Korsholm Kasper, Jensen Jesper Møller, Nørgaard Bjarne Linde, Samaras Athanasios, Saw Jacqueline, Berti Sergio, Tzikas Apostolos, Nielsen-Kudsk Jens Erik
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Jutland, Denmark.
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 11;14(1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.034.
This study aimed to investigate cardiac computed tomography (CT) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) peridevice leak (PDL) assessments, and the clinical relevance of PDL.
PDL assessment is integral during follow-up after left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion. Comparative studies of TEE and cardiac CT are sparse, and the clinical relevance of PDL is uncertain.
This was a single-center observational study of consecutive patients undergoing LAA occlusion with Amplatzer devices (Amplatzer Cardiac Plug/Amulet) between 2010 and 2018 (N = 415). Patients with both 8-week CT and TEE were included for analysis (n = 346). Images were analyzed by blinded investigators (K.K. and A.S.). PDL on cardiac CT was classified from grade 1 to 3, based on PDL at the device disc, device lobe, and LAA contrast patency. Primary clinical outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, or all-cause death.
PDL was present in 110 patients (32%) by TEE, with 29 (8%) >3 mm. By cardiac CT, 210 patients (61%) had PDL at the disc, with contrast patency in 204 patients (59%). A grade 3 PDL (gap at disc, lobe, and LAA contrast patency) was present in 63 patients (18%). Bland-Altman analysis showed poor agreement between CT and TEE for leak sizing. CT and TEE detected PDL was not significantly associated with worse outcome, hazard ratio: 1.82 (95 % confidence interval: 0.95 to 3.50); p = 0.07 and hazard ratio: 1.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 2.76); p = 0.28, respectively.
PDL occurrence is substantially higher with CT compared with TEE, with a large discrepancy between modalities in leak quantification. A novel CT-based classification is proposed, yet PDL was not associated with worse clinical outcome.
本研究旨在调查心脏计算机断层扫描(CT)和经食管超声心动图(TEE)对装置周围渗漏(PDL)的评估情况以及PDL的临床相关性。
在左心耳(LAA)封堵术后的随访过程中,PDL评估不可或缺。关于TEE和心脏CT的对比研究较少,且PDL的临床相关性尚不确定。
这是一项单中心观察性研究,纳入了2010年至2018年间连续接受使用Amplatzer装置(Amplatzer心脏封堵器/护身符)进行LAA封堵的患者(N = 415)。纳入同时进行了8周CT和TEE检查的患者进行分析(n = 346)。由盲法研究者(K.K.和A.S.)对图像进行分析。心脏CT上的PDL根据装置盘、装置叶和LAA造影剂通畅情况分为1至3级。主要临床结局为缺血性卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作、全身性栓塞或全因死亡的复合事件。
TEE检查发现110例患者(32%)存在PDL,其中29例(8%)PDL>3 mm。心脏CT检查显示,210例患者(61%)装置盘处存在PDL,204例患者(59%)有造影剂通畅。63例患者(18%)存在3级PDL(装置盘、叶和LAA造影剂通畅处均有间隙)。Bland-Altman分析显示,CT和TEE在渗漏大小测量方面一致性较差。CT和TEE检测到的PDL与较差结局无显著相关性,风险比分别为:1.82(95%置信区间:0.95至3.50);p = 0.07和风险比:1.43(95%置信区间:0.74至2.76);p = 0.28。
与TEE相比,CT检测到的PDL发生率显著更高,两种检查方式在渗漏定量方面存在较大差异。提出了一种基于CT的新分类方法,但PDL与较差的临床结局无关。