Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center, North Carolina State University, Plymouth, NC, USA.
Department of Entomology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, 413 Biological Sciences, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 May;77(5):2367-2374. doi: 10.1002/ps.6263. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Helicoverpa zea is managed with foliar applications of chlorantraniliprole in cotton varieties that do not express the Vip3Aa19 toxin in the US Cotton Belt. Foliar insecticides and Bt could interact to influence larval susceptibility. Therefore, it has been suggested that chlorantraniliprole can be used as a tool for Bt resistance management. We designed field and laboratory studies to test the hypothesis that the interaction of Bt toxin and chlorantraniliprole application would result in lower H. zea larval survival when compared to the individual effect of Bt or chlorantraniliprole alone. We also tested for these interactions over time, since chlorantraniliprole residual has not been studied in cotton.
Results from two field experiments and two laboratory experiments were similar. We found no interactions with Bt and chlorantraniliprole using data not corrected for natural mortality in untreated plots, indicating that these factors did not interact to influence survival. Moreover, we found that Bt and chlorantraniliprole did not interact to influence larval weight and instar. Chlorantraniliprole had lethal and sublethal effects on H. zea larval growth parameters feeding on cotton leaves up to 22 days after application, the final time period that we tested. Finally, concentration of chlorantraniliprole in the leaf was associated with larval survival for the duration of this study, but not larval growth or instar.
Our findings complement the recommendation to use chlorantraniliprole for managing H. zea in cotton, given its long-residual effects. However, the utility of chlorantraniliprole as a Bt-resistance management tool for H. zea remains unclear. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
在美国棉花带,不表达 Vip3Aa19 毒素的棉花品种,通过叶面喷施氯虫苯甲酰胺来防治棉铃虫。叶面杀虫剂和 Bt 可能会相互作用,影响幼虫的易感性。因此,有人建议氯虫苯甲酰胺可以作为 Bt 抗性管理的工具。我们设计了田间和实验室研究来检验以下假设:与 Bt 单独或单独使用氯虫苯甲酰胺相比,Bt 毒素和氯虫苯甲酰胺的联合应用会导致棉铃虫幼虫存活率降低。我们还测试了随时间的这些相互作用,因为尚未在棉花中研究氯虫苯甲酰胺的残留情况。
两项田间试验和两项实验室试验的结果相似。我们发现,在未校正未处理小区自然死亡率的情况下,Bt 和氯虫苯甲酰胺之间没有相互作用,这表明这些因素没有相互作用影响存活率。此外,我们发现 Bt 和氯虫苯甲酰胺对幼虫体重和龄期没有相互作用。氯虫苯甲酰胺对棉叶上取食的棉铃虫幼虫生长参数具有致死和亚致死作用,直至应用后 22 天,这是我们测试的最后一个时间段。最后,在本研究期间,氯虫苯甲酰胺在叶片中的浓度与幼虫存活率相关,但与幼虫生长或龄期无关。
我们的发现补充了使用氯虫苯甲酰胺来管理棉花中的棉铃虫的建议,因为它具有长期残留的效果。然而,氯虫苯甲酰胺作为棉铃虫 Bt 抗性管理工具的效用尚不清楚。 © 2021 化学工业协会。