Suppr超能文献

呼吁从非个人风险评估转变为关系方法:专业人员对挪威精神保健中预防自杀国家指南的反思。

A call for change from impersonal risk assessment to a relational approach: professionals' reflections on the national guidelines for suicide prevention in mental health care in Norway.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU , Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1868737. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1868737.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to explore how professionals working with suicide prevention experience the influence of the national guidelines on mental healthcare, and to gather recommendations for which steps to take next.

METHODS

This is a qualitative study with an explorative design. We interviewed 22 professionals responsible for implementing suicide prevention action plans and guidelines, and/or conducting relevant research. We analysed the data by means of thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We found that the participants had an ambivalent view on risk assessment-it may be a tool, but it may also compromise other important aspects in prevention. Moreover, the possibility of liability has resulted in the need for self-protection. Instead, the participants recommended a relational approach to suicide prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the emphasis on standardized suicide risk assessment has negatively influenced suicide prevention in mental healthcare, and an approach emphasizing relational aspects is recommended. However, the prevailing objectifying concept of knowledge, the epistemological debate and the emergence of the New Public Management ideology may obstruct a fundamental emphasis on relationships. A paradigm shift in mental healthcare is called for with respect to the concept of knowledge, which forms our understandings and practices.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨从事自杀预防工作的专业人员如何体验国家精神卫生保健指南对他们的影响,并为下一步的措施提出建议。

方法

这是一项探索性设计的定性研究。我们采访了 22 名负责实施自杀预防行动计划和指南以及/或进行相关研究的专业人员。我们通过主题分析来分析数据。

结果

我们发现,参与者对风险评估的看法是矛盾的,它可能是一种工具,但也可能损害预防的其他重要方面。此外,法律责任的可能性导致了自我保护的需要。相反,参与者建议采用关系方法来预防自杀。

结论

我们发现,对标准化自杀风险评估的强调对精神卫生保健中的自杀预防产生了负面影响,建议采用强调关系方面的方法。然而,占主导地位的客观主义知识概念、认识论辩论和新公共管理思想的出现,可能会阻碍对关系的根本重视。需要在精神卫生保健方面对知识概念进行范式转变,这关系到我们的理解和实践。

相似文献

2
"Time to Try Something New" - Professionals' Experiences and Reflections on Suicide Prevention in Norway.
Crisis. 2021 Nov;42(6):434-440. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000740. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
3
Exploring Uniformity of Clinical Judgment: A Vignette Approach to Understanding Healthcare Professionals' Suicide Risk Assessment Practices.
J Patient Saf. 2022 Sep 1;18(6):e962-e970. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000973. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
4
Mental Health Professionals' Suicide Risk Assessment and Management Practices.
Crisis. 2018 Jan;39(1):55-64. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000478. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
6
Addressing Suicide Risk According to Different Healthcare Professionals in Spain: A Qualitative Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 26;15(10):2117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102117.

引用本文的文献

1
Person-centred suicide prevention: key elements from the perspective of people living with suicidality.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2549752. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2549752. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
3
Using the stress-vulnerability model to better understand suicide in prison populations.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Feb 15;30(3):299-333. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.2013340. eCollection 2023.
4
Suicide Models and Treatment Models Are Separate Entities. What Does It Mean for Clinical Suicide Prevention?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 17;18(10):5301. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105301.

本文引用的文献

1
The construction of people with mental health problems as risk objects: Findings of a case study inquiry.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;25(9-10):558-568. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12501. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
2
Contact With Mental Health Services Prior to Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jul 1;69(7):751-759. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700475. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
Experiences of the bereaved in connection with the suicide of young men.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2018 Feb 5;138(3). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0571. Print 2018 Feb 6.
4
[Not Available].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2018 Jan 22;138(2). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.18.0005. Print 2018 Jan 23.
5
Why Suicide Risk Assessment Still Matters.
J Psychiatr Pract. 2017 Nov;23(6):436-440. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000263.
6
Can we predict suicide?
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 Nov 13;137(21). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0573. Print 2017 Nov 14.
7
Suicide risk assessment among psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-risk categories.
Psychol Med. 2018 May;48(7):1119-1127. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002537. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
Predictors of suicide in the patient population admitted to a locked-door psychiatric acute ward.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0173958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173958. eCollection 2017.
10
Mental Health Nurses' Experiences of Caring for Suicidal Patients in Psychiatric Wards: An Emotional Endeavor.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Feb;31(1):31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验