Graduate School of Business, Columbia University (New York, NY, USA), National Bureau of Economic Research, and CESifo Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun;21(3):476-477. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1871330. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
We investigate whether the cancer sites that experienced more pharmaceutical innovation in New Zealand had larger subsequent declines in premature mortality and hospitalization rates and larger subsequent increases in 5-year survival rates, controlling for changes in incidence.
We estimate the effects of the number of WHO ATC5 chemical substances and ATC4 chemical subgroups approved on the number of years of potential life lost before ages 85, 75, 65, 5-year relative survival rates, and the number of inpatient hospital discharges, by estimating difference-in-differences (2-way fixed-effects) models using aggregate longitudinal data on 23 cancer sites.
Substances/subgroups approved during 1985-2001 reduced the number of years of potential life lost before age 85 (YPLL85) in 2017 by 67%. Those substances/subgroups reduced YPLL75 and YPLL65 in 2017 by similar percentages. The odds of surviving at least 5 years after diagnosis are significantly positively related to the number of substances previously approved.
The cost per life-year before age 85 gained in 2017 from previous drug approvals did not exceed 1719 USD. The WHO considers interventions whose cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained is less than per capita GDP to be highly cost-effective; New Zealand's per capita GDP in 2017 was 42,260 USD. capita GDP in 2017 was 42,260 USD.
Pharmaceutical innovation-the introduction and use of new drugs-substantially increased cancer survival rates in New Zealand, and substantially reduced premature (before ages 85, 75, and 65) cancer mortality there during the period 1998-2017. Moreover, overall the new cancer drugs were highly costeffective. The drugs approved during 1985-2001 are estimated to have reduced the number of years of potential life lost before age 85 in 2017 by 244,876. Even if previous drug approvals increased the cost of hospital discharges and other medical costs, the cost per life-year before age 85 gained in 2017 from those approvals could not have exceeded 1719 USD.
我们调查了在新西兰经历更多医药创新的癌症部位是否随后出现了更大幅度的过早死亡率和住院率下降,以及更大幅度的 5 年生存率上升,同时控制了发病率的变化。
我们通过使用 23 个癌症部位的汇总纵向数据,估计 2017 年 85 岁、75 岁、65 岁之前潜在寿命损失年数、5 年相对生存率和住院出院人数的变化,来估计差异中的差异(2 路固定效应)模型。
1985-2001 年批准的物质/亚组将 2017 年 85 岁前潜在寿命损失年数(YPLL85)减少了 67%。这些物质/亚组使 2017 年 YPLL75 和 YPLL65 的减少幅度相似。至少在诊断后存活 5 年的几率与之前批准的物质数量呈显著正相关。
2017 年从以前的药物批准中获得的每 85 岁前生命年的成本不超过 1719 美元。世界卫生组织认为,每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本低于人均国内生产总值的干预措施是高度有效的;2017 年新西兰的人均国内生产总值为 42260 美元。2017 年新西兰的人均国内生产总值为 42260 美元。
医药创新——新药的引入和使用——极大地提高了新西兰的癌症生存率,并在 1998-2017 年期间极大地降低了那里的过早(85 岁、75 岁和 65 岁之前)癌症死亡率。此外,总的来说,新的癌症药物具有很高的成本效益。据估计,1985-2001 年批准的药物将 2017 年 85 岁前潜在寿命损失年数减少了 244876 年。即使以前的药物批准增加了出院和其他医疗费用,2017 年从这些批准中获得的每 85 岁前生命年的成本也不可能超过 1719 美元。