Department of Biomechanics and Sports Injuries, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Kinesiology Research Center, Department of Sports Biomechanics, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Feb;22(2):182-189. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1872712. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
Vertical stiffness has been highlighted as a potential determinant of performance and may be estimated across a range of different performance tasks. The aim of the current study was to investigate the relationship between vertical stiffness determined during 9 different hopping tests and performance of vertical jumps. Twenty healthy, active males performed vertical hopping tests with three different strategies (self-selected, maximal, and controlled) and three different limb configurations (bilateral, unilateral preferred, and unilateral non-preferred), resulting in nine different variations, during which vertical stiffness was determined. In addition, participants performed squat jump (SQJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) during which jump height, CMJ stiffness, and eccentric utilization ratio (EUR) were determined. Vertical stiffness in bilateral and unilateral preferred tasks performed with a self-selected and maximal, but not controlled, strategy was associated with stiffness in the CMJ ( = 0.61-0.64; < 0.05). However, stiffness obtained during unilateral preferred and non-preferred hopping with self-selected strategy was negatively associated with performance in SQJ and CMJ tasks ( = -0.50 to -0.57; < 0.05). These findings suggest that high levels of vertical stiffness may be disadvantageous to static vertical jumping performance. In addition, unilateral hopping with a self-selected strategy may be the most appropriate task variation if seeking to determine relationships with vertical jumping performance. Stiffness obtained during unilateral hopping with a preferred strategy was negatively associated with vertical jumping performancesStiffness obtained during hopping with preferred and maximal strategies was associated with stiffness obtained during a countermovement jumpIn this population, hopping stiffness may therefore be reflective of an individual's countermovement jump strategyHigh levels of stiffness may be disadvantageous to static-start vertical jumping.
垂直刚度已被强调为性能的潜在决定因素,并且可以在一系列不同的性能任务中进行估计。本研究的目的是调查在 9 种不同的跳跃测试中确定的垂直刚度与垂直跳跃性能之间的关系。20 名健康、活跃的男性以三种不同的策略(自我选择、最大和控制)和三种不同的肢体配置(双侧、单侧优先和单侧非优先)进行垂直跳跃测试,共产生了 9 种不同的变化,在此期间确定了垂直刚度。此外,参与者进行了深蹲跳(SQJ)和下蹲跳(CMJ),在此期间确定了跳跃高度、CMJ 刚度和偏心利用率(EUR)。在自我选择和最大策略下进行的双侧和单侧优先任务中的垂直刚度与 CMJ 中的刚度相关( = 0.61-0.64; < 0.05)。然而,在自我选择策略下进行的单侧优先和非优先跳跃中获得的刚度与 SQJ 和 CMJ 任务的性能呈负相关( = -0.50 至 -0.57; < 0.05)。这些发现表明,高水平的垂直刚度可能不利于静态垂直跳跃性能。此外,如果要确定与垂直跳跃性能的关系,单侧跳跃用自我选择策略可能是最合适的任务变化。在自我选择策略下进行的单侧跳跃中获得的刚度与垂直跳跃性能呈负相关在自我选择和最大策略下进行的跳跃时获得的刚度与在反跳时获得的刚度相关在这个群体中,跳跃刚度可能反映了个体的反跳策略高水平的刚度可能不利于静态起始垂直跳跃。