Suppr超能文献

数字乳腺断层合成摄影术:对有症状年轻女性癌症的敏感性。

Digital breast tomosynthesis: sensitivity for cancer in younger symptomatic women.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Mailbox 4, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK.

NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2021 Mar 1;94(1119):20201105. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201105. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) has limited sensitivity for cancer in younger women with denser breasts. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) can reduce the risk of cancer being obscured by overlying tissue. The primary study aim was to compare the sensitivity of FFDM, DBT and FFDM-plus-DBT in women under 60 years old with clinical suspicion of breast cancer.

METHODS

This multicentre study recruited 446 patients from UK breast clinics. Participants underwent both standard FFDM and DBT. A blinded retrospective multireader study involving 12 readers and 300 mammograms (152 malignant and 148 benign cases) was conducted.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for cancer was 86.6% with FFDM [95% CI (85.2-88.0%)], 89.1% with DBT [95% CI (88.2-90%)], and 91.7% with FFDM+DBT [95% CI (90.7-92.6%)]. In the densest breasts, the maximum sensitivity increment with FFDM +DBT over FFDM alone was 10.3%, varying by density measurement method. Overall specificity was 81.4% with FFDM [95% CI (80.5-82.3%)], 84.6% with DBT [95% CI (83.9-85.3%)], and 79.6% with FFDM +DBT [95% CI (79.0-80.2%)]. No differences were detected in accuracy of tumour measurement in unifocal cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Where available, DBT merits first-line use in the under 60 age group in symptomatic breast clinics, particularly in women known to have very dense breasts.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study is one of very few to address the accuracy of DBT in symptomatic rather than screening patients. It quantifies the diagnostic gains of DBT in direct comparison with standard digital mammography, supporting informed decisions on appropriate use of DBT in this population.

摘要

目的

全数字化乳腺摄影术(FFDM)对致密乳腺的年轻女性的癌症敏感性有限。数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)可以降低因重叠组织而使癌症被掩盖的风险。主要研究目的是比较 FFDM、DBT 和 FFDM 加 DBT 在有乳腺癌临床疑似症状的 60 岁以下女性中的敏感性。

方法

这项多中心研究从英国乳腺诊所招募了 446 名患者。参与者均接受标准 FFDM 和 DBT 检查。进行了一项由 12 名读者和 300 张乳腺 X 线照片(152 例恶性和 148 例良性病例)组成的盲法回顾性多读者研究。

结果

FFDM 的癌症检出率为 86.6%(95%CI:85.2-88.0%),DBT 为 89.1%(95%CI:88.2-90%),FFDM+DBT 为 91.7%(95%CI:90.7-92.6%)。在最致密的乳房中,FFDM+DBT 比单独使用 FFDM 的最大敏感性增加了 10.3%,这取决于密度测量方法。FFDM 的总体特异性为 81.4%(95%CI:80.5-82.3%),DBT 为 84.6%(95%CI:83.9-85.3%),FFDM+DBT 为 79.6%(95%CI:79.0-80.2%)。在单发病灶病例中,肿瘤测量的准确性没有差异。

结论

在有条件的情况下,DBT 应作为有症状的乳腺诊所中 60 岁以下年龄组的一线检查方法,特别是在已知乳腺非常致密的女性中。

知识进展

本研究是为数不多的专门研究 DBT 在有症状而非筛查患者中的准确性的研究之一。它通过与标准数字乳腺摄影术直接比较,量化了 DBT 的诊断增益,为在该人群中使用 DBT 提供了知情决策。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.数字乳腺断层合成技术的进展
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb;208(2):256-266. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17127. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验