Microbiology Service, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Universitat de Valencia-CSIC, Valencia, Spain.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;40(3):485-494. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04128-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Whether antibody levels measured by commercially available enzyme or chemiluminescent immunoassays targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein can act as a proxy for serum neutralizing activity remains to be established for many of these assays. We evaluated the degree of correlation between neutralizing antibodies (NtAb) binding the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein and SARS-CoV-2-S-IgG levels measured by four commercial immunoassays in sera drawn from hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Ninety sera from 51 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were tested by a pseudotyped virus neutralization assay, the LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG, the Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, the MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG, and the COVID-19 ELISA IgG assays. Overall, the results obtained with the COVID-19 ELISA IgG test showed the highest agreement with the NtAb assay (κ, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.63-1). The most sensitive tests were the pseudotyped virus NtAb assay and the COVID-19 ELISA IgG assay (92.2% for both). Overall, the degree correlation between antibody titers resulting in 50% virus neutralization (NtAb) in the pseudotyped virus assay and SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels was strong for the Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA (rho = 0.73) and moderate for the remaining assays (rho = 0.48 to 0.59). The kinetic profile of serum NtAb titers could not be reliably predicted by any of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays. The suitability of SARS-CoV-2-S-IgG commercial immunoassays for inferring neutralizing activity of sera from hospitalized COVID-19 patients varies widely across tests and is influenced by the time of sera collection after the onset of symptoms.
用于商业的酶联免疫吸附试验或化学发光免疫分析方法测定的针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突(S)蛋白的抗体水平是否可以作为血清中和活性的替代物,对于许多这些分析方法而言仍有待确定。我们评估了在来自住院 COVID-19 患者的血清中,中和抗体(NtAb)与 SARS-CoV-2 刺突(S)蛋白结合的程度与四种商业免疫分析方法测量的 SARS-CoV-2-S-IgG 水平之间的相关性。用假型病毒中和测定法、LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG、Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA、MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG 和 COVID-19 ELISA IgG 测定法检测了 90 份来自 51 名住院 COVID-19 患者的血清。总体而言,COVID-19 ELISA IgG 检测结果与 NtAb 检测结果具有最高的一致性(κ,0.85;95%CI,0.63-1)。最敏感的测试是假型病毒中和测定法和 COVID-19 ELISA IgG 检测法(两者均为 92.2%)。总体而言,在假型病毒测定法中导致 50%病毒中和(NtAb)的抗体滴度与 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 水平之间的相关性程度在 Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA 中很强(rho=0.73),而在其余测定法中为中度(rho=0.48 至 0.59)。血清 NtAb 滴度的动力学谱不能被任何 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 免疫分析可靠地预测。SARS-CoV-2-S-IgG 商业免疫分析用于推断住院 COVID-19 患者血清的中和活性的适用性在不同测试之间差异很大,并且受到症状发作后采集血清时间的影响。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021-12-22
Microbiol Spectr. 2021-10-31
Int J Mol Sci. 2023-7-26
Vaccines (Basel). 2022-11-18
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2022-4-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-17
Clin Chem. 2021-1-30
J Clin Virol. 2020-7-6
J Clin Invest. 2020-10-1
J Virol. 2020-8-17