Voice. 2024 Sep;38(5):1249.e1-1249.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
10
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Immediate effect of inspiratory exercise with exerciser and respiratory encourager in women without vocal complaints.无发声抱怨女性使用呼吸训练器和呼吸激励器进行吸气练习的即时效果。
Codas. 2024 May 20;36(4):e20230148. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023148pt. eCollection 2024.
2
Videokymographic index of glottic function: an analysis of diagnostic accuracy.声门运动录像指数:诊断准确性分析。
Codas. 2022 Oct 17;35(1):e20210214. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021214pt. eCollection 2022.