Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, 1800, Ooazaaoyagi, Yamagata, 990-2292, Japan.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Surg Today. 2021 Aug;51(8):1300-1308. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02216-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
The purpose of this study was to assess whether the anesthetic type is associated with the prognosis of pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Clinicopathological data from 431 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy for NSCLC between 2010 and 2016 were collected. Patients were classified into groups according to the type of anesthesia: propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or inhalation anesthesia (INHA). We investigated the prognostic differences between these two groups.
A total of 72 patients in the TIVA group and 158 patients in the INHA group were eligible for the analysis. Recurrence was observed in 4 (5.6%) patients in the TIVA group and 19 (12.0%) patients in the INHA group (P = 0.159), and all-cause death occurred in 4 (5.6%) patients in the TIVA group and 24 (15.2%) patients in the INHA group (P = 0.049). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival rates of the TIVA/INHA groups were 91.7%/77.4% and 94.4%/83.5%, respectively. TIVA was associated with a significantly better prognosis. A multivariable analysis of factors associated with RFS revealed that the type of anesthesia as a significant prognostic factor (P = 0.047).
Propofol-based TIVA was associated with a better prognosis in comparison to INHA in patients with surgically resected pathological stage I NSCLC.
本研究旨在评估麻醉类型是否与病理Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的预后相关。
收集了 2010 年至 2016 年间接受 NSCLC 肺叶切除术的 431 例连续患者的临床病理数据。根据麻醉类型将患者分为两组:依托咪酯为基础的全静脉麻醉(TIVA)或吸入麻醉(INHA)。我们研究了这两组之间的预后差异。
共有 72 例 TIVA 组患者和 158 例 INHA 组患者符合分析条件。TIVA 组有 4(5.6%)例患者复发,INHA 组有 19(12.0%)例患者复发(P=0.159),TIVA 组有 4(5.6%)例患者全因死亡,INHA 组有 24(15.2%)例患者全因死亡(P=0.049)。TIVA/INHA 组的 5 年无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率分别为 91.7%/77.4%和 94.4%/83.5%。TIVA 与更好的预后相关。多变量分析 RFS 的相关因素显示,麻醉类型是一个显著的预后因素(P=0.047)。
与 INHA 相比,依托咪酯为基础的 TIVA 与手术切除的病理Ⅰ期 NSCLC 患者的预后更好。