• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康的社会技术伦理:对生物伦理方法的批判与拓展

The Sociotechnical Ethics of Digital Health: A Critique and Extension of Approaches From Bioethics.

作者信息

Shaw James A, Donia Joseph

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2021 Sep 23;3:725088. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.725088. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2021.725088
PMID:34713196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8521799/
Abstract

The widespread adoption of digital technologies raises important ethical issues in health care and public health. In our view, understanding these ethical issues demands a perspective that looks beyond the technology itself to include the sociotechnical system in which it is situated. In this sense, a sociotechnical system refers to the broader collection of material devices, interpersonal relationships, organizational policies, corporate contracts, and government regulations that shape the ways in which digital health technologies are adopted and used. Bioethical approaches to the assessment of digital health technologies are typically confined to ethical issues raised by features of the technology itself. We suggest that an ethical perspective confined to functions of the technology is insufficient to assess the broader impact of the adoption of technologies on the care environment and the broader health-related ecosystem of which it is a part. In this paper we review existing approaches to the bioethics of digital health, and draw on concepts from design ethics and science & technology studies (STS) to critique a narrow view of the bioethics of digital health. We then describe the sociotechnical system produced by digital health technologies when adopted in health care environments, and outline the various considerations that demand attention for a comprehensive ethical analysis of digital health technologies in this broad perspective. We conclude by outlining the importance of social justice for ethical analysis from a sociotechnical perspective.

摘要

数字技术的广泛应用在医疗保健和公共卫生领域引发了重要的伦理问题。在我们看来,理解这些伦理问题需要一种超越技术本身的视角,将其所处的社会技术系统纳入考量。从这个意义上讲,社会技术系统指的是更广泛的物质设备、人际关系、组织政策、公司合同以及政府法规的集合,这些因素塑造了数字健康技术的采用和使用方式。生物伦理方法对数字健康技术的评估通常局限于技术本身特性所引发的伦理问题。我们认为,仅局限于技术功能的伦理视角不足以评估技术采用对护理环境以及它所属的更广泛健康相关生态系统的更广泛影响。在本文中,我们回顾了数字健康生物伦理的现有方法,并借鉴设计伦理和科学技术研究(STS)的概念,对数字健康生物伦理的狭隘观点进行批判。然后,我们描述了数字健康技术在医疗保健环境中采用时所产生的社会技术系统,并概述了在这一广阔视角下对数字健康技术进行全面伦理分析时需要关注的各种考量因素。我们通过概述社会正义在从社会技术视角进行伦理分析中的重要性来得出结论。

相似文献

1
The Sociotechnical Ethics of Digital Health: A Critique and Extension of Approaches From Bioethics.数字健康的社会技术伦理:对生物伦理方法的批判与拓展
Front Digit Health. 2021 Sep 23;3:725088. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.725088. eCollection 2021.
2
Non-empirical methods for ethics research on digital technologies in medicine, health care and public health: a systematic journal review.非经验方法在医学、医疗保健和公共卫生领域数字技术伦理研究中的应用:系统期刊评价。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Dec;27(4):513-528. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10222-x. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
3
Digital bioethics: introducing new methods for the study of bioethical issues.数字生物伦理学:引入研究生物伦理问题的新方法。
J Med Ethics. 2023 Nov;49(11):783-790. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107387. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
4
A more-than-human approach to bioethics: The example of digital health.超越人类的生物伦理学方法:数字健康为例。
Bioethics. 2020 Nov;34(9):969-976. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12798. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
On the imperative of thinking through the ethical, health equity, and social justice possibilities and limits of digital technologies in public health.在公共卫生领域,必须思考数字技术在伦理、健康公平和社会正义方面的可能性和局限性。
Can J Public Health. 2021 Jun;112(3):412-416. doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00487-7. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
6
[Analysis of the challenges and dilemmas that bioethics of the 21st century will face in the digital health era].[21世纪生物伦理学在数字健康时代将面临的挑战与困境分析]
Aten Primaria. 2024 Jul;56(7):102901. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.102901. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
7
Understanding digital health: Productive tensions at the intersection of sociology of health and science and technology studies.理解数字健康:健康社会学和科学技术研究交叉点上的富有成效的紧张关系。
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Oct;41 Suppl 1:1-15. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12898.
8
Equity and population health: toward a broader bioethics agenda.公平与人群健康:迈向更广泛的生物伦理学议程。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Jul-Aug;36(4):22-35. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2006.0058.
9
Bioethics for human geneticists: models for reasoning and methods for teaching.人类遗传学家的生物伦理学:推理模型与教学方法
Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Jan;54(1):137-47.
10
How to connect bioethics and environmental ethics: health, sustainability, and justice.如何将生物伦理学与环境伦理学联系起来:健康、可持续性与正义。
Bioethics. 2009 Nov;23(9):497-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01759.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health literacy is linked to attitudes regarding the ethical aspects of digital health among patients with dermatologic comorbidities.数字健康素养与患有皮肤病合并症患者对数字健康伦理方面的态度相关。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 5;20(9):e0330916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330916. eCollection 2025.
2
Top 10 Public Health Challenges for 2024: Charting a New Direction for Global Health Security.2024年十大公共卫生挑战:绘制全球卫生安全新方向
Public Health Chall. 2024 Dec 30;4(1):e70022. doi: 10.1002/puh2.70022. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Impact of a "Digital Health" Curriculum on Students' Perception About Competence and Relevance of Digital Health Topics for Future Professional Challenges: Prospective Pilot Study.“数字健康”课程对学生关于数字健康主题对未来职业挑战的能力和相关性认知的影响:前瞻性试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 12;9:e58940. doi: 10.2196/58940.
4
Examining Practices Related to Ethical Aspects in eHealth Evaluation Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review.电子健康评估研究中与伦理方面相关的审查实践:一项范围审查的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 5;14:e60849. doi: 10.2196/60849.
5
The gaps and challenges in digital health technology use as perceived by patients: a scoping review and narrative meta-synthesis.患者所感知的数字健康技术使用中的差距与挑战:一项范围综述与叙述性元综合分析
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 27;7:1474956. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1474956. eCollection 2025.
6
A broader approach to ethical challenges in digital mental health.应对数字心理健康领域伦理挑战的更广泛方法。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;23(3):394-395. doi: 10.1002/wps.21237.
7
Digital health in stroke: a narrative review.脑卒中的数字健康:叙述性综述。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2024 Aug;82(8):1-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1789201. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
8
From an idea to the marketplace: Identifying and addressing ethical and regulatory considerations across the digital health product-development lifecycle.从概念到市场:识别并解决数字健康产品开发生命周期中的伦理和监管考量因素。
BMC Digit Health. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.1186/s44247-024-00098-5. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
9
Non-empirical methods for ethics research on digital technologies in medicine, health care and public health: a systematic journal review.非经验方法在医学、医疗保健和公共卫生领域数字技术伦理研究中的应用:系统期刊评价。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Dec;27(4):513-528. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10222-x. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
10
Expanding a Behavioral View on Digital Health Access: Drivers and Strategies to Promote Equity.拓展数字健康获取的行为视角:促进公平的驱动因素与策略
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 1;26:e51355. doi: 10.2196/51355.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Issues in Democratizing Digital Phenotypes and Machine Learning in the Next Generation of Digital Health Technologies.下一代数字健康技术中数字表型民主化与机器学习的伦理问题
Philos Technol. 2021;34(4):1945-1960. doi: 10.1007/s13347-021-00445-8. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
2
Recommendations for Health Equity and Virtual Care Arising From the COVID-19 Pandemic: Narrative Review.COVID-19大流行引发的健康公平与虚拟医疗建议:叙述性综述
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Apr 5;5(4):e23233. doi: 10.2196/23233.
3
Race, Reproduction, and Biopolitics: A Review Essay.种族、生殖与生命政治:一篇评论文章。
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10071-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Race, Power, and COVID-19: A Call for Advocacy within Bioethics.种族、权力与 COVID-19:生物伦理学中的倡导呼吁
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Feb;21(2):11-18. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1851810. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
Identifying Ethical Considerations for Machine Learning Healthcare Applications.识别机器学习医疗应用的伦理问题。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Nov;20(11):7-17. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1819469.
6
Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech's newfound role as global health policy makers.被隐私问题打个措手不及?数字接触者追踪、苹果/谷歌应用程序编程接口以及科技巨头作为全球卫生政策制定者的新角色。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(Suppl 1):45-57. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09547-x. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
7
The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review.医疗保健领域人工智能的伦理问题:一项映射性综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Sep;260:113172. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113172. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
From "Infodemics" to Health Promotion: A Novel Framework for the Role of Social Media in Public Health.从“信息疫情”到健康促进:社交媒体在公共卫生中的作用新框架
Am J Public Health. 2020 Sep;110(9):1393-1396. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305746. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency.健康保护行为、社交媒体使用与新冠疫情公共卫生紧急事件期间的阴谋论信仰。
Psychol Med. 2021 Jul;51(10):1763-1769. doi: 10.1017/S003329172000224X. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
10
COVID-19 Digital Health Innovation Policy: A Portal to Alternative Futures in the Making.COVID-19 数字健康创新政策:通向未来的另类门户。
OMICS. 2020 Aug;24(8):460-469. doi: 10.1089/omi.2020.0089. Epub 2020 Jun 8.