Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
Veterinary and Food Institute, Botanická 15, 842 52, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Parasitol Res. 2021 Feb;120(2):547-552. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06995-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
The known data resulting from individual surveys of canine dirofilariosis point to the great differences in the epidemiological situation among countries where Dirofilaria parasites emerged approximately at the same time. In this regard, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, neighboring countries situated in Central Europe, could serve as an illustrative example of such a situation. The present study aimed to assess the prevalence of canine dirofilariosis in both countries and to discuss the reasons for potential differences shown. Between October and December 2019, 429 dogs from the Czech Republic and 644 from Slovakia were examined for canine dirofilariosis using the Knott test for microfilariae detection and conventional PCR for the species determination. The results' analyses showed notable differences. While in the Czech Republic autochthonous Dirofilaria repens cases are reported sporadically and Dirofilaria immitis infections have been confirmed only as imported so far, in Slovakia, both Dirofilaria species seem to have become endemic. Concretely, in the Czech Republic, microfilariae were detected in the peripheral blood of 8 dogs (1.86%): in seven, D. repens was confirmed, and in one dog, mixed infection with D. repens and D. immitis was diagnosed. Seven infected animals came from the eastern part of the country neighboring Slovakia. In Slovakia, microfilariae were detected in 68 (10.56%) dogs examined. DNA analysis confirmed D. repens mono-infection in 38 (5.90%) dogs, single D. immitis infection in 21 (3.26%) animals, and both Dirofilaria species were detected in 9 (1.40%) samples. Although we are unable to determine the cause of the differences, our study confirmed that the long-registered low number of canine dirofilariosis cases in the Czech Republic is not due to insufficient investigation (monitoring), but due to a low prevalence of the parasite in this area.
从对犬心丝虫病的个别调查中获得的已知数据表明,在寄生虫大约同时出现的国家中,流行病学情况存在巨大差异。在这方面,捷克共和国和斯洛伐克这两个位于中欧的邻国可以作为这种情况的一个说明性例子。本研究旨在评估这两个国家的犬心丝虫病的流行率,并讨论显示出的潜在差异的原因。2019 年 10 月至 12 月期间,使用 Knott 微丝蚴检测试验和常规 PCR 对来自捷克共和国的 429 只狗和来自斯洛伐克的 644 只狗进行了犬心丝虫病检测。结果分析显示出显著差异。虽然在捷克共和国,零星报告了本地的犬心丝虫病病例,并且到目前为止,仅确认了进口的犬心丝虫感染,但在斯洛伐克,两种犬心丝虫病似乎都已成为地方性疾病。具体来说,在捷克共和国,8 只狗(1.86%)的外周血中检测到微丝蚴:其中 7 只被确认为犬心丝虫,1 只狗被诊断为犬心丝虫和犬心丝虫混合感染。7 只受感染的动物来自与斯洛伐克接壤的该国东部地区。在斯洛伐克,68 只(10.56%)检查的狗中检测到微丝蚴。DNA 分析证实 38 只(5.90%)狗为犬心丝虫单感染,21 只(3.26%)动物为犬心丝虫单感染,9 只(1.40%)样本中同时检测到两种犬心丝虫。尽管我们无法确定差异的原因,但我们的研究证实,捷克共和国长期以来记录的犬心丝虫病病例数量较少并非由于调查(监测)不足,而是由于该地区寄生虫的流行率较低。