Klang Nina, Olsson Ingrid, Wilder Jenny, Lindqvist Gunilla, Fohlin Niclas, Nilholm Claes
Department of Education, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Special Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 22;11:586489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586489. eCollection 2020.
Concerning challenges with the social inclusion of children with special educational needs (SEN), it is imperative to evaluate teacher interventions that promote social inclusion. This study aimed to investigate the effects of cooperative learning (CL) intervention on social inclusion. In addition, it was investigated to what degree CL implementation affected the outcomes. Fifty-six teachers of 958 fifth-grade children were randomly selected to intervention and control groups upon recruitment to the study. The intervention teachers received training and coaching in CL and implemented this approach three to four times a week for 15 weeks. The results showed a significant but small effect of CL on children's social acceptance, but no significant effect on children's friendships and perceptions of classroom relationships. The degree of CL implementation had effect on children's social acceptance, but the effect was not consistent across social acceptance measures as a friend or a groupmate. Thus, it can be concluded that CL, conducted with the length and intensity of this study, may not lead to substantial changes in the social inclusion of children with SEN. In future studies, more focus needs to be devoted to teacher implementation of the CL approach.
关于有特殊教育需求(SEN)儿童的社会融入挑战,评估促进社会融入的教师干预措施势在必行。本研究旨在调查合作学习(CL)干预对社会融入的影响。此外,还研究了CL实施在多大程度上影响了结果。在招募到的958名五年级儿童中,56名教师被随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组教师接受了CL培训和指导,并在15周内每周实施三到四次这种方法。结果表明,CL对儿童的社会接纳有显著但微小的影响,但对儿童的友谊和课堂关系认知没有显著影响。CL的实施程度对儿童的社会接纳有影响,但在作为朋友或同学的社会接纳衡量标准上,影响并不一致。因此,可以得出结论,按照本研究的时长和强度进行的CL,可能不会导致有特殊教育需求儿童的社会融入发生实质性变化。在未来的研究中,需要更多地关注教师对CL方法的实施。