Suppr超能文献

妊娠纹白纹期治疗的对比研究:1565nm 非剥脱性点阵激光与微针点阵射频。

Comparative study of treatment for striae alba stage striae gravidarum: 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser versus fractional microneedle radiofrequency.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing, 100073, People's Republic of China.

Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Dec;36(9):1823-1830. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-03203-y. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

Abstract

Striae gravidarum is a common dermatologic condition for females caused by multiple factors during pregnancy. It remains a therapeutic challenge especially in the striae alba (SA) stage, generating psychological and emotional distress to those affected. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) and fractional microneedle radiofrequency (MRF) for treatment of SA striae gravidarum. Fourteen Chinese women with SA striae gravidarum were included in this study. Patient abdomens were randomly divided into NAFL and MRF treatment sides, treated three times at 6-week intervals. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by subjective (clinical assessments, patient satisfaction rating, adverse effects assessment) assessments and objective (skin melanin index measurement, histological study) assessments. Clinical assessment suggested MRF was more effective (P = 0.0143) for improving the appearance of SA striae gravidarum. Both NAFL and MRF demonstrated effective improvement (P = 0.0082 and P = 0.0158, respectively), with no significant difference according to patient satisfaction ratings and changes in melanin index (P = 0.5900). Both treatments induced limited adverse reactions, but MRF treatment caused significant pain compared with the more moderate NAFL treatment (P = 0.0003). MRF treatment increased neocollagen and elastic fibers more significantly than NAFL, based on histological assessments (P = 0.0298 and P = 0.0048, respectively). MRF treatment improved collagen regeneration in SA striae gravidarum more than NAFL but caused considerable pain during treatment. Corresponding treatment or therapeutic strategies should be applied according to clinical scenario.

摘要

妊娠纹是一种常见的女性皮肤疾病,由多种因素引起。尤其是在妊娠纹的白色阶段(SA),其治疗极具挑战性,会给患者带来心理和情绪上的困扰。本研究旨在比较 1565nm 非剥脱性点阵激光(NAFL)和微针点阵射频(MRF)治疗 SA 妊娠纹的疗效和安全性。本研究纳入了 14 名患有 SA 妊娠纹的中国女性。患者的腹部被随机分为 NAFL 和 MRF 治疗侧,每 6 周治疗 3 次。通过主观评估(临床评估、患者满意度评分、不良反应评估)和客观评估(皮肤黑素指数测量、组织学研究)评估治疗效果。临床评估表明,MRF 治疗更有效(P = 0.0143),能改善 SA 妊娠纹的外观。NAFL 和 MRF 均能有效改善(P = 0.0082 和 P = 0.0158),但患者满意度评分和黑素指数变化无显著差异(P = 0.5900)。两种治疗方法均引起了有限的不良反应,但与较为温和的 NAFL 治疗相比,MRF 治疗引起了更明显的疼痛(P = 0.0003)。组织学评估显示,MRF 治疗较 NAFL 治疗更显著地增加了新胶原和弹性纤维(P = 0.0298 和 P = 0.0048)。MRF 治疗能更有效地促进 SA 妊娠纹的胶原再生,但在治疗过程中会引起明显的疼痛。应根据临床情况选择相应的治疗或治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验