Faculty of Arts and Education, Alfred Deakin Institute, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10071-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
This review essay critically examines Catherine Mills's Biopolitics (2018) and Camisha Russell's The Assisted Reproduction of Race (2018). Although distinct works, the centrality of race and reproduction provides a point of connection and an opening into reframing contemporary debates within bioethics and biopolitics. In reviewing these books together I hope to show how biopolitical theory and critical philosophy of race can be useful in looking at bioethical problems from a new perspective that open up different kinds of analyses, especially around historically embedded problems like institutional racism and the legacies of colonialism in healthcare.
这篇评论文章批判性地考察了凯瑟琳·米尔斯的《生物政治学》(2018 年)和卡米莎·拉塞尔的《种族的辅助生殖》(2018 年)。尽管这两部作品截然不同,但种族和生殖的核心地位提供了一个连接点和切入点,使我们能够重新构建生物伦理学和生物政治学领域的当代辩论。通过一起评论这两本书,我希望展示生物政治理论和批判种族哲学如何有助于从新的视角看待生物伦理问题,从而展开不同类型的分析,特别是围绕制度性种族主义和医疗保健领域的殖民主义遗产等历史遗留问题。