Suppr超能文献

非铋剂四联疗法、序贯疗法或高剂量埃索美拉唑与阿莫西林双联疗法用于一线根除幽门螺杆菌:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Non-Bismuth Quadruple Therapy, Sequential Therapy or High-Dose Esomeprazole and Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Prospective Randomized Study.

作者信息

Zeriouh Meriem, Elmekkaoui Amine, Bouqfar Mouna, Zazour Abdelkrim, Khannoussi Wafaa, Kharrasse Ghizlane, Abda Naima, Ismaili Zahi

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mohammed VI University Hospital Center/Mohammed First University, Oujda, MAR.

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mohammed VI University Hospital Center, Oujda, MAR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Dec 2;12(12):e11837. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11837.

Abstract

AIM

The study aims were to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of non-bismuth quadruple therapy with sequential therapy and dual therapy with high dose esomeprazole and amoxicillin as an empirical first-line approach to eradicate infection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective randomized trial included 393 patients infected with naïve to eradication therapy, randomized to receive a 10-day non-bismuth quadruple or concomitant (CT) therapy, 10-day sequential therapy (SQ), or 14-day high-dose esomeprazole and amoxicillin (BT). Treatment outcome was assessed by C13-urea breath test at least six weeks after therapy. Adverse events and compliance were assessed with questionnaires and residual medication count.

RESULTS

The baseline demographic clinical and endoscopic characteristics were similar among the three groups. The intention to treat (ITT) analysis was performed in 130, 132, and 131 patients in the BT, SQ, and CT groups, respectively. The eradication rates in ITT were 64.6%, 83.1%, and 92.3%, respectively, in the BT, SQ and CT groups (p = 0.0001). The eradication rates per protocol were 67.7%, 88.5%, and 95.3% (p = 0.0001), respectively, in the BT, SQ, and CT groups. The CT and SQ groups were higher than the BT group (p = 0,0001) but no significant results were seen in the eradication rate between CT and SQ, both in PP analysis and in ITT analysis (p = 0.09). The prevalence of the side effects following the non-bismuth quadruple therapy was 38.2%, significantly higher (p = 0.001) than the BT group (13.80%) and SQ group (22%). There were no significant differences in compliance among the three therapies (p = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

This study found that non-bismuth quadruple therapy yielded a higher eradication rate over sequential regimen as a first-line treatment in Morocco, with no statistical difference between the two protocols studied, while the eradication rate of dual high-dose of esomeprazole and amoxicillin did not exceed 60%. All three therapy schemes showed excellent compliance. However, the prevalence of side events was more important and significantly higher with non-bismuth quadruple therapy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较非铋四联疗法与序贯疗法以及高剂量埃索美拉唑和阿莫西林双重疗法作为根除感染的经验性一线治疗方法的有效性和安全性。

患者与方法

前瞻性随机试验纳入393例初次接受根除治疗的感染者,随机分为接受10天非铋四联或联合疗法(CT)、10天序贯疗法(SQ)或14天高剂量埃索美拉唑和阿莫西林(BT)治疗。治疗结束至少六周后通过C13尿素呼气试验评估治疗效果。通过问卷调查和剩余药物计数评估不良事件和依从性。

结果

三组患者的基线人口统计学、临床和内镜特征相似。BT组、SQ组和CT组分别有130例、132例和131例患者进行了意向性治疗(ITT)分析。BT组、SQ组和CT组的ITT分析根除率分别为64.6%、83.1%和92.3%(p = 0.0001)。BT组、SQ组和CT组的符合方案分析根除率分别为67.7%、88.5%和95.3%(p = 0.0001)。CT组和SQ组高于BT组(p = 0.0001),但在PP分析和ITT分析中,CT组和SQ组之间的根除率无显著差异(p = 0.09)。非铋四联疗法后副作用的发生率为38.2%,显著高于BT组(13.80%)和SQ组(22%)(p = 0.001)。三种疗法的依从性无显著差异(p = 0.16)。

结论

本研究发现,在摩洛哥,作为一线治疗,非铋四联疗法的根除率高于序贯疗法,所研究的两种方案之间无统计学差异,而高剂量埃索美拉唑和阿莫西林双重疗法的根除率未超过60%。所有三种治疗方案均显示出良好的依从性。然而,非铋四联疗法的不良事件发生率更高且显著更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6de1/7781545/0100a2806261/cureus-0012-00000011837-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验