Department of Psychology, Developmental Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 10, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Cogn Process. 2021 May;22(2):299-310. doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-01008-z. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
In an experiment with 114 children aged 9-12 years, we compared the ability to establish local and global coherence of narrative texts between auditory and audiovisual (auditory text and pictures) presentation. The participants listened to a series of short narrative texts, in each of which a protagonist pursued a goal. Following each text, we collected the response time to a query word that was either associated with a near or a distant causal antecedent of the final sentence. Analysis of these response times indicated that audiovisual presentation has advantages over auditory presentation for accessing information relevant for establishing both local and global coherence, but there are indications that this effect may be slightly more pronounced for global coherence.
在一项针对 114 名 9-12 岁儿童的实验中，我们比较了听觉和视听（听觉文本和图片）呈现方式在建立叙事文本局部和整体连贯性方面的能力。参与者听了一系列简短的叙事文本，其中每个文本的主角都有一个目标。在每篇文本之后，我们收集了对一个查询词的反应时间，该查询词与最后一句话的近因或远因前词有关。对这些反应时间的分析表明，视听呈现方式在获取与建立局部和整体连贯性相关的信息方面优于听觉呈现方式，但有迹象表明，这种效果在全局连贯性方面可能更为明显。
