• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与标准护理相比,心房颤动患者疾病管理计划的长期成本效益-基于随机对照试验的多状态生存模型。

Long-term cost-effectiveness of a disease management program for patients with atrial fibrillation compared to standard care - a multi-state survival model based on a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):87-95. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1860371.

DOI:10.1080/13696998.2020.1860371
PMID:33406944
Abstract

AIM

To assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of an atrial fibrillation disease management program (i.e. the SAFETY program) from the Australian healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

A multistate Markov model was developed based on patient-level data from the SAFETY randomized controlled trial. Predicted long-term survival, dependent on hospital admission history, was estimated by extrapolating parametric survival models. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and life years (LY) were the primary and secondary outcome measures used to estimate the incremental cost-utility/effectiveness ratio (ICUR/ICER). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were undertaken.

RESULTS

The SAFETY program was associated with both higher costs ($94,953 vs. $78,433) and benefits [QALY (3.99 vs 3.60); LY (5.86 vs 5.24)], with an ICUR of $42,513/QALY or ICER of $26,356/LY, compared to standard care. Due to the extended survival, the SAFETY was associated with a greater number of hospitalizations (14.85 vs 11.65) and higher costs for medications ($25,084 vs $22,402) and outpatient care ($12,904 vs $11,524). The cost per hospitalization for an average length of stay, analytical time horizon, and cost of medication are key determinants of ICUR. The PSA showed that the intervention has a 70.4% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of $50,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAFETY program has a high probability of being cost-effective for patients with atrial fibrillation. It is associated with uncertainty that further research could potentially eliminate; implementation with further evidence collection is recommended.

摘要

目的

从澳大利亚医疗保健系统的角度评估房颤疾病管理计划(即 SAFETY 计划)的长期成本效益。

方法

基于 SAFETY 随机对照试验的患者水平数据,开发了多状态马尔可夫模型。通过外推参数生存模型来估计依赖住院史的长期生存预测。质量调整生命年(QALY)和生命年(LY)是用于估计增量成本效用/效果比(ICUR/ICER)的主要和次要结果测量指标。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析(PSA)。

结果

与标准护理相比,SAFETY 计划与更高的成本(94953 美元与 78433 美元)和更高的效益[QALY(3.99 与 3.60);LY(5.86 与 5.24)]相关,ICUR 为 42513 美元/QALY 或 ICER 为 26356 美元/LY。由于延长了生存,SAFETY 与更多的住院治疗(14.85 次与 11.65 次)和更高的药物费用(25084 美元与 22402 美元)和门诊护理费用(12904 美元与 11524 美元)相关。平均住院时间、分析时间范围和药物成本的每住院治疗费用是 ICUR 的关键决定因素。PSA 表明,该干预措施在 50000 美元/QALY 的阈值下具有 70.4%的成本效益可能性。

结论

SAFETY 计划对房颤患者具有很高的成本效益可能性。它存在不确定性,进一步的研究可能会消除这种不确定性;建议在进一步收集证据的基础上实施。

相似文献

1
Long-term cost-effectiveness of a disease management program for patients with atrial fibrillation compared to standard care - a multi-state survival model based on a randomized controlled trial.与标准护理相比,心房颤动患者疾病管理计划的长期成本效益-基于随机对照试验的多状态生存模型。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):87-95. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1860371.
2
Within trial cost-utility analysis of disease management program for patients hospitalized with atrial fibrillation: results from the SAFETY trial.疾病管理计划对心房颤动住院患者的成本效用分析:来自 SAFETY 试验的结果。
J Med Econ. 2019 Sep;22(9):945-952. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1631831. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
3
Modelling the lifetime cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure.建模伴心力衰竭心房颤动导管消融的终生成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 5;9(9):e031033. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031033.
4
Systematic review and cost-effectiveness evaluation of 'pill-in-the-pocket' strategy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation compared to episodic in-hospital treatment or continuous antiarrhythmic drug therapy.“口袋里的药丸”策略与偶发性院内治疗或持续性抗心律失常药物治疗相比,用于阵发性心房颤动的系统评价和成本效益评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(31):iii-iv, 1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta14310.
5
Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran etexilate in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation in Belgium.达比加群酯在比利时预防房颤患者中风和全身性栓塞的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2013;16(3):407-14. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.766200. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
6
Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran versus vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a French payer perspective.达比加群酯与维生素K拮抗剂预防心房颤动患者卒中的成本效益分析:法国医保支付方视角
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Jun-Jul;107(6-7):381-90. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
7
Cost-Effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Olaparib Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance Therapy After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced BRCA1/2-mutated Ovarian Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.在意大利国家卫生服务体系中,一线基于铂类的化疗后,对于新诊断的 BRCA1/2 突变型晚期卵巢癌患者,奥拉帕利维持治疗与无维持治疗的成本效益和净货币收益比较。
Clin Ther. 2020 Jul;42(7):1192-1209.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
8
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
9
Cost-effectiveness of apixaban compared to warfarin in the management of atrial fibrillation in Australia.在澳大利亚,与华法林相比,阿哌沙班在心房颤动管理中的成本效益。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):344-53. doi: 10.1177/2047487313514019. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Versus Cryoballoon Ablation in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis in China.射频导管消融与冷冻球囊消融治疗阵发性心房颤动的成本效果分析。
Clin Ther. 2019 Jan;41(1):78-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the impact of implementing an integrated care management approach with Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway for patients with atrial fibrillation in England from 2020 to 2040.估计 2020 年至 2040 年在英格兰实施房颤综合护理管理方法(Atrial fibrillation Better Care [ABC] 路径)对房颤患者的影响。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 Jun 20;10(4):326-333. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad055.
2
Cost Effectiveness of Strategies to Manage Atrial Fibrillation in Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.中高收入国家管理心房颤动策略的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Aug;41(8):913-943. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01276-5. Epub 2023 May 19.