Laser Aesthetic Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Aug;48(15):2915-2926. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03954-x. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
INTRODUCTION: Striae distensae (SD), linear scars of derma, caused by disproportionate skin stretching, which indicates a cosmetic problem and even endangers individuals' psychosocial health. Microneedling, representing a relatively new procedural therapy, has shown brightening but diverse results in the remedy of SD. Our study systematically investigates and further evaluates the efficacy of microneedling for SD. METHOD: This study was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. According to the preplanned search strategy, four electronic databases were comprehensively searched for eligible clinical controlled studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for continuous data and dichotomous data, respectively. RESULTS: According to the predetermined criteria, eleven eligible articles of six RCTs and five non-RCTs were included. Concerning clinical improvement, a significant difference was observed in the microneedle radiofrequency treatment subgroup (SMD: 0.57, 95% CI 0.20-0.94, P = 0.003). The pooled result of the second subgroup revealed that microneedling and lasers producing almost comparable effectiveness for treating SD with no significant difference (P = 0.35). The analysis result of the third subgroup of microneedling versus non-laser therapy indicated significant difference at the 5% significance level (SMD:1.01, 95% CI 0.51-1.51, P < 0.0001). With regard to patient satisfaction, the pooled estimate concluded that participants' satisfaction with therapeutic effect between MRF and laser group was comparable (P = 0.26), whereas microneedling exhibited significant superiority than both laser (P = 0.04) and non-laser treatments (SMD: 0.95, 95% CI 0.52-1.38, P < 0.0001). Occurrence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) was not obvious in microneedling therapy compared to other treatments, and a statistically difference was observed (P = 0.0003). Microneedling treatment caused significant pain compared with laser therapy (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis has provided initial evidence of the efficacy and safety of microneedling technology for SD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
简介:妊娠纹(SD)是一种线性皮肤疤痕,是由于皮肤过度伸展引起的,这不仅是一个美容问题,甚至会危害个人的心理健康。微针疗法作为一种相对较新的治疗方法,在治疗 SD 方面显示出了不同的效果。我们的研究系统地调查和进一步评估了微针治疗 SD 的疗效。 方法:本研究遵循 PRISMA 指南进行。根据预先计划的搜索策略,全面检索了四个电子数据库以寻找合格的临床对照研究。分别计算了连续数据和二分类数据的标准化均数差(SMD)和比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间。 结果:根据预定标准,纳入了六项 RCT 和五项非 RCT 的 11 篇合格文章。关于临床改善,微针射频治疗亚组的差异具有统计学意义(SMD:0.57,95%CI 0.20-0.94,P=0.003)。第二个亚组的汇总结果表明,微针和激光治疗 SD 的效果几乎相当,无显著差异(P=0.35)。微针与非激光治疗的第三个亚组分析结果表明,在 5%的显著性水平上差异有统计学意义(SMD:1.01,95%CI 0.51-1.51,P<0.0001)。关于患者满意度,汇总估计结果表明,微针治疗组和激光治疗组的治疗效果满意度相当(P=0.26),而微针治疗与激光(P=0.04)和非激光治疗(SMD:0.95,95%CI 0.52-1.38,P<0.0001)相比具有显著优势。与其他治疗方法相比,微针治疗后炎症后色素沉着(PIH)并不明显,差异有统计学意义(P=0.0003)。与激光治疗相比,微针治疗引起的疼痛明显(P<0.00001)。 结论:本系统评价和荟萃分析初步证实了微针技术治疗 SD 的疗效和安全性。 证据水平 II:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-8
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-4-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-23
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023-2-1
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022-9-30
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2022-10
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021-7-1
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021-11
Dermatol Surg. 2021-6-1
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020-12-22