Suppr超能文献

全麻复合硬膜外麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉对非小细胞肺癌患者细胞免疫及预后的影响:一项对比研究。

Effects of combined general-epidural anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia on cellular immunity and prognosis in patients with non‑small cell lung cancer: A comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi, Shandong 276003, P.R. China.

Department of Orthopedics, Chinese Medicine Hospital in Linyi, Linyi, Shandong 276003, P.R. China.

出版信息

Mol Med Rep. 2017 Oct;16(4):4445-4454. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7144. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of combined general‑epidural anesthesia (CGEA) and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on cellular immunity and prognosis in patients with non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a Chinese population. One‑hundred and twenty NSCLC patients were randomly divided into a TIVA group (n=60) and a CGEA group (n=60) using a random number table. All patients underwent video‑assisted thoracoscopic surgery for radical resection. Blood pressure (BP) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured. Post‑operative analgesic effects were evaluated with a visual analog scale pain score. Flow cytometry was applied to measure T lymphocyte subsets [cluster of differentiation (CD)3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+] and natural killer cell CD56+. A 3‑year follow‑up was conducted to observe the prognosis. The analgesic effects of CGEA were identified to be better than those of TIVA. Compared with the TIVA group, the CGEA group demonstrated a shorter time of spontaneous breathing recovery, eyes opening, and extubation, lower heart rate, blood pressure and mean arterial pressure, and higher SpO2. At 24 and 48 h after surgery, CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ and CD56+ in the CGEA group were higher than those in the TIVA group. At 72 h after surgery, CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ in the CGEA group were higher than those in the TIVA group. These results indicate that CGEA and TIVA effected cellular immunity, and CGEA had a reduced effect on cellular immunity and improved postoperative analgesic effects.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在中国人群中,全身麻醉复合硬膜外麻醉(CGEA)与全凭静脉麻醉(TIVA)对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者细胞免疫及预后的影响。采用随机数字表法将 120 例 NSCLC 患者随机分为 TIVA 组(n=60)和 CGEA 组(n=60)。所有患者均接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术根治性切除。测量血压(BP)和外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)。采用视觉模拟评分法评估术后镇痛效果。采用流式细胞术检测 T 淋巴细胞亚群[分化群(CD)3+、CD4+、CD8+和 CD4+/CD8+]和自然杀伤细胞 CD56+。进行 3 年随访观察预后。结果表明,CGEA 的镇痛效果优于 TIVA。与 TIVA 组相比,CGEA 组自主呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔管时间更短,心率、血压、平均动脉压更低,SpO2 更高。术后 24、48 h,CGEA 组 CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+和 CD56+均高于 TIVA 组。术后 72 h,CGEA 组 CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+高于 TIVA 组。这些结果表明,CGEA 和 TIVA 均影响细胞免疫,且 CGEA 对细胞免疫的影响较小,术后镇痛效果更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61f7/5647004/e94e119304d1/MMR-16-04-4445-g00.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验