The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Trials. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04952-5.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent musculoskeletal condition causing pain, physical disability, and reduced quality of life. Exercise and patient education are non-pharmacological interventions for knee OA unanimously recommended as first-line treatments based on extensive research evidence. However, none of the numerous randomised controlled trials of exercise and education for knee OA has used adequate sham/placebo comparison groups because the 'active' ingredients are unknown. Designing and executing an adequate and 'blindable placebo' version of an exercise and education intervention is impossible. Therefore, using an open-label study design, this trial compares the efficacy of a widely used 'state-of-art' exercise and education intervention (Good Life with osteoarthritis in Denmark; GLAD) with presumably inert intra-articular saline injections on improvement in knee pain in patients with knee OA.
In this open-label randomised trial, we will include 200 patients with radiographically verified OA of the knee and randomly allocate them to one of two interventions: (i) 8 weeks of exercise and education (GLAD) or (ii) Intra-articular injections of 5 ml isotonic saline every second week for a total of 4 injections. Outcomes are taken at baseline, after 8 weeks of treatment (week 9; primary endpoint) and after an additional 4 weeks of follow-up (week 12). The primary outcome is change from baseline in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire (KOOS) pain subscale score. Secondary outcomes include the Physical function in Activities of Daily Living, Symptoms, and Knee-related Quality of Life subscales of the KOOS, the patients' global assessment of disease impact, physical performance tests, and presence of knee joint swelling.
This current trial compares a presumably active treatment (GLAD) with a presumably inert treatment (IA saline injections). Both study interventions have well-established and anticipated similar effects on knee OA symptoms, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. The interpretation of the results of this trial will likely be difficult and controversial but will contribute to a better understanding of the bias introduced in the effect estimation of classically unblindable exercise and education interventions for knee OA.
www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03843931 . Prospectively registered on 18 February 2019.
膝骨关节炎(OA)是一种高发的肌肉骨骼疾病,会引起疼痛、身体残疾和生活质量下降。运动和患者教育是基于广泛的研究证据,一致推荐的膝骨关节炎的非药物干预措施,作为一线治疗方法。然而,由于“活性”成分未知,针对膝骨关节炎的运动和教育的众多随机对照试验中,没有一个使用了足够的假/安慰剂对照。设计和执行一种充分的、可盲法的运动和教育干预的安慰剂版本是不可能的。因此,本试验采用开放标签研究设计,比较了一种广泛使用的“最先进”的运动和教育干预(丹麦的骨关节炎良好生活;GLAD)与膝关节内注射生理盐水的疗效,后者可能是无效的,以改善膝骨关节炎患者的膝关节疼痛。
在这项开放标签的随机试验中,我们将纳入 200 例经影像学证实的膝骨关节炎患者,并将其随机分配到以下两种干预措施之一:(i)8 周的运动和教育(GLAD)或(ii)膝关节内注射 5ml 等渗盐水,每两周一次,共 4 次。结果在基线时、治疗 8 周后(第 9 周;主要终点)和额外 4 周随访后(第 12 周)采集。主要结局是从基线到膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分问卷(KOOS)疼痛分量表评分的变化。次要结局包括 KOOS 的身体功能在日常生活活动、症状和膝关节相关生活质量分量表、患者对疾病影响的总体评估、身体机能测试和膝关节肿胀的存在。
本试验比较了一种假定的治疗方法(GLAD)和一种假定的治疗方法(IA 盐水注射)。两种研究干预措施对膝骨关节炎症状都有既定的、预期的相似效果,但潜在机制尚不清楚。对该试验结果的解释可能很困难和有争议,但将有助于更好地理解对经典不可盲法的膝骨关节炎运动和教育干预措施的效果估计中引入的偏差。
www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03843931。2019 年 2 月 18 日前瞻性注册。