School of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
School of Public Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e043836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043836.
The Western Australia (WA) Acute TeleStroke Programme commenced incrementally across regional WA during 2016-2017. Since the introduction of the TeleStroke Programme, there has been monitoring of service outputs, including regional patient access to tertiary stroke specialist advice and reperfusion treatment; however, the impact of consultation with a stroke specialist via telehealth (videoconferencing or telephone) on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stroke care and the drivers of cost-effectiveness has not been systematically evaluated.
The aim of the case study was to examine the impact of consultation with a stroke specialist via telehealth on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stroke and transient ischaemic attack care using a mixed methods approach. A categorical decision tree model will be constructed in collaboration with clinicians and programme managers. A before and after comparison using state-wide administrative datasets will be used to run the base model. If sample size and statistical power permits, the cases and comparators will be matched by stroke type and presence of CT scan at the initial site of presentation, age category and presenting hospital. The drivers of cost-effectiveness will be explored through stakeholder interviews. Data from the qualitative analysis will be cross-referenced with trends emerging from the quantitative dataset and used to guide the factors to be involved in subgroup and sensitivity analysis.
Ethics approval for this case study has been granted from the Western Australian Country Health Service Human Research and Ethics Committee (RGS3076). Reciprocal approval has been granted from Curtin University Human Research Ethics Office (HRE2019-0740). Findings will be disseminated publicly through conference presentation and peer-review publications. Interim findings will be released as internal reports to inform the service development.
西澳大利亚(WA)急性远程脑卒中项目于 2016-2017 年在该地区逐步开展。自远程脑卒中项目实施以来,一直在监测服务产出,包括区域内患者获得三级脑卒中专家咨询和再灌注治疗的机会;然而,通过远程医疗(视频会议或电话)咨询脑卒中专家对脑卒中护理的效果和成本效益的影响,以及成本效益的驱动因素尚未系统评估。
本案例研究的目的是使用混合方法评估通过远程医疗咨询脑卒中专家对脑卒中及短暂性脑缺血发作护理的效果和成本效益的影响。将与临床医生和项目管理人员合作构建分类决策树模型。将使用全州行政数据集进行前后比较,以运行基础模型。如果样本量和统计能力允许,将通过脑卒中类型和初始就诊时 CT 扫描的存在、年龄类别和就诊医院对病例和对照组进行匹配。将通过利益相关者访谈探索成本效益的驱动因素。将定性分析的数据与从定量数据集出现的趋势进行交叉引用,并用于指导亚组和敏感性分析中涉及的因素。
该案例研究已获得西澳大利亚乡村卫生局人类研究和伦理委员会(RGS3076)的伦理批准。科廷大学人类研究伦理办公室(HRE2019-0740)已批准互惠。研究结果将通过会议报告和同行评审出版物公开传播。中期结果将作为内部报告发布,为服务发展提供信息。