Institut de Recherche Expérimentale & Clinique (IREC) - Radiology Department, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) - Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4514-4527. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07522-0. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Multicenter oncology trials increasingly include MRI examinations with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification for lesion characterization and follow-up. However, the repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) limits above which a true change in ADC can be considered relevant are poorly defined. This study assessed these limits in a standardized whole-body (WB)-MRI protocol.
A prospective, multicenter study was performed at three centers equipped with the same 3.0-T scanners to test a WB-MRI protocol including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Eight healthy volunteers per center were enrolled to undergo test and retest examinations in the same center and a third examination in another center. ADC variability was assessed in multiple organs by two readers using two-way mixed ANOVA, Bland-Altman plots, coefficient of variation (CoV), and the upper limit of the 95% CI on repeatability (RC) and reproducibility (RDC) coefficients.
CoV of ADC was not influenced by other factors (center, reader) than the organ. Based on the upper limit of the 95% CI on RC and RDC (from both readers), a change in ADC in an individual patient must be superior to 12% (cerebrum white matter), 16% (paraspinal muscle), 22% (renal cortex), 26% (central and peripheral zones of the prostate), 29% (renal medulla), 35% (liver), 45% (spleen), 50% (posterior iliac crest), 66% (L5 vertebra), 68% (femur), and 94% (acetabulum) to be significant.
This study proposes R&R limits above which ADC changes can be considered as a reliable quantitative endpoint to assess disease or treatment-related changes in the tissue microstructure in the setting of multicenter WB-MRI trials.
• The present study showed the range of R&R of ADC in WB-MRI that may be achieved in a multicenter framework when a standardized protocol is deployed. • R&R was not influenced by the site of acquisition of DW images. • Clinically significant changes in ADC measured in a multicenter WB-MRI protocol performed with the same type of MRI scanner must be superior to 12% (cerebrum white matter), 16% (paraspinal muscle), 22% (renal cortex), 26% (central zone and peripheral zone of prostate), 29% (renal medulla), 35% (liver), 45% (spleen), 50% (posterior iliac crest), 66% (L5 vertebra), 68% (femur), and 94% (acetabulum) to be detected with a 95% confidence level.
越来越多的多中心肿瘤学试验包括磁共振成像(MRI)检查,以进行病变特征和随访的表观扩散系数(ADC)量化。然而,ADC 真正变化的可重复性和再现性(R&R)界限定义较差。本研究在标准化全身(WB)-MRI 方案中评估了这些界限。
在配备相同 3.0-T 扫描仪的三个中心进行了一项前瞻性、多中心研究,以测试包括扩散加权成像(DWI)的 WB-MRI 方案。每个中心招募 8 名健康志愿者,在同一中心进行测试和复测检查,并在另一个中心进行第三次检查。两名读者使用双向混合方差分析、Bland-Altman 图、变异系数(CoV)以及重复性(RC)和再现性(RDC)系数的 95%置信区间上限,评估多个器官的 ADC 变异性。
ADC 的 CoV 不受其他因素(中心、读者)的影响,仅受器官的影响。基于 RC 和 RDC 的 95%置信区间上限(来自两位读者),个体患者的 ADC 变化必须超过 12%(大脑白质)、16%(脊柱旁肌肉)、22%(肾皮质)、26%(前列腺中央和外周区)、29%(肾髓质)、35%(肝脏)、45%(脾脏)、50%(髂后嵴)、66%(L5 椎体)、68%(股骨)和 94%(髋臼),才能被认为是显著的。
本研究提出了 R&R 界限,超过该界限,ADC 变化可被视为评估多中心 WB-MRI 试验中组织微观结构疾病或治疗相关变化的可靠定量终点。
本研究显示了在使用标准化方案进行多中心研究时,在 WB-MRI 中可实现的 ADC 的 R&R 范围。
R&R 不受 DW 图像采集部位的影响。
在使用相同类型 MRI 扫描仪进行的多中心 WB-MRI 方案中,ADC 的临床显著变化必须超过 12%(大脑白质)、16%(脊柱旁肌肉)、22%(肾皮质)、26%(前列腺中央和外周区)、29%(肾髓质)、35%(肝脏)、45%(脾脏)、50%(髂后嵴)、66%(L5 椎体)、68%(股骨)和 94%(髋臼),才能以 95%置信水平检测到。