• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从前列腺活检到根治性前列腺切除术病理预测 Gleason 评分升级:一种新的列线图及其内部验证。

Predicting Gleason sum upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: a new nomogram and its internal validation.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, No. 95, Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00773-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-020-00773-5
PMID:33407381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7789761/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To explore the rate of Gleason sum upgrading (GSU) from biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology and to develop a nomogram for predicting the probability of GSU in a Chinese cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained prostate cancer (PCa) database from October 2012 to April 2020. 198 patients who met the criteria were enrolled. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors. Nomogram was constructed based on independent predictors. The receiver operating curve was undertaken to estimate the discrimination. Calibration curve was used to assess the concordance between predictive probabilities and true risks.

RESULTS

The rate of GSU was 41.4%, whilst GS concordance rate was 44.4%. The independent predictors are prostate specific antigen (PSA), greatest percentage of cancer (GPC), clinical T-stage and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score. Our model showed good discrimination (AUC of 0.735). Our model was validated internally with good calibration with bias-corrected C-index of 0.726.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of basic clinical variables (PSA and T-stage) combined with imaging variable (PI-RADS) and pathological variable (GPC) could improve performance in predicting actual probabilities of GSU in the 24-core biopsy scheme. Our nomogram could help to assess the true risk and make optimal treatment decisions for PCa patients.

摘要

背景

探讨从活检到根治性前列腺切除术病理的 Gleason 总和升级(GSU)率,并为中国队列开发预测 GSU 概率的列线图。

方法

我们回顾性地审查了我们从 2012 年 10 月至 2020 年 4 月前瞻性维护的前列腺癌(PCa)数据库。纳入了符合标准的 198 名患者。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定预测因素。基于独立预测因素构建列线图。进行接收者操作曲线以评估鉴别力。校准曲线用于评估预测概率与真实风险之间的一致性。

结果

GSU 率为 41.4%,而 GS 一致性率为 44.4%。独立预测因素是前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、最大癌症百分比(GPC)、临床 T 分期和前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分。我们的模型显示出良好的鉴别力(AUC 为 0.735)。我们的模型在内部进行了验证,具有良好的校准,偏置校正的 C 指数为 0.726。

结论

利用基本临床变量(PSA 和 T 分期)结合影像学变量(PI-RADS)和病理学变量(GPC)可以提高在 24 芯活检方案中预测实际 GSU 概率的性能。我们的列线图可以帮助评估真实风险并为 PCa 患者做出最佳治疗决策。

相似文献

1
Predicting Gleason sum upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: a new nomogram and its internal validation.从前列腺活检到根治性前列腺切除术病理预测 Gleason 评分升级:一种新的列线图及其内部验证。
BMC Urol. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00773-5.
2
Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy.综合多种临床特征预测前列腺癌患者行系统穿刺活检和根治性前列腺切除术时分级和分期的差异。
Pathol Res Pract. 2020 Nov;216(11):153235. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2020.153235. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
3
Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy in Chinese population: Updated nomograms.中国人群活检与根治性前列腺切除术后Gleason评分升级情况:更新后的列线图
Actas Urol Esp. 2017 Apr;41(3):162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
4
Nomograms for predicting Gleason upgrading in a contemporary Chinese cohort receiving radical prostatectomy after extended prostate biopsy: development and internal validation.当代中国队列中接受扩大前列腺活检后行根治性前列腺切除术患者 Gleason 分级升级预测列线图:构建与内部验证
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 29;7(13):17275-85. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7787.
5
PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像测量的PI-RADS v2和前列腺周围脂肪能够预测活检Gleason评分为3+3的前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后病理分级的提升。
Scand J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;52(5-6):333-339. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1545799.
6
A nomogram to predict Gleason sum upgrading of clinically diagnosed localized prostate cancer among Chinese patients.用于预测中国患者临床诊断的局限性前列腺癌Gleason评分升级的列线图。
Chin J Cancer. 2014 May;33(5):241-8. doi: 10.5732/cjc.013.10137. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
7
Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort.在中国队列中分析根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的危险因素。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7772-7780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4274. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
8
Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.预测前列腺穿刺活检与根治性前列腺切除术后病理结果之间前列腺癌Gleason评分升级概率的列线图的开发与内部验证。
Eur Urol. 2006 May;49(5):820-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.007. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
9
External validation and comparison of two nomograms predicting the probability of Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology in two patient populations: a retrospective cohort study.两项列线图在两个患者群体中预测活检与根治性前列腺切除术后病理Gleason评分升级概率的外部验证与比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov;45(11):1091-5. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv128. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
10
External validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology among Japanese patients.验证预测日本患者前列腺癌活检和根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级概率的列线图的外部验证。
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):404-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.084. Epub 2009 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiparametric MRI to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading and Downgrading at Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Presurgical Biopsy.与术前活检相比,多参数磁共振成像预测前列腺癌根治术时Gleason评分的升级和降级
Korean J Radiol. 2025 May;26(5):422-434. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.1008. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
2
Pathological Assessment of Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.2级前列腺癌男性患者的病理评估
World J Mens Health. 2025 Jul;43(3):595-602. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230216. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
3
The Suppression of the Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Prostate Cancer through the Targeting of MYO6 Using MiR-145-5p.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Prostate Cancer Upgrading and Upstaging on Biochemical Recurrence and Cancer-Specific Survival.前列腺癌升级和升期对生化复发和癌症特异性生存的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Feb 4;56(2):61. doi: 10.3390/medicina56020061.
2
Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer treated with surgery in the United Kingdom: trends and risk factors from the British Association of Urological Surgeons Radical Prostatectomy Registry.英国泌尿外科医师协会根治性前列腺切除术登记处:手术治疗前列腺癌的病理升级:趋势和危险因素。
BMC Urol. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0526-9.
3
Effects of pathological upstaging or upgrading on metastasis and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinical low-risk prostate cancer.
通过使用MiR-145-5p靶向MYO6抑制前列腺癌上皮-间质转化
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Apr 12;25(8):4301. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084301.
4
The Performance of Different Parametric Ultrasounds in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimens.不同参数超声在前列腺癌诊断中的性能:与前列腺癌根治术标本的相关性
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 15;16(8):1502. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081502.
5
Preparing Data for Artificial Intelligence in Pathology with Clinical-Grade Performance.利用临床级性能为病理学中的人工智能准备数据。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 3;13(19):3115. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193115.
6
Prostate Health Index () and its derivatives predict Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy among patients with low-risk prostate cancer.前列腺健康指数()及其衍生指标可预测低危前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后的格里森评分升级。
Asian J Androl. 2022 Jul-Aug;24(4):406-410. doi: 10.4103/aja202174.
临床低危前列腺癌患者病理性升级或分期升级对转移和癌症特异性死亡的影响。
BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):1003-1009. doi: 10.1111/bju.14418. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
4
Contemporary prostate biopsy reporting: insights from a survey of clinicians' use of pathology data.当代前列腺活检报告:临床医生使用病理数据的调查洞察。
J Clin Pathol. 2018 Oct;71(10):874-878. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205093. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.PI-RADS v2 在预测经活检证实的 Gleason 评分 6 级前列腺癌升级中的作用。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Aug;16(4):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
6
Nomograms for predicting Gleason upgrading in a contemporary Chinese cohort receiving radical prostatectomy after extended prostate biopsy: development and internal validation.当代中国队列中接受扩大前列腺活检后行根治性前列腺切除术患者 Gleason 分级升级预测列线图:构建与内部验证
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 29;7(13):17275-85. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7787.
7
Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers.前列腺癌:PI-RADS 版本 2 有助于术前预测临床显著癌症。
Radiology. 2016 Jul;280(1):108-16. doi: 10.1148/radiol.16151133. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
8
Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use.多参数前列腺磁共振成像PI-RADS v2指南概要及使用建议
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
9
Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology.多参数磁共振成像检测多灶性前列腺癌:与全组织病理的相关性。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.079. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
10
Multiparametric 3T MRI for the prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer.多参数3T磁共振成像用于预测经活检证实为Gleason评分3+4前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后的病理降期情况。
Eur Radiol. 2014 Dec;24(12):3161-70. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3367-7. Epub 2014 Aug 7.