• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基线手术部位感染发生率较低的环境中,评估接受剖宫产术的女性中阿奇霉素辅助预防的效果。

Evaluation of Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery in a Setting With Low Baseline Incidence of Surgical Site Infection.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Sep;43(9):1062-1068.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2020.12.016
PMID:33412302
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this quality improvement study was to determine the effect of adding azithromycin to standard antibiotic prophylaxis on the rates surgical site infection (SSI) in women undergoing both elective and non-elective cesarean deliveries at our centre.

METHODS

A before-and-after quality improvement study was conducted at the Regina General Hospital in Regina, Saskatchewan. Data collected from 989 women who had a caesarean delivery between June 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017 were compared with those from 1033 women who had a caesarean delivery between August 1, 2017 and July 31, 2018, after the introduction of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the change in the incidence of SSI up to 30 days following surgery. Secondary outcome measures included timing of azithromycin prophylaxis and the number of women who did not receive azithromycin.

RESULTS

Surgical site infection rates decreased from 3.5% to 2.9% after adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis was introduced. The absolute reduction in SSIs of 0.6% was not statistically significant (P = 0.42). There were no differences in SSI rates between the elective and non-elective subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Adding azithromycin to the standard antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery showed no statistically significant reduction in SSI rates in a population with low baseline rates of SSI.

摘要

目的

本质量改进研究旨在确定在我们中心行择期和非择期剖宫产的女性中,在标准抗生素预防方案中添加阿奇霉素对手术部位感染(SSI)发生率的影响。

方法

在萨斯喀彻温省里贾纳的里贾纳综合医院进行了一项前后对照的质量改进研究。比较了 2016 年 6 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日期间 989 例剖宫产患者的数据,与 2017 年 8 月 1 日至 2018 年 7 月 31 日期间接受辅助阿奇霉素预防后 1033 例剖宫产患者的数据。主要结局指标为术后 30 天内 SSI 的发生率变化。次要结局指标包括阿奇霉素预防的时机和未接受阿奇霉素的女性人数。

结果

在辅助阿奇霉素预防后,SSI 发生率从 3.5%降至 2.9%。SSI 绝对减少 0.6%,无统计学意义(P=0.42)。择期和非择期亚组的 SSI 发生率无差异。

结论

在 SSI 发生率基线较低的人群中,在标准抗生素预防方案中添加阿奇霉素并未显著降低剖宫产的 SSI 发生率。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery in a Setting With Low Baseline Incidence of Surgical Site Infection.在基线手术部位感染发生率较低的环境中,评估接受剖宫产术的女性中阿奇霉素辅助预防的效果。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Sep;43(9):1062-1068.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Clinical effectiveness of adding azithromycin to antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery.剖宫产术预防性应用抗菌药物中添加阿奇霉素的临床效果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):335.e1-335.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 May 27.
3
Economic Evaluation of Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery.剖宫产术中阿奇霉素辅助预防性应用的经济学评价
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):328-334. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002129.
4
Impact of Azithromycin-Based Extended-Spectrum Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Noninfectious Cesarean Wound Complications.阿奇霉素为基础的广谱抗生素预防方案对非感染性剖宫产切口并发症的影响。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jul;36(9):886-890. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1679914. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
5
Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery.剖宫产术中阿奇霉素辅助预防性用药
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 29;375(13):1231-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602044.
6
Prospective cohort study of surgical site infections following single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India.印度梅恰尔一家三级护理教学医院剖宫产单剂量抗生素预防术后手术部位感染的前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 25;19(1):e0286165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286165. eCollection 2024.
7
Clarithromycin use for adjunct surgical prophylaxis before non-elective cesarean deliveries to adapt to azithromycin shortages in COVID-19 pandemic.克林霉素用于应对 COVID-19 大流行期间阿奇霉素短缺,作为非紧急剖宫产术辅助性外科预防用药。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 21;15(12):e0244266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244266. eCollection 2020.
8
Neonatal outcomes in term and preterm infants following adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery.择期剖宫产术辅助阿奇霉素抗生素预防后足月和早产婴儿的新生儿结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024 Dec;37(1):2367082. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2367082. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
9
Adding Azithromycin to Cephalosporin for Cesarean Delivery Infection Prophylaxis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.头孢菌素类药物联合阿奇霉素用于剖宫产感染预防的成本效果分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1279-1284. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002333.
10
Timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section: retrospective, difference-in-differences estimation of the effect on surgical-site-infection.剖宫产术中抗生素预防性使用的时机:关于手术部位感染影响的回顾性差异估计
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Mar;32(5):804-808. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1391784. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of a cesarean delivery bundle with vaginal preparation, cefazolin, and azithromycin in reducing postoperative infections: A before-and-after study.采用阴道准备、头孢唑林和阿奇霉素的剖宫产综合措施在降低术后感染方面的有效性:一项前后对照研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;170(1):448-455. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16194. Epub 2025 Feb 1.