Suppr超能文献

相似性和不确定性对听觉皮层早期和晚期处理阶段的信息掩蔽效应。

Informational Masking Effects of Similarity and Uncertainty on Early and Late Stages of Auditory Cortical Processing.

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2021 July/Aug;42(4):1006-1023. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000997.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Understanding speech in a background of other people talking is a difficult listening situation for hearing-impaired individuals, and even for those with normal hearing. Speech-on-speech masking is known to contribute to increased perceptual difficulty over nonspeech background noise because of informational masking provided over and above the effects of energetic masking. While informational masking research has identified factors of similarity and uncertainty between target and masker that contribute to reduced behavioral performance in speech background noise, critical gaps in knowledge including the underlying neural-perceptual processes remain. By systematically manipulating aspects of acoustic similarity and uncertainty in the same auditory paradigm, the current study examined the time course and objectively quantified these informational masking effects at both early and late stages of auditory processing using auditory evoked potentials (AEPs).

METHOD

Thirty participants were included in a cross-sectional repeated measures design. Target-masker similarity was manipulated by varying the linguistic/phonetic similarity (i.e., language) of the talkers in the background. Specifically, four levels representing hypothesized increasing levels of informational masking were implemented: (1) no masker (quiet); (2) Mandarin; (3) Dutch; and (4) English. Stimulus uncertainty was manipulated by task complexity, specifically presentation of target-to-target interval (TTI) in the auditory evoked paradigm. Participants had to discriminate between English word stimuli (/bæt/ and /pæt/) presented in an oddball paradigm under each masker condition pressing buttons to either the target or standard stimulus. Responses were recorded simultaneously for P1-N1-P2 (standard waveform) and P3 (target waveform). This design allowed for simultaneous recording of multiple AEP peaks, as well as accuracy, reaction time, and d' behavioral discrimination to button press responses.

RESULTS

Several trends in AEP components were consistent with effects of increasing linguistic/phonetic similarity and stimulus uncertainty. All babble maskers significantly affected outcomes compared to quiet. In addition, the native language English masker had the largest effect on outcomes in the AEP paradigm, including reduced P3 amplitude and area, as well as decreased accuracy and d' behavioral discrimination to target word responses. AEP outcomes for the Mandarin and Dutch maskers, however, were not significantly different across any measured component. Latency outcomes for both N1 and P3 also supported an effect of stimulus uncertainty, consistent with increased processing time related to greater task complexity. An unanticipated result was the absence of the interaction of linguistic/phonetic similarity and stimulus uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Observable effects of both similarity and uncertainty were evidenced at a level of the P3 more than the earlier N1 level of auditory cortical processing suggesting that higher-level active auditory processing may be more sensitive to informational masking deficits. The lack of significant interaction between similarity and uncertainty at either level of processing suggests that these informational masking factors operated independently. Speech babble maskers across languages altered AEP component measures, behavioral detection, and reaction time. Specifically, this occurred when the babble was in the native/same language as the target, while the effects of foreign language maskers did not differ. The objective results from this study provide a foundation for further investigation of how the linguistic content of target and masker and task difficulty contribute to difficulty understanding speech-in-noise.

摘要

目的

对于听力受损者,甚至对于听力正常的人来说,在其他人说话的背景下理解言语是一种困难的听力情况。与非言语背景噪声相比,语音掩蔽会导致感知难度增加,因为信息掩蔽提供了超过能量掩蔽的效果。虽然信息掩蔽研究已经确定了目标掩蔽器之间的相似性和不确定性因素,这些因素会导致在语音背景噪声中的行为表现下降,但仍存在关键的知识空白,包括潜在的神经感知过程。通过在相同的听觉范式中系统地操纵声学相似性和不确定性的各个方面,本研究使用听觉诱发电位 (AEPs) 在听觉处理的早期和晚期阶段,同时检查了时间过程并客观地量化了这些信息掩蔽效应。

方法

30 名参与者参与了一项横断面重复测量设计。通过改变背景中说话者的语言/语音相似性(即语言)来操纵目标-掩蔽器相似性。具体来说,实施了四个代表假设的信息掩蔽程度增加的水平:(1) 无掩蔽器(安静);(2) 普通话;(3) 荷兰语;和 (4) 英语。通过任务复杂性来操纵刺激不确定性,特别是在听觉诱发电范式中呈现目标-目标间隔 (TTI)。参与者必须在每个掩蔽器条件下辨别以英语单词刺激 (/bæt/ 和 /pæt/) 为目标的听觉诱发电范式中的oddball 范式,通过按钮按标准或目标刺激。同时记录响应。这种设计允许同时记录多个 AEP 峰值,以及准确性、反应时间和 d' 行为辨别力按钮响应。

结果

几个 AEP 成分的趋势与语言/语音相似性和刺激不确定性增加的影响一致。与安静相比,所有的嘈杂掩蔽器都对结果产生了显著影响。此外,母语英语掩蔽器对 AEP 范式中的结果影响最大,包括降低 P3 幅度和面积,以及降低目标单词响应的准确性和 d' 行为辨别力。然而,普通话和荷兰语掩蔽器的 Mandarin 和 Dutch 掩蔽器的结果在任何测量的成分中都没有显著差异。N1 和 P3 的潜伏期结果也支持刺激不确定性的影响,这与与更大的任务复杂性相关的增加处理时间一致。一个意外的结果是,语言/语音相似性和刺激不确定性之间没有交互作用。

结论

在听觉皮质处理的 P3 水平上可以观察到相似性和不确定性的明显影响,而不是早期的 N1 水平,这表明更高层次的主动听觉处理可能对信息掩蔽缺陷更为敏感。在处理的任何一个水平上,相似性和不确定性之间都没有显著的相互作用,这表明这些信息掩蔽因素是独立作用的。跨语言的语音嘈杂掩蔽器改变了 AEP 成分测量、行为检测和反应时间。具体来说,当嘈杂声是目标的母语/相同语言时,会发生这种情况,而外语嘈杂声的影响则没有差异。本研究的客观结果为进一步研究目标和掩蔽器的语言内容以及任务难度如何导致理解语音困难提供了基础。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验