Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU , Trondheim, Norway.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1868737. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1868737.
The purpose of the study is to explore how professionals working with suicide prevention experience the influence of the national guidelines on mental healthcare, and to gather recommendations for which steps to take next.
This is a qualitative study with an explorative design. We interviewed 22 professionals responsible for implementing suicide prevention action plans and guidelines, and/or conducting relevant research. We analysed the data by means of thematic analysis.
We found that the participants had an ambivalent view on risk assessment-it may be a tool, but it may also compromise other important aspects in prevention. Moreover, the possibility of liability has resulted in the need for self-protection. Instead, the participants recommended a relational approach to suicide prevention.
We found that the emphasis on standardized suicide risk assessment has negatively influenced suicide prevention in mental healthcare, and an approach emphasizing relational aspects is recommended. However, the prevailing objectifying concept of knowledge, the epistemological debate and the emergence of the New Public Management ideology may obstruct a fundamental emphasis on relationships. A paradigm shift in mental healthcare is called for with respect to the concept of knowledge, which forms our understandings and practices.
本研究旨在探讨从事自杀预防工作的专业人员如何体验国家精神卫生保健指南对他们的影响,并为下一步的措施提出建议。
这是一项探索性设计的定性研究。我们采访了 22 名负责实施自杀预防行动计划和指南以及/或进行相关研究的专业人员。我们通过主题分析来分析数据。
我们发现,参与者对风险评估的看法是矛盾的,它可能是一种工具,但也可能损害预防的其他重要方面。此外,法律责任的可能性导致了自我保护的需要。相反,参与者建议采用关系方法来预防自杀。
我们发现,对标准化自杀风险评估的强调对精神卫生保健中的自杀预防产生了负面影响,建议采用强调关系方面的方法。然而,占主导地位的客观主义知识概念、认识论辩论和新公共管理思想的出现,可能会阻碍对关系的根本重视。需要在精神卫生保健方面对知识概念进行范式转变,这关系到我们的理解和实践。