• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过一种新的定量方法评估睑板腺可视性。

Meibomian glands visibility assessment through a new quantitative method.

机构信息

Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Dr Moliner, 50 - 46100, Burjassot, Spain.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 May;259(5):1323-1331. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-05034-7. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-020-05034-7
PMID:33409681
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to develop a new objective semiautomatic method for analysing Meibomian glands visibility quantitatively.

METHODS

One hundred twelve healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 90 years (48.29 ± 27.46 years) participated in this study. Infrared meibography was obtained from the right upper eyelid through Oculus Keratograph 5 M. Meibographies were classified into 3 groups: Group 1 = patients with good subjective glands visibility and a gland dropout percentage < 1/3 of the total Meibomian gland area; Group 2 = patients with low subjective glands visibility and a gland dropout < 1/3; and Group 3 = patients with low subjective glands visibility and a gland dropout > 1/3. New metrics based on the visibility of the Meibomian glands were calculated and later compared between groups. Rho Spearman test was used to assess the correlation between each metric, and Meibomian gland dropout percentage with the entire sample and after excluding Group 2. A p value less than 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Fifty-six subjects were classified in Group 1 (24.48 ± 9.62 years), 19 in Group 2 (69.16 ± 21.30 years) and 37 in Group 3 (73.59 ± 13.70 years). No statistically significant differences were found between Groups 1 and 2 in dropout percentage. All metrics, with the exception of entropy, showed a higher Meibomian gland visibility in Group 1 than in the other two groups. Moderate correlations were statistically significant for all metrics with the exception of entropy. Correlations were higher after excluding Group 2.

CONCLUSION

The proposed method is able to assess Meibomian gland visibility in an objective and repeatable way, which might help clinicians enhance Meibomian gland dysfunction diagnosis and follow-up treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种新的客观半自动方法,用于定量分析睑板腺的可视性。

方法

本研究纳入 112 名年龄在 18 至 90 岁之间(48.29±27.46 岁)的健康志愿者。使用 Oculus Keratograph 5M 对右侧上眼睑进行红外睑板腺照相。将睑板腺照相分为 3 组:组 1=患者主观上睑板腺可视性良好,且睑板腺缺失率<总睑板腺面积的 1/3;组 2=患者主观上睑板腺可视性较差,且睑板腺缺失率<1/3;组 3=患者主观上睑板腺可视性较差,且睑板腺缺失率>1/3。基于睑板腺可视性计算新的度量标准,并在组间进行比较。采用 Rho Spearman 检验评估各度量标准与全样本以及排除组 2 后与全样本之间的相关性。p 值<0.05 定义为统计学显著。

结果

56 例患者归入组 1(24.48±9.62 岁),19 例归入组 2(69.16±21.30 岁),37 例归入组 3(73.59±13.70 岁)。组 1 和组 2 的缺失率无统计学差异。除了熵之外,所有度量标准在组 1 中均显示出较高的睑板腺可视性。除了熵之外,所有度量标准的相关性均具有统计学意义。排除组 2 后相关性更高。

结论

所提出的方法能够客观、重复地评估睑板腺的可视性,这可能有助于临床医生增强对睑板腺功能障碍的诊断和随访治疗。

相似文献

1
Meibomian glands visibility assessment through a new quantitative method.通过一种新的定量方法评估睑板腺可视性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 May;259(5):1323-1331. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-05034-7. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Assessment of meibomian gland drop-out and visibility through a new quantitative method in scleral lens wearers: A one-year follow-up study.通过一种新的定量方法评估巩膜镜片佩戴者的睑板腺缺失和可见度:一项为期一年的随访研究。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Feb;46(1):101571. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.101571. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
3
Diagnostic Capability of a New Objective Method to Assess Meibomian Gland Visibility.一种评估睑板腺可视性的新客观方法的诊断能力。
Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Sep 1;98(9):1045-1055. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001764.
4
Meibomian gland dropout in patients with dry eye disease in China.中国干眼症患者的睑板腺缺失情况。
Curr Eye Res. 2014 Oct;39(10):965-72. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.891748. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
5
Dry eye and Meibomian gland dysfunction with meibography in patients with lamellar ichthyosis.干燥性眼和睑板腺功能障碍,联合睑板腺照相术在板层状鱼鳞病患者中的表现。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Apr;41(2):154-156. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Manifestation of meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with Sjögren's syndrome, non-Sjögren's dry eye, and non-dry eye controls.干燥综合征、非干燥综合征干眼及非干眼对照患者睑板腺功能障碍的表现
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;38(3):1161-1167. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0577-4. Epub 2017 May 31.
7
Dry Eye and Quantitative and Qualitative Changes of Meibomian Glands in Patients With Pemphigus.干燥眼与天疱疮患者的睑板腺的定量和定性变化。
Cornea. 2020 Sep;39(9):1108-1111. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002356.
8
Relationship between meibomian gland loss in infrared meibography and meibum quality in dry eye patients.红外睑板腺成像中睑板腺缺失与干眼症患者的睑脂质量的关系。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 4;22(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02509-5.
9
Evaluation of dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction with meibography in patients with rosacea.酒渣鼻患者干眼和睑板腺功能障碍的睑板腺造影评估
Cornea. 2015 May;34(5):497-9. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000393.
10
Examination of Gland Dropout Detected on Infrared Meibography by Using Optical Coherence Tomography Meibography.应用光学相干断层扫描眼表仪检查红外照相仪检测到的睑板腺缺失。
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jan;15(1):130-138.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A modular and adaptable approach for automated morphological feature extraction in meibography images.一种用于睑板腺图像自动形态特征提取的模块化且可适应的方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22503. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06561-1.
2
Effect of Heating and Massaging of Meibomian Glands on Their Imaging.睑板腺加热及按摩对其成像的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 29;60(10):1603. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101603.
3
A Deep Learning Approach for Meibomian Gland Appearance Evaluation.一种用于睑板腺外观评估的深度学习方法。

本文引用的文献

1
Meibomian Gland Morphology: The Influence of Structural Variations on Gland Function and Ocular Surface Parameters.睑板腺形态:结构变异对腺体功能和眼表参数的影响。
Cornea. 2019 Dec;38(12):1506-1512. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002141.
2
The influence of meibomian gland loss on ocular surface clinical parameters.睑板腺缺失对眼表临床参数的影响。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Oct;42(5):562-568. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
3
Repeatability assessment of biometric measurements with different refractive states and age using a swept-source biometer.
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 May 22;3(4):100334. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100334. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Exploring the Cutting Edge of Vision Science: New Developments in Diagnostics and Treatment of Ocular Surface in Dry Eye Disease.探索视觉科学前沿:干眼疾病眼表诊断与治疗的新进展
Life (Basel). 2023 Jul 19;13(7):1584. doi: 10.3390/life13071584.
5
Development of Artefact-Free Imaging System for Accurate Meibomian Gland Reflectivity Assessment.开发无伪影成像系统以准确评估睑板腺反射率。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Feb 1;12(2):9. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.2.9.
6
The Effects of Soft Contact Lens Wear on The Tear Film and Meibomian Gland Drop-Out and Visibility.软性隐形眼镜佩戴对泪膜、睑板腺缺失及可视性的影响
Life (Basel). 2022 Aug 2;12(8):1177. doi: 10.3390/life12081177.
7
Automation of dry eye disease quantitative assessment: A review.干眼疾病定量评估的自动化:综述。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;50(6):653-666. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14119. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
8
How Can We Best Measure the Performance of Scleral Lenses? Current Insights.我们如何才能最好地衡量巩膜镜的性能?当前见解。
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2022 Apr 7;14:47-65. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S284632. eCollection 2022.
应用扫频源生物测量仪评估不同屈光状态和年龄的生物测量重复性。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Jan;16(1):63-69. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1557517. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
An Eyelid Warming Device for the Management of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.一种用于治疗睑板腺功能障碍的眼睑加热装置。
J Optom. 2019 Apr-Jun;12(2):120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
New insights into the morphology and function of meibomian glands.睑板腺形态与功能的新见解。
Exp Eye Res. 2017 Oct;163:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.06.010.
6
TFOS DEWS II Diagnostic Methodology report.TFOS DEWS II 诊断方法学报告。
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):539-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
7
TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report.TFOS DEWS II 病理生理学报告。
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):438-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report.TFOS DEWS II 定义与分类报告。
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
9
Emerging strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction: Proceedings of the OCEAN group meeting.新兴的睑板腺功能障碍诊断和治疗策略:OCEAN 小组会议记录。
Ocul Surf. 2017 Apr;15(2):179-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
10
A quantitative method for assessing the quality of meibomian glands.一种评估睑板腺质量的定量方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2016 Aug 1;75:130-8. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 2.