Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic.
Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 6;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02393-8.
Treat-to-target (T2T) is a widely accepted strategy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It recommends attaining a goal of at least low disease activity (LDA) within 6 months; otherwise, the current therapy should be modified. We aimed to investigate whether switching a first-line targeted therapy (TT) in patients not reaching LDA within 6 months leads to a higher probability of meeting LDA at the 12-month visit in daily clinical practice using data from Czech registry ATTRA.
We included patients with RA starting the first-line TT from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2017 with at least 1-year follow-up. We created four mutually exclusive cohorts based on (1) switching to another TT within the first year and (2) reaching a treatment target (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at the 6-month visit. The primary outcome was the comparison of odds for reaching remission (REM) or LDA at the 12-month visit between patients switching and not switching TT after not reaching treatment target at 6 months. Before using logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio, we employed the propensity score to match patients at the 6-month visit.
A total of 1275 patients were eligible for the analysis. Sixty-two patients switched within the first 5 months of the treatment before evaluating treatment response at the 6-month visit (C1); 598 patients reached the treatment target within 6 months of therapy (C2); 124 patients did not reach treatment response at 6-month visit and switched to another therapy (C3), and 491 patients continued with the same treatment despite not reaching LDA at the 6-month visit (C4). We matched 75 patients from cohort C3 and 75 patients from C4 using the propensity score. Patients following the T2T principle (C3) showed 2.8 (95% CI 1.4-5.8; p = 0.005) times increased likelihood of achieving REM/LDA at the 12-month visit compared to patients not following the T2T strategy (C4).
In daily clinical practice, the application of the T2T strategy is underused. Switching TT after not reaching REM/LDA within the first 6 months leads to a higher probability of achieving REM/LDA in RA patients at the 12-month visit.
达标治疗(T2T)是一种被广泛接受的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者治疗策略。它建议在 6 个月内达到至少低疾病活动度(LDA)的目标;否则,应修改当前的治疗方案。我们旨在通过捷克登记处 ATTRA 的数据,研究在 6 个月内未达到 LDA 的患者改用一线靶向治疗(TT)是否会增加在 12 个月时达到 LDA 的可能性。
我们纳入了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 1 月 31 日期间开始接受一线 TT 的 RA 患者,随访时间至少 1 年。我们根据(1)在第 1 年内改用另一种 TT 和(2)在 6 个月时达到治疗目标(DAS28-ESR≤3.2),创建了四个互斥的队列。主要结局是比较在第 6 个月未达到治疗目标后改用 TT 和未改用 TT 的患者在第 12 个月时达到缓解(REM)或 LDA 的可能性。在使用逻辑回归估计优势比之前,我们使用倾向评分在第 6 个月时匹配患者。
共有 1275 名患者符合分析条件。62 名患者在治疗的前 5 个月内改用了治疗方法,然后在第 6 个月时评估治疗反应(C1);598 名患者在治疗 6 个月内达到了治疗目标(C2);124 名患者在第 6 个月时未达到治疗反应并改用了另一种治疗方法(C3),491 名患者尽管在第 6 个月时未达到 LDA,但仍继续使用相同的治疗方法(C4)。我们使用倾向评分匹配了 C3 队列中的 75 名患者和 C4 队列中的 75 名患者。遵循 T2T 原则的患者(C3)在第 12 个月时达到 REM/LDA 的可能性是未遵循 T2T 策略的患者(C4)的 2.8 倍(95%CI 1.4-5.8;p=0.005)。
在日常临床实践中,T2T 策略的应用不足。在第 6 个月内未达到 REM/LDA 后改用 TT 会增加 RA 患者在第 12 个月时达到 REM/LDA 的可能性。