From the Leeds/Wakefield Breast Screening Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Seacroft Hospital, York Road, Leeds LS14 6UH, England (N.S., M.M., I.H., B.J.G.D.); and Applied Vision Research Centre, Loughborough University, Loughborough, England (Y.C.).
Radiology. 2019 May;291(2):310-317. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019180809. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Background Multiple studies showed digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has a higher cancer detection rate and a lower recall rate than full-field digital mammography (FFDM). However, there is a paucity of studies on whether the benign biopsy rate will be lower with DBT. Purpose To evaluate the benign biopsy rate of DBT versus that of FFDM in women recalled after breast screening within the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. Materials and Methods This prospective single institution study included women who underwent screening FFDM or screening breast MRI between November 13, 2015, and July 29, 2016, and were recalled. Women who were recalled underwent a breast examination, additional imaging (mammography, US), and biopsy, if required. The number of interventions and the outcome of assessment were recorded. FFDM was performed at the screening appointment, and DBT images were acquired when participants attended a screening assessment within 3 weeks after screening FFDM. Two of four readers blinded to biopsy results analyzed DBT images in isolation and then in conjunction with FFDM images and any additional two-dimensional mammographic or US images. Two-tailed McNemar tests were used to test differences in sensitivity and specificity of the two conditions at 5% significance level. Results During the study period, 30 933 women underwent FFDM. A total of 1470 women were recalled (recall rate, 4.8%), and 827 were included after exclusion criteria were applied. Their mean age was 56.7 years ± 7.7 (standard deviation). A total of 145 breast cancers were detected (142 with FFDM, two with DBT only, one with surveillance MRI). Triple assessment without DBT resulted in 571 breast biopsies and enabled detection of 142 cancers. The addition of DBT would have resulted in 298 biopsies and detection of 142 cancers, reducing the number of biopsies from 571 of 827 (69.0%) to 298 of 827 (36.0%). Conclusion When compared with full-field digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis can reduce the benign biopsy rate while maintaining the cancer detection rate. © RSNA, 2019 See also the editorial by Skaane in this issue.
背景 多项研究表明,与全数字化乳腺摄影术(FFDM)相比,数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)具有更高的癌症检出率和更低的召回率。然而,关于 DBT 是否会降低良性活检率的研究甚少。 目的 在英国国家卫生服务部乳腺筛查计划中,评估乳腺筛查后召回的女性中 DBT 与 FFDM 的良性活检率。 材料与方法 这项前瞻性单机构研究纳入了 2015 年 11 月 13 日至 2016 年 7 月 29 日期间接受乳腺筛查 FFDM 或乳腺筛查 MRI 的女性,并对其进行了召回。召回的女性接受了乳腺检查、额外的影像学检查(乳房 X 线摄影术、超声),并在需要时进行活检。记录干预措施的数量和评估结果。FFDM 在筛查时进行,当参与者在接受 FFDM 筛查后 3 周内接受筛查评估时,采集 DBT 图像。4 位读者中有两位对活检结果不知情,他们分别单独分析 DBT 图像,然后结合 FFDM 图像和任何二维乳房 X 线摄影术或超声图像进行分析。采用双侧 McNemar 检验,以 5%的显著性水平检验两种情况下的敏感性和特异性差异。 结果 在研究期间,共有 30933 名女性接受了 FFDM。共有 1470 名女性被召回(召回率为 4.8%),排除标准适用后,共有 827 名女性纳入研究。她们的平均年龄为 56.7 岁±7.7(标准差)。共检出 145 例乳腺癌(FFDM 检出 142 例,DBT 仅检出 2 例,监测 MRI 检出 1 例)。不进行 DBT 的三联评估导致 571 例乳腺活检,并检出 142 例癌症。增加 DBT 将导致 298 例活检和 142 例癌症的检出,使 827 例中的活检次数从 571 例(69.0%)减少到 298 例(36.0%)。 结论 与全数字化乳腺摄影术相比,数字乳腺断层合成术在保持癌症检出率的同时,可降低良性活检率。