Worldwide Safety and Regulatory, Pfizer Inc., 235 E 42nd St, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;77(7):1019-1028. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03039-z. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
Acetaminophen (APAP) is available over-the-counter and widely regarded as safe for use in pregnancy. APAP has been used to close a persistently patent ductus arteriosus. Fetal constriction/closure of the ductus arteriosus (FCCDA), of public health interest given the drug's widespread use during pregnancy, is being monitored globally, including by the European Medicines Agency Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee. Our objective was to share a comprehensive signal evaluation of FCCDA with in utero APAP exposure to determine if the totality of evidence is sufficiently more consistent with one of the following two possibilities: (1) APAP never contributes to FCCDA (null hypothesis or H) versus (2) APAP may in some cases be at least a contributory cause of in utero DA narrowing (alternative hypothesis or H) to justify risk communication.
To assess the relative support for H versus H, we synthesize and interpret within an Austin Bradford Hill criteria framework a comprehensive, cross-disciplinary set of published information and de novo analysis, including toxicology, epidemiology, clinical pharmacology, and clinical and quantitative pharmacovigilance analysis of spontaneous reports.
While residual uncertainty remains, the totality of information is more compatible with H than H, to the extent that it is reasonably possible that APAP may sometimes be at least a contributory cause of FCCDA.
It is reasonably possible that APAP may sometimes be at least a contributory cause of FCCDA, and this should therefore be communicated to stakeholders.
CLINICALTRIALS.
NOT APPLICABLE.
对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)可在柜台上买到,并且被广泛认为在怀孕期间使用是安全的。APAP 已被用于关闭持续开放的动脉导管未闭。由于该药在怀孕期间广泛使用,胎儿动脉导管收缩/关闭(FCCDA)引起了公众健康关注,目前正在全球范围内进行监测,包括欧洲药品管理局药物警戒风险评估委员会。我们的目的是分享与宫内 APAP 暴露相关的 FCCDA 全面信号评估,以确定证据的总体是否更符合以下两种可能性之一:(1)APAP 从不导致 FCCDA(零假设或 H)与(2)APAP 在某些情况下可能至少是胎儿 DA 变窄的促成原因(替代假设或 H),以证明风险沟通是合理的。
为了评估 H 与 H 相对支持的程度,我们在奥斯汀·布拉德福德·希尔标准框架内综合和解释了一套全面的、跨学科的已发表信息和新分析,包括毒理学、流行病学、临床药理学以及自发性报告的临床和定量药物警戒分析。
虽然仍然存在剩余的不确定性,但总的信息更符合 H 而不是 H,以至于合理地认为 APAP 有时可能至少是 FCCDA 的促成原因之一。
合理地认为 APAP 有时可能至少是 FCCDA 的促成原因之一,因此应该向利益相关者传达这一信息。
CLINICALTRIALS.GOV 登记:不适用。