Quantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Mar;32(3):585-594. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05780-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Romosozumab is a novel bone-building drug that reduces fracture risk. This health economic analysis indicates that sequential romosozumab-to-alendronate can be a cost-effective treatment option for postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.
To estimate the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with romosozumab followed by alendronate ("romosozumab-to-alendronate") compared with alendronate alone in patients with severe osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Sweden.
A microsimulation model with a Markov structure was used to simulate fractures, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), for women treated with romosozumab-to-alendronate or alendronate alone. Patients aged 74 years with a recent major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) were followed from the start of treatment until the age of 100 years or death. Treatment with romosozumab for 12 months was followed by alendronate for up to 48 months or alendronate alone with a maximum treatment duration of 60 months. The analysis had a societal perspective. Efficacy of romosozumab and alendronate were derived from phase III randomized controlled trials. Resource use and unit costs were collected from the literature. Cost-effectiveness was estimated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with QALYs as effectiveness measures.
The base case analysis showed that sequential romosozumab-to-alendronate treatment was associated with 0.089 additional QALYs at an additional cost of €3002 compared to alendronate alone, resulting in an ICER of €33,732. At a Swedish reference willingness-to-pay per QALY of €60,000, romosozumab-to-alendronate had a 97.9% probability of being cost-effective against alendronate alone. The results were most sensitive to time horizon, persistence assumptions, patient age, and treatment efficacy.
The results of this study indicate that sequential romosozumab-to-alendronate can be a cost-effective treatment option for postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.
罗莫佐单抗是一种新型的骨骼生成药物,可降低骨折风险。这项健康经济学分析表明,对于有高骨折风险的绝经后严重骨质疏松症患者,序贯使用罗莫佐单抗-阿仑膦酸钠(“罗莫佐单抗-阿仑膦酸钠”)可能是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。
评估在瑞典,对于有高骨折风险的严重骨质疏松症患者,与单独使用阿仑膦酸钠相比,序贯使用罗莫佐单抗-阿仑膦酸钠(“罗莫佐单抗-阿仑膦酸钠”)治疗的成本效益。
使用具有马尔可夫结构的微模拟模型,模拟接受罗莫佐单抗-阿仑膦酸钠或单独使用阿仑膦酸钠治疗的患者的骨折、成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。年龄为 74 岁、近期发生主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)的患者从治疗开始到 100 岁或死亡时进行随访。接受罗莫佐单抗治疗 12 个月后,再接受阿仑膦酸钠治疗,最长 48 个月,或单独使用阿仑膦酸钠,最长 60 个月。该分析采用了一种社会视角。罗莫佐单抗和阿仑膦酸钠的疗效来自 III 期随机对照试验。资源使用和单位成本从文献中收集。使用增量成本效益比(ICER)和 QALYs 作为有效性指标来估计成本效益。
基础情况分析显示,与单独使用阿仑膦酸钠相比,序贯罗莫佐单抗-阿仑膦酸钠治疗可额外增加 0.089 个 QALY,额外成本为 3002 欧元,导致 ICER 为 33732 欧元。在瑞典参考意愿支付每 QALY 为 60000 欧元的情况下,罗莫佐单抗-阿仑膦酸钠治疗对单独使用阿仑膦酸钠的成本效益概率为 97.9%。结果对时间范围、持续时间假设、患者年龄和治疗效果最为敏感。
本研究结果表明,对于有高骨折风险的绝经后严重骨质疏松症患者,序贯使用罗莫佐单抗-阿仑膦酸钠可能是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。