• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管左心耳封堵术:可用装置、陷阱、优势及未来方向

Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Devices Available, Pitfalls, Advantages, and Future Directions.

作者信息

Bavishi Chirag

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine Columbia, MO.

出版信息

US Cardiol. 2023 May 25;17:e05. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.37. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.15420/usc.2022.37
PMID:39493945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526496/
Abstract

Transcatheter left atrial appendage closure has emerged as a non-pharmacological alternative to long-term anticoagulation for stroke prevention in appropriately selected patients with AF. In this concise review, the Food and Drug Administration-approved and some other left atrial appendage closure devices that are under investigation are discussed. Currently, Watchman Flx and Amplatzer Amulet are the only two devices that have been approved for commercial use by the Food and Drug Administration. A brief overview of device designs, clinical data on efficacy and safety, major limitations of left atrial appendage closure devices, and perspectives on future direction are provided. The current generation of devices is effective; however, efforts should continue on innovations and refinement of device technology.

摘要

经导管左心耳封堵术已成为一种非药物替代疗法,用于在适当选择的房颤患者中预防中风的长期抗凝治疗。在这篇简要综述中,讨论了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的以及其他一些正在研究中的左心耳封堵装置。目前,Watchman Flx和Amplatzer Amulet是仅有的两种已获FDA批准可用于商业用途的装置。本文提供了装置设计的简要概述、疗效和安全性的临床数据、左心耳封堵装置的主要局限性以及未来方向的展望。当前一代装置是有效的;然而,应继续努力进行装置技术的创新和改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d76/11526496/bdb15539833e/usc-17-e05-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d76/11526496/ab1291551cdc/usc-17-e05-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d76/11526496/99f17eb33472/usc-17-e05-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d76/11526496/34a1d6c78950/usc-17-e05-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d76/11526496/bdb15539833e/usc-17-e05-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d76/11526496/ab1291551cdc/usc-17-e05-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d76/11526496/99f17eb33472/usc-17-e05-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d76/11526496/34a1d6c78950/usc-17-e05-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d76/11526496/bdb15539833e/usc-17-e05-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Devices Available, Pitfalls, Advantages, and Future Directions.经导管左心耳封堵术:可用装置、陷阱、优势及未来方向
US Cardiol. 2023 May 25;17:e05. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.37. eCollection 2023.
2
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous Watchman 2.5 device versus Amplatzer Amulet for left atrial appendage closure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and study-level meta-analysis.经皮 Watchman 2.5 装置与 Amplatzer Amulet 用于非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心耳封堵的安全性和有效性:系统评价和研究水平荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 14;19(2):e0295804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295804. eCollection 2024.
3
Safety of Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Watchman Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.用于心房颤动患者左心耳封堵的Amulet左心耳封堵器和Watchman装置的安全性
Cureus. 2024 Mar 4;16(3):e55531. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55531. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Left Atrial Appendage Closure with Watchman vs Amulet Devices: Similarities and Differences.左心耳封堵术与 Watchman 装置和 Amulet 装置:相似与不同。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Sep;25(9):909-915. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01913-7. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
5
Watchman vs. Amulet for Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.用于左心耳封堵的Watchman与Amulet:当前证据及未来展望
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 8;13(16):4651. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164651.
6
Comparison between Amulet and Watchman left atrial appendage closure devices: A real-world, single center experience.Amulet与Watchman左心耳封堵装置的比较:一项单中心真实世界经验。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Oct 19;37:100893. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100893. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Comparison between Amplatzer and Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较 Amplatzer 和 Watchman 左心耳封堵装置在预防房颤卒中的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiology. 2022;147(3):290-297. doi: 10.1159/000524626. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
8
Clinical efficacy and safety comparison of Watchman device versus ACP/Amulet device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A study-level meta-analysis of clinical trials.经皮左心耳封堵术治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中 Watchman 装置与 ACP/Amulet 装置的临床疗效和安全性比较:临床试验的研究水平荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Feb;46(2):117-125. doi: 10.1002/clc.23956. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
Left atrial appendage closure - Current status and future directions.左心耳封堵术——现状与未来方向。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Nov-Dec;69:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.11.013. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
10
Safety and efficacy of the Amplatzer Amulet and Watchman 2.5 for left atrial appendage occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于左心耳封堵的Amplatzer Amulet和Watchman 2.5的安全性与有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Oct;45(10):1237-1247. doi: 10.1111/pace.14576. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Left atrial appendage occlusion procedure and antithrombotics: less may be enough for lower risk patients: A single-center observational study.左心耳封堵术与抗栓药物:低风险患者或许少用即可:一项单中心观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 20;104(25):e42885. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042885.

本文引用的文献

1
Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A current overview.左心耳封堵术预防非瓣膜性心房颤动所致卒中:当前概述。
J Cardiol. 2023 May;81(5):420-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.11.006. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
2
Impact of Peridevice Leak on 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure.经皮左心耳封堵术后器械相关渗漏对 5 年结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Aug 2;80(5):469-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.062.
3
Left atrial appendage closure with the II generation Ultraseal device: An international registry. The LIGATE study.
二代 Ultraseal 装置行左心耳封堵术:一项国际注册研究。LIGATE 研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct;100(4):620-627. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30336. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
4
Comparative Endothelialization of Amulet LAA Occluder and Watchman 2.5 LAA Device: Observations From Explanted Hearts.Amulet左心耳封堵器与Watchman 2.5左心耳装置的内皮化比较:来自移植心脏的观察结果
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Jun;8(6):828-829. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.01.024. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
5
Clinical Impact of Residual Leaks Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Insights From the NCDR LAAO Registry.左心耳封堵术后残余分流的临床影响:来自国家心血管数据注册库左心耳封堵术登记处的见解
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Jun;8(6):766-778. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
6
Intracardiac Echocardiography-Guided Left Atrial Appendage Closure With a Novel Foam-Based Conformable Device: Safety and 1-Year Outcomes.心腔内超声心动图引导下使用新型泡沫基顺应性装置行左心耳封堵术:安全性和 1 年结果。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Feb;8(2):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
7
4-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Nonwarfarin Oral Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation.左心耳封堵术与非华法林口服抗凝药治疗心房颤动的 4 年结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 4;79(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.023. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
8
Amulet or Watchman Device for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Primary Results of the SWISS-APERO Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮左心耳封堵用器械(Amulet 或 Watchman 装置):SWISS-APERO 随机临床试验的主要结果。
Circulation. 2022 Mar 8;145(10):724-738. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057859. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
9
Amplatzer Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Versus Watchman Device for Stroke Prophylaxis (Amulet IDE): A Randomized, Controlled Trial.Amplatzer Amulet 左心耳封堵器与 Watchman 装置预防卒中(Amulet IDE):一项随机对照试验。
Circulation. 2021 Nov 9;144(19):1543-1552. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057063. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
10
Failure of Complete Endothelialization of a Watchman Device 3 Years Post-Implantation.植入3年后Watchman装置完全内皮化失败。
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Nov 11;3(2):319-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.09.022. eCollection 2021 Feb.