Nesto R W, Phillips R T, Kett K G, Hill T, Perper E, Young E, Leland O S
Department of Medicine, New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ann Intern Med. 1988 Feb;108(2):170-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-2-170.
Patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease are thought to have painless myocardial ischemia more often than patients without diabetes. We studied 50 consecutive patients with diabetes and 50 consecutive patients without diabetes, all with ischemia, on exercise thallium scintigraphy to show the reliability of angina as a marker for exertional ischemia. The two groups had similar clinical characteristics, treadmill test results, and extent of infarction and ischemia, but only 14 [corrected] patients with diabetes compared with 34 [corrected] patients without diabetes had angina during exertional ischemia. In diabetic patients the extent of retinopathy, nephropathy, or peripheral neuropathy was similar in patients with and without angina. Angina is an unreliable index of myocardial ischemia in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. Given the increased cardiac morbidity and mortality in such patients, periodic objective assessments of the extent of ischemia are warranted.
与没有糖尿病的患者相比,糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病患者被认为更常出现无痛性心肌缺血。我们对50例连续的糖尿病患者和50例连续的非糖尿病患者进行了研究,所有患者均有缺血表现,通过运动铊闪烁扫描来显示心绞痛作为劳力性缺血标志物的可靠性。两组患者的临床特征、平板运动试验结果以及梗死和缺血范围相似,但在劳力性缺血期间,只有14例[校正后]糖尿病患者出现心绞痛,而无糖尿病患者有34例[校正后]出现心绞痛。在糖尿病患者中,有无心绞痛患者的视网膜病变、肾病或周围神经病变程度相似。对于患有冠状动脉疾病的糖尿病患者,心绞痛是心肌缺血的不可靠指标。鉴于此类患者心脏发病率和死亡率增加,有必要定期对缺血程度进行客观评估。