Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto Street, Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Mar;238(3):887-897. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05740-4. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Laboratory research in adults indicates that alcohol-related subjective effects are enhanced under some social conditions. However, it is unknown whether this "social facilitation" of alcohol effects occurs in adolescents and is associated with alcohol use in the natural ecology.
We examined associations of social facilitation of alcohol-related subjective effects with subsequent alcohol use among a relatively high-risk group of adolescents who reported drinking alcohol both with friends and alone.
Los Angeles high school students from a prospective study (N = 142; 51% female; 10th graders) completed a baseline survey that assessed alcohol-related "positive" and "negative" subjective effects in two contexts: social (alcohol with friends) and solitary (alcohol alone); social facilitation was calculated as the difference between social and solitary. Students then completed five semi-annual surveys spanning 30 months (2014-2017) assessing 30-day alcohol use (days used, number of drinks, binge drinking).
Greater social facilitation of positive effects was significantly associated with greater number of alcohol use days (RR [95% CI] = 1.48 [1.19, 1.82]; p < .001), greater number of drinks (RR [95% CI] = 1.38 [1.14, 1.66]; p = .001), and greater odds of binge drinking (OR [95% CI] = 1.75 [1.20, 2.57]; p = .004). Similar associations were found with social positive effects. There were no significant associations between solitary positive effects-or any negative effects-and alcohol use outcomes.
Social facilitation can be measured outside of the laboratory. Relatively high-risk drinking adolescents who are more susceptible to the social facilitation of subjective alcohol effects are more likely to use more alcohol and binge drink.
成人实验室研究表明,在某些社会条件下,与酒精相关的主观效应会增强。然而,目前尚不清楚这种酒精效应的“社会促进”是否会在青少年中发生,以及它是否与自然生态中的酒精使用有关。
我们研究了与酒精相关的主观效应的社会促进与报告同时与朋友和独自饮酒的青少年中随后的酒精使用之间的关联。
来自前瞻性研究的洛杉矶高中生(N=142;51%为女性;10 年级)完成了一项基线调查,该调查评估了两种情况下与酒精相关的“积极”和“消极”主观效应:社交(与朋友一起饮酒)和独处(独自饮酒);社交促进作用是通过社交和独处之间的差异来计算的。然后,学生在 30 个月(2014-2017 年)内完成了五次半年度调查,评估了 30 天的饮酒量(饮酒天数、饮酒量、 binge 饮酒)。
积极的社会促进作用越大,与更多的饮酒天数(RR[95%CI] = 1.48[1.19, 1.82];p<0.001)、更多的饮酒量(RR[95%CI] = 1.38[1.14, 1.66];p=0.001)和 binge 饮酒的几率更大(OR[95%CI] = 1.75[1.20, 2.57];p=0.004)显著相关。与社交积极影响相关的结果类似。在独处时的积极影响或任何消极影响与酒精使用结果之间没有显著关联。
可以在实验室外测量社会促进作用。更容易受到主观酒精效应的社会促进作用影响的风险较高的饮酒青少年更有可能使用更多的酒精并 binge 饮酒。